What is the current attitude of the regulatory authorities in di
European and American countries are actively monitoring. Germany is the first country to recognize bitcoin and other digital assets as private property. The US CFTC (US Commodity Futures Commission) has identified bitcoin as a commodity. The state of New York has issued three bitlicenses
the situation in Asia is different. Japan actively supports it. In April this year, Japan implemented the payment services act, officially recognizing bitcoin as a legal payment method
South Korea is actively monitoring. In July, South Korea's "bitcoin Regulation Act" came out, setting a threshold of 500 million won for investors
China has strict supervision. In September, the people's Bank of China and other seven ministries and commissions jointly issued the "notice on preventing the financing risk of token issuance", which stipulates that in China, trading platforms shall not engage in the exchange business between legal tender and "virtual currency".
at the end of June 2013, after the German parliament decided that bitcoin would be tax-free if it was held for more than one year, bitcoin was recognized as a "unit of account" by the German Ministry of finance, which means that bitcoin has been regarded as a legal currency in Germany and can be used to pay taxes and engage in trade activities< In August 2013, judge Amos mazant of Texas District Court ruled in a case of bitcoin virtual hedge fund that bitcoin is a kind of currency and should be included in the scope of financial regulation
legal status
bitcoin can still be considered as legal at present. In the world, bitcoin can be regarded as a virtual commodity and protected by law; If bitcoin cannot be officially recognized as a kind of currency by law, it may bring inconvenience to the businesses and indivials who accept bitcoin in tax declaration, because the businesses who accept bitcoin will be regarded as barter transactions, and such transactions are more troublesome than ordinary transactions in tax declaration
at the same time, bitcoin, as a commodity highly similar to currency, needs to meet the demand of anti money laundering. Bitcoin needs to be included in the personal property declaration, banking anti money laundering system, anti insider trading, anti market manipulation and other systems in terms of transaction and possession. Bitcoin exchanges and storage institutions may also need government supervision and licensing. Some fast-growing bitcoin exchanges and payment service providers are actively exploring cooperation with regulatory agencies to bring bitcoin payment into the regulatory framework of anti money laundering and anti-terrorism financing by applying for licenses and actively communicating with regulatory authorities
in Europe, the European Central Bank published a report on "virtual currency architecture", and the French bitcoin trading platform obtained the PSP qualification. On December 6, 2012, the central bank wrote in the report: "this report is the first attempt to provide a basis for discussing the virtual currency system. While these systems may play an active role in financial innovation and in providing consumers with alternative means of payment, they also clearly create risks. " "Because of the small size of virtual currency systems, these risks do not affect anyone other than the users of these systems," the report added The report reviews the history of bitcoin and reviews its basic features, including currency and technical operation.
in view of the possible risks of virtual currency, many international organizations and central banks have responded publicly to the supervision of virtual currency system. These responses can be roughly divided into four categories: warning and risk warning, supervision and registration permission, legislative norms, and explicit prohibition
(1) warning and risk warning
some central banks and regulators have issued risk warnings against the special currency and virtual currency system. The federal financial regulatory authority of Germany, the Bank of France, the central banks of the Netherlands and Belgium have issued public warnings against the possible money laundering and terrorist financing caused by the use of bitcoin. In the report released at the end of 2013, the European Banking authority (EBA) warned consumers of many risks of virtual currency, such as exchange loss, e-wallet theft, unprotected payment, price fluctuation and so on. Although Spain did not have a similar risk warning, it issued a timely information announcement related to virtual currency
(2) supervision and registration license
generally speaking, international organizations believe that the supervision of virtual currency should find a balance between risk prevention and innovation promotion. Since 2012, Sweden has required transactions related to virtual currency to be registered with financial regulators. Other countries pay attention to qualification supervision, so as to make it indirectly meet the requirements of prudential supervision. In other countries, the regulation mainly focuses on the business model of virtual currency transaction. The financial prudential regulatory authority of France regards the provision of bitcoin circulation and trading services and the act of earning funds in the process as a payment service and requires the authorization of the government. In addition, some countries focus on the intermediary institutions related to virtual currency. The German federal financial regulatory agency and Danish regulators believe that the provision of intermediary services for virtual currency needs to be authorized< (3) legislative norms
at present, some countries have proposed legislation to regulate virtual currency transactions. Canada plans to legislate to allow the government to supervise the transaction of bitcoin, and to include the transaction of more than US $10000 into the scope of suspicious supervision. The United States hopes to adjust the relevant legal structure should be compared with the development of the special currency. In order to make the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) applicable in the context of network, the financial crime enforcement network (FinCEN) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the explanatory guidance on the behavior and subject definition of private generation, holding, distribution, trading, acceptance and transmission of virtual currency in 2013. The European central bank stressed that it should strengthen international cooperation under the existing legal framework, and regulate virtual currency from the European and global level under the existing legal framework. More countries believe that bitcoin is not a currency in circulation, has no legal status, and does not meet the definition of financial instruments, such as Finland, Sweden, Malaysia and Indonesia
(4) it is forbidden
in some countries, bitcoin related transactions are prohibited. In December 2013, the people's Bank of China banned financial institutions from trading in bitcoin, which was subsequently extended to payment service providers. The central banks of Thailand and Indonesia share the same attitude. The circulation of anonymous internet currency (including bitcoin) is prohibited by the Russian judicial inspection department as a substitute for currency. The Central Bank of Russia has earlier included the provision of bitcoin services in the scope of suspicious transaction monitoring. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has banned the issue of unregistered shares in exchange for bitcoin, and unregistered online securities trading activities in virtual currency.
according to foreign media reports, with the growing popularity of bitcoin, central bank governors around the world have also expressed their views on this digital currency
Federal Reserve Bank of the United States
in December last year, at the monetary policy meeting of the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States, Janet Yellen, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, was asked what she thought of bitcoin
According to Yellen, this kind of digital currency is a "highly speculative asset" and "cannot be legal tender". She added that it "plays a negligible role in the payment system" and that it "is not a stable store of value.""the Federal Reserve Bank will not make any policy on bitcoin. Instead, we will only ensure that the banking institutions we supervise pay close attention to digital currency and properly manage their interaction with traders in the market. Moreover, we will monitor whether these banking institutions have fulfilled their responsibilities to combat money laundering and ensure the safety of banks. " Yellen said
at the end of November last year, Jerome Powell, who will replace Yellen as chairman of the Federal Reserve in February this year, also expressed his views on cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrencies "don't matter now" because "they're not big enough," he said
According to Powell, the financial risk brought by digital currency to the financial market is minimal“ They're not big enough, they don't matter now. " He saidEuropean Central Bank
in October last year, Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank, said that cryptocurrency was not "mature" enough for the central bank to regulate management
"for anything new, people are always full of expectations, but also feel very uncertain. Now, as far as bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are concerned, we don't think they are mature enough for us to consider standardized management. " He said
Draghi pointed out that tools like bitcoin have both advantages and disadvantages, and we need to weigh them carefully
"a lesson of the great financial crisis is financial innovation. As far as bitcoin is concerned, it is a financial and technological innovation. We should pay close attention to its potential risks while paying attention to it. " He said
Bank of Canada
in December last year, Stephen poloz, President of the Bank of Canada, also spent some time discussing cryptocurrency. He claims that buying digital currency is a gamble, not an investment
"perhaps no one can say clearly what their real value is. One can at most say that buying digital currency is buying risk. This makes it closer to gambling than investment. " "For people who want to buy cryptocurrency, what I want to say is that you should read the collateral to make sure you know what you're investing in," boloz said
According to boloz, the demand for digital currency will increase in the future. He added that the Central Bank of Canada was studying whether to issue its own digital currency"bank staff are studying the conditions under which the central bank is more suitable to issue its own digital currency for retail transactions." He said
Reserve Bank of Australia
in December last year, Reserve Bank of Australia President Philip Lowe talked about bitcoin in a speech. He pointed out that this kind of digital currency will not be used in daily payment activities, and it can not be accepted so soon
According to Lowe, the reason is that the price of bitcoin is extremely unstable, the number of payments that can be processed at the same time is limited, the transaction and electricity costs are too high, and the management is too difficultmoreover, when bitcoin is only used as a payment tool, it "is more likely to attract those who want to trade in black or illegal economic activities."
Bank of Japan
at the end of 2017, Haruhiko Kuroda, President of Bank of Japan, said the price fluctuation of bitcoin was "extremely abnormal"
when asked if there will be a bubble in bitcoin, he replied, "I may not be qualified to evaluate it, but if you look at its trend, you will see that its price fluctuation is very abnormal. If you want to ask whether bitcoin has the same function as money, that is, as a payment or settlement tool, then my answer is No
investment should be cautious and private letter from mining machinery is needed
At the G20 meeting, different countries held different views on digital currency, some strongly resisted it, and some actively supervised it. Now let's take a look at the attitudes of the G20 countries towards digital currency
In a statement, the Canadian Securities Regulatory Agency (CSA) said that considering the whole process of ICO issuance, many ICO tokens meet the definition of securities and require them to comply with the securities law. In addition, the CSA noted that ICOS may also be derivatives, subject to derivatives laws passed by Canadian securities regulators, including trade reporting rules. Regulators said they welcome companies that are about to conct ICO to enter the "regulatory sandbox" to test new financial procts in a limited environmentIndia
the securities and Exchange Commission of India is planning guidelines for the regulation of the bitcoin market in India. In addition, the securities and Exchange Commission of India set up a financial regulatory commission and held meetings with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) officials. The SEC also plans to regulate whether bitcoin derivatives and other cryptocurrencies are used to raise funds illegally
in October 2013, bitcoin Bank of Australia was attacked by hackers, with a loss value of more than US $1 million. This incident has aroused the concern of bitcoin security in Australia. The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian tax office have said they want a virtual currency tax like a business transfer tax
Bangladesh
the Central Bank of Bangladesh banned the use of virtual currency in September 2014. Using bitcoin will be punished by law
Brazil
Brazil is one of the few countries in the world that has enacted laws related to electronic currency payment systems. Brazil has not banned bitcoin
Bolivia
for regulatory reasons, the Central Bank of Bolivia (BCB) has banned the use of bitcoin. BCB believes cryptocurrency will help business entities evade taxes
Canada
bitcoin is not considered legal, that is, bitcoin is not recognized by Canadian law. Canada's tax authorities plan to implement the same tax plan as barter trade and speculative trading for the bitcoin
China
China is one of the few countries in the world that ban bitcoin completely and prohibit financial institutions and banks from dealing with bitcoin transactions. In December 2013, the people's Bank of China issued a notice calling bitcoin & quot; Virtual goods;, And prevent it from becoming money
trading has been suspended
Ecuador has banned bitcoin, but it has chosen to set up a new state-owned electronic currency and monetary system, and the currency will be protected by the assets of the Central Bank of Ecuador
EU
at present, the EU still has different views on the classification of bitcoin. In October 2012, the European Central Bank's report on virtual currency concerns the legality of bitcoin under the EU legal framework. The European Banking Regulatory Authority issued a bitcoin risk warning, saying that the use of bitcoin has not been restricted at present
Finland
Finland has relevant regulations for the use of virtual currencies such as bitcoin. The relevant regulations are issued by the Finnish tax authority Vero skatt. Any gains arising from bitcoin transactions will be subject to capital gains tax
Hong Kong
Hong Kong has no regulations for bitcoin or any other virtual currency. However, the government is closely monitoring the use of bitcoin to prohibit money laundering, fraud and other illegal activities
India
India does not explicitly stipulate or prohibit the use of bitcoin. However, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), equivalent to the Central Bank of India, has been forced to shut down India's largest bitcoin trading platform after it issued a notice that the use of bitcoin could cause money laundering and security problems
Israel
the Israeli tax authority is considering levying income tax on bitcoin transactions. Israeli banks even blackmail bitcoin payments
Kyrgyz
Kyrgyz central bank has banned the use of digital currency and bitcoin for the reasons of lack of centralized management, high currency risk and legal problems
Russia
the Central Bank of Russia believes that bitcoin may be used for money laundering and terrorist financing. Therefore, the Russian government banned the use of bitcoin
Taiwan
Taiwan's financial supervision commission is concerned about the uncertainty and speculation of bitcoin, so Taiwan opposes the installation of bitcoin ATM
UK
at present, there are no relevant regulations for the bitcoin. Profits or losses from bitcoin transactions are subject to capital gains tax, while the purchase of bitcoin is still subject to VAT
the U.S.
the U.S. is probably the most supportive country for virtual currencies such as bitcoin. There are no final rules on bitcoin. However, there are also many new rules for the establishment of bitcoin management framework.
In fact, there is one more detail that we need to pay attention to, that is, the price of bitcoin has been directly reced from US $60000 to US $52000, and countries have directly indicated that they will strengthen supervision. Before that, you should know that the price of bitcoin soared from more than 10000 US dollars to 60000 US dollars. It's boring. Why didn't the regulators of various countries directly intervene in such a long period of time? So today we will discuss the factors that affect the fluctuation of bitcoin{ Third, the confidence of consumers or investors
in the past few months, bitcoin's long-term success is that the manual has brought her a high degree of popularity, and at the same time, its price has gone up by leaps and bounds. But everyone is tired. After seeing some information about bitcoin for a long time, we are not very interested. The visual impact of tens of thousands of dollars has lost any freshness. In this case, everyone's investment enthusiasm for bitcoin will naturally decline, which will lead to its price decline