Does anyone speculate on bitcoin
The price of bitcoin rose to $18278 in one day. Who is speculating
From the figure, we can see that bitcoin transactions are mainly concted in the United States, Russia, China, South Korea, Malaysia and other countries.the distribution of users' age is mainly concentrated in the 25-35 years old. And men are significantly ahead of women in bitcoin speculation, Many of them regard bitcoin as an asset investment.
most of them like medium risk investment.
the data in this paper comes from huocoin.com http://www.huobi.pro
the process of bitcoin is like this<
2009 - bitcoin was born
in 2009-13, makers were mainly busy investing in mines and digging for bitcoin. At this time, there is no circulation of bitcoin. Anyone can simply get bitcoin, which is basically worthless
in 2013, the number of bitcoin reached 50% of the total design amount (the upper limit of 21 million)
in 2014, we started to hype bitcoin trading and set up bitcoin trading platform
14-17 years - makers continue to invest in mines and dig bitcoin. Bitcoin trading is completely folk, and there is no market maker
2017 - the number of bitcoins has reached 75% of the total design, and most of them are controlled by the makers
in 2017, makers began to enter the market and used bitcoin as a tool to escape supervision
since 2018, bitcoin has played a very significant role in escaping supervision, with a large amount of funds flowing through bitcoin control institutions, and bitcoin has gone up
here we want to talk about why the makers want to control the market. Because this thing itself has no value at all, if you want to flow capital through this thing, it must appear normal on the surface. Because you are under the supervision of the financial sector in the overall environment, you can't just pick up a stone and say how much it's worth
first of all, my purpose is to transfer my funds "legally" through self selling and self buying, rather than actually buying the so-called bitcoin
secondly, I need to make bitcoin valuable enough to transfer more money
thirdly, as soon as the retail investors enter the market, they will soon find that there is not much liquidity at all, and they can't support the price. If the retail investors have too many bitcoins and they sell them casually, I can't really spend money to buy them. When the market price collapses, I can't play the game of selling and buying by myself.
In view of the rumor that 360 security guard has a "back door" spread on the Internet in 2010, China Information Security Evaluation Center issued an evaluation report on February 9, 2010, which shows that after strict technical review and security test, "360 security guard client v6.1.5.1010" has passed the national information security proct evaluation and obtained the national information security evaluation eal2 certificate. During the test, no "back door" was found in "360 security guard client v6.1.5.1010", and no vulnerability was found in "360 security guard client v6.1.5.1010"
China Information Security Evaluation Center is an authoritative organization specialized in information technology security testing and risk assessment in China. According to the authorization of the central government, the main functions of the evaluation center include: responsible for security vulnerability analysis and information notification of information technology procts and systems; Be responsible for the security risk assessment of information network and important information system of Party and government organs; Carry out security testing and evaluation of information technology procts, systems and engineering construction. Since its establishment in 1997, the evaluation center has provided technical support for the state and public services to the society in the field of information security in accordance with national laws and regulations
the test results of China Information Security Evaluation Center show that "360 security guard client v6.1.5.1010" has passed the vulnerability assessment test of anti rootkit and other vulnerabilities and user privacy leakage, and no vulnerability or user privacy leakage has been found. The test results show that "360 security guard client v6.1.5.1010" does not find "back door". On July 1, 2010, Qihoo 360 sued Ruixing for unfair competition. Qihoo 360 asked Ruixing to compensate 9.8 million yuan for economic losses. It is understood that in February 2010, rising pointed out that 360 software had a "back door". Qihoo 360 thought rising was malicious slander, and pointed out that the 360 program rumored by rising had a "back door", which is actually a high-end anti Trojan detection, removal and repair technology (anti rootkit)“ "Loophole" and "back door" are two completely different concepts, but rising deliberately confused them
Qihu 360 filed a lawsuit with Beijing Xicheng District People's court for Ruixing's pointing out that 360 software has a "back door", demanding Ruixing to compensate 8.8 million yuan for economic losses and report the case to Beijing public security organ
Qihoo 360 requests Ruixing and Beijing Yijin Yuhui Technology Investment Co., Ltd. to stop unfair competition against the plaintiff; They also made public clarifications and apologies on CCTV, Beijing Youth Daily, Beijing Evening News and other media; And jointly compensate the plaintiff for economic loss of 9.8 million yuan and spiritual loss of 1 yuan
in response, rising refuted, saying that Qihoo 360 claimed that its 360 brand and 360 security guard procts enjoyed a high popularity and reputation in the instry was lack of factual evidence, and pointed out that there was evidence that could not prove that the plaintiff had legally obtained the test certificate and sales license issued by the Ministry of public security for all 360 security guard software procts. Ruixing pointed out that the above version of 360 security guard software of Qihoo brand was exposed as "potential safety hazard", but did not specifically point to Qihoo 360. Ruixing does not have the behavior and speech of "fabricating and fabricating false facts" stipulated in the anti unfair competition law
rising said that so far, Qihoo 360 has enjoyed a high reputation, and its software is free to download, without any objective and actual economic losses
it is reported that the case of Qihoo v. rising unfair competition is being tried in court. Qihoo and rising are still in heated debate, and the case has not yet been adjudicated. On May 10, 2011, the court of Xicheng District of Beijing publicly declared that Qihoo 360 sued rising company for "fabricating facts and maliciously attacking Qihoo 360's commercial reputation and commodity reputation by unfair competition". The court held that Ruixing company had engaged in unfair competition that infringed Qihoo 360's business reputation and commodity reputation, which constituted unfair competition and should bear corresponding tort liability. Therefore, Ruixing immediately stopped unfair competition against Qihoo 360, issued an apology statement on Beijing Youth Daily for 10 consecutive days, and compensated Qihoo 360 for 200000 yuan
on February 2, 2010, rising made use of its official website to widely spread the article that "360 installs a 'back door' for users", saying that 360 security guards will privately open a 'back door' when installing into users' computers, and this' back door 'has huge security risks. Hackers can use this backdoor to perform arbitrary operations on the system registry and user information (files), such as reading, modifying, deleting, etc. Rising company widely spread the above articles on its official website, client software and media, constantly expanding the damage to the plaintiff. Qihoo 360 company believes that these defamatory untrue remarks have caused great damage to the good reputation of 360 safety procts, are serious defamation of 360's business image, and are acts of unfair competition
