Position: Home page » Blockchain » CCID evaluation blockchain
CCID evaluation blockchain
Publish: 2021-04-29 17:30:46
1.
CCID (Qing) blockchain Research Institute Co., Ltd. is another limited liability company incorporated in Laoshan District, Qing City, Shandong Province on September 26, 2017. Its registered address is located in room 2002, 20th floor, building 2, Darong century complex building (Darong Center), 180 Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qing City, Shandong Province
the unified social credit code / registration number of CCID (Qing) blockchain Research Institute Co., Ltd. is 91370212ma3elctn5g, and Liu Yi, the legal person of the company, is currently in business
CCID (Qing) blockchain Research Institute Co., Ltd., within the province, the current registered capital of the enterprise is general
view more information and information of CCID (Qing) blockchain Research Institute Co., Ltd. through network enterprise credit
2. Radar coin and Fuyuan coin have nothing to do, radar coin transaction is very simple, private letter can teach oh
3. Full name: information technology
refers to the basic concept and scope of information technology< In fact, it has three levels: the first level is hardware, which mainly refers to the host and network communication equipment for data storage, processing and transmission; The second layer refers to software, including various kinds of software that can be used to collect, store, retrieve, analyze, apply and evaluate information. It includes business management software such as ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), CRM (Customer Relationship Management), SCM (Supply Chain Management), WF (workflow) management software that can be used to strengthen process management DW / DM (data warehouse and data mining) software for auxiliary analysis, etc; The third layer refers to the application, which refers to the collection, storage, retrieval, analysis, application, evaluation and use of various kinds of information, including the application of ERP, CRM, SCM and other software to directly assist decision-making, and the use of other decision-making analysis models or DW / DM and other technical means to further improve the quality of analysis and assist decision-makers to make decisions (emphasis on one point, only to assist rather than replace decision-making). Some people understand that it combines the first two layers into one, which refers to the storage, processing and transmission of information, while the latter refers to the application of information; Some people combine the latter two layers into one, and then divide them into hard front and soft back. Generally, the third layer has not been paid enough attention, but in fact, only when the information is effectively applied, can the value of it be brought into full play and the goal of informatization be truly realized. Informatization itself is not a goal, it is just a better means to achieve the goal in the current era
What does Carl mean by it? In that article, he did not explicitly mention it, but he mentioned the core functions of information technology -- data storage, processing and transmission. From the logic of his reasoning, that is, from the steam engine, railway, Telegraph and telephone, electric power and other infrastructure construction, we also use Moore's law to prove the development of mainframe and optical fiber. If he stops here and only starts from this point, his logical argument is very rigorous. Those who later commented on it no longer matters, regardless of their support or opposition, basically agree with this point (except for those hardware and network manufacturers), and the author also agrees with this point. Throughout the article, he paid a lot of attention to the construction of materialized IT infrastructure, and basically did not pay attention to the application level. But later, when he talked about the trend of popularization, he mentioned that "information technology is very easy to ", which pushed it back to commercial software. Here, he has taken a "dangerous" step. When he published the book of the same name in 2004, he defined it from his research and analogy at the beginning. "I use it to refer to all the hardware and software used to store, process and transmit information in digital form in the general sense. In particular, I only refer to the technology itself, What I mean by "it" does not include the information flowing in technology and the skills of those who use technology. "So what he means by it is the first two layers. If this stop, there may not be too much controversy (this time plus those uncomfortable software manufacturers). Objectively analyzing the characteristics of the software itself, it is true that there are three of the four criteria for judging whether the software does not have the core competitiveness, namely, scarcity, not easy to , and not easy to replace. Karl himself does not deny and emphasizes the fourth criterion for judging whether it has the core competitiveness, that is, value. But he just set the title as "it is no longer important", and wanted to beat the whole it to death
it's a pity that he is often confused about the concept of it: sometimes he refers to the host network, and then he goes to the software. In his later published books, he often "accidentally" steps to the third level, which completely violates the scope of it defined by him at the beginning of the book, such as discussing the application of information technology, questioning CIO, etc. Many readers, including the editor of Harvard Business Review, pointed out this at that time. Many other people attacked him because of this. Some even said that Karl didn't know it at all, which might be true, because he didn't do it at all. This also gives us a lot of inspiration and vigilance. We should be very careful when we apply other methods to the fields we are not familiar with, otherwise we will make a lot of jokes
here, I would like to emphasize that there are often software manufacturers (both at home and abroad) who claim that they can do what they want with informatization and strengthen the core competitiveness of enterprises (anyway, most of them follow what is popular now and "keep pace with the times"). I don't know whether they are intentionally or unintentionally, and they don't infer from the four criteria of core competitiveness. Let's ask a few simple questions: what can we do if we use informatization? How many enterprises that use informatization have lost money or even closed down? Especially software companies that claim to have hundreds of thousands of customers using their software should ask themselves. If the information can be used, can we automatically increase sales and rece inventory if we assume that all the information such as stock in, stock out, sales and inventory is accurate? If the boss may be confused because he can't see before he went to informatization, but he lives happily, what about now? Just painful to know that there are so many inventory in the warehouse for such a long time, so many goods occupy the counter for a long time, but did not bring any sales, let alone profit! This paper analyzes the phenomenon that software manufacturers publicize that "information technology is the core competitiveness of enterprises". There are only two conclusions: either these enterprises do not understand what is the core competitiveness (I think most of them still understand it, I hope they understand it and I hope they do not understand it, I hope that the result is to understand, because at least software companies can understand some management concepts, rather than immerse themselves in a purely technical company. I hope that the result is not to understand, because it can be less attacked by others, without professional ethics, it is not too much for those who do not know). There is a serious problem of information asymmetry between general enterprise customers and IT enterprises. The final result of the game between IT enterprises and enterprise customers is often the second best choice, which is called "lemon effect". In this regard, in addition to IT enterprises and employees to improve their professional ethics, the government or instry must strengthen the training and ecation of information construction, improve the enterprise's understanding of information construction, and introce management consulting companies and supervision companies to change the outcome of the game, so as to achieve a new balance and promote the healthy development of IT instry
information technology itself is just a tool, just like a sword or a good pen. Buying it doesn't necessarily guarantee how much you can improve your martial arts and how beautiful your handwriting is. It also requires you to constantly practice how to dance sword and how to write. Information construction also requires you to constantly improve your ability to use information, which is the real core and the most difficult part. Kung Fu is out of the question! The purpose of informatization (digitization) is not to take a few numbers from the system, it is just the foundation, and its core lies in the word "Hua", which integrates all kinds of resource related information to carry out "rationalization" and "optimization" configuration. For example, use historical information to assist in sales forecast, purchase plan, proction plan, distribution plan and inventory plan, issue instructions according to these plans, and revise plans according to actual operation. The computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) put forward by Dr. Joseph Harrington of the United States contains two basic viewpoints: one is that all links of enterprise proction, including market analysis, proct design, processing and manufacturing, operation and management, and after-sales service, are an inseparable whole, which must be closely linked and considered in a unified way; the other is that all links of enterprise proction, including market analysis, proct design, processing and manufacturing, operation and management, and after-sales service, are inseparable from each other; Second, the whole operation process is essentially a process of data collection, transmission and processing, and the final proct can be regarded as the material expression of data. If the information system is used to assist decision-making, or operates according to the original operation mode, the role of the information system may be limited to liberating some jobs of some posts, such as statistical reports, and at the same time, it will increase the work of other posts. A large number of experiences show that it is impossible to achieve accurate, timely and complete information for decision-making without the data collected by information system. Only by using it can information system graally improve its accuracy, timeliness and integrity. According to the evaluation standard of core competence, in order to construct core competence, only integration ability is essential, and the more explicit the ability is, the easier it is to be imitated. At the tip of the iceberg, the less exposed it is, the less likely it is to be imitated, and the more likely it is to form a core competitiveness
as Hal Varian, editor of Harvard Business Review, pointed out: "Carl is right to say that it is being commercialized and no longer provides competitive advantage. But knowing how to use it effectively is still a very scarce skill. "“ It's not it that provides competitive advantage, it's people who know how to use it effectively. "“ Companies spend thousands of money on data storage and access to customer transaction data, but a lot of data is lying there, not analyzed, not used, but in the hands of trained analysts, the same data can proce huge returns! " This is an era of rich data, but at the same time, it is an era of poor knowledge<
Thomas H. Davenport, Professor of information systems management at Boston University School of management, wants to describe "the past 40 years as the 'data age' rather than the 'information age'", "transforming data into something more useful requires a lot of human investment and wisdom, but most organizations only look at this problem from the perspective of technology. It is necessary to have a database or data mining system as well as other technologies, but it is not enough for high-quality information and knowledge
therefore, it is necessary to clarify some basic concepts that are often confused
data = the actual record shows that the sales volume of series a procts in East China in the previous quarter was 1.2 million
information = (information) = data + meaning. The sales of series a procts in East China in the previous quarter decreased by 25% compared with the same period last year
intelligence = information + understanding and reasoning. For example, is it because the sales units in East China are not good, or a series of procts have entered a recession, or the company's overall marketing activities are backward and competitors' strong promotion? Or other reasons
knowledge = problem solving skills. What is the company's strategy to deal with this problem
wisdom = selection of knowledge there may be many action plans to deal with, but which * wisdom (strategy) to choose. Action will generate new trading data
data, information, intelligence, knowledge, wisdom, action and management activities have multiple circular relationships
the same highway, the same high-end car, different drivers will drive a completely different level, at this time the more critical factor - driving ability is very important. In the initial stage, the competition is extensive. It may mainly depend on who can repair the road and buy a good car. To the back, everybody
refers to the basic concept and scope of information technology< In fact, it has three levels: the first level is hardware, which mainly refers to the host and network communication equipment for data storage, processing and transmission; The second layer refers to software, including various kinds of software that can be used to collect, store, retrieve, analyze, apply and evaluate information. It includes business management software such as ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), CRM (Customer Relationship Management), SCM (Supply Chain Management), WF (workflow) management software that can be used to strengthen process management DW / DM (data warehouse and data mining) software for auxiliary analysis, etc; The third layer refers to the application, which refers to the collection, storage, retrieval, analysis, application, evaluation and use of various kinds of information, including the application of ERP, CRM, SCM and other software to directly assist decision-making, and the use of other decision-making analysis models or DW / DM and other technical means to further improve the quality of analysis and assist decision-makers to make decisions (emphasis on one point, only to assist rather than replace decision-making). Some people understand that it combines the first two layers into one, which refers to the storage, processing and transmission of information, while the latter refers to the application of information; Some people combine the latter two layers into one, and then divide them into hard front and soft back. Generally, the third layer has not been paid enough attention, but in fact, only when the information is effectively applied, can the value of it be brought into full play and the goal of informatization be truly realized. Informatization itself is not a goal, it is just a better means to achieve the goal in the current era
What does Carl mean by it? In that article, he did not explicitly mention it, but he mentioned the core functions of information technology -- data storage, processing and transmission. From the logic of his reasoning, that is, from the steam engine, railway, Telegraph and telephone, electric power and other infrastructure construction, we also use Moore's law to prove the development of mainframe and optical fiber. If he stops here and only starts from this point, his logical argument is very rigorous. Those who later commented on it no longer matters, regardless of their support or opposition, basically agree with this point (except for those hardware and network manufacturers), and the author also agrees with this point. Throughout the article, he paid a lot of attention to the construction of materialized IT infrastructure, and basically did not pay attention to the application level. But later, when he talked about the trend of popularization, he mentioned that "information technology is very easy to ", which pushed it back to commercial software. Here, he has taken a "dangerous" step. When he published the book of the same name in 2004, he defined it from his research and analogy at the beginning. "I use it to refer to all the hardware and software used to store, process and transmit information in digital form in the general sense. In particular, I only refer to the technology itself, What I mean by "it" does not include the information flowing in technology and the skills of those who use technology. "So what he means by it is the first two layers. If this stop, there may not be too much controversy (this time plus those uncomfortable software manufacturers). Objectively analyzing the characteristics of the software itself, it is true that there are three of the four criteria for judging whether the software does not have the core competitiveness, namely, scarcity, not easy to , and not easy to replace. Karl himself does not deny and emphasizes the fourth criterion for judging whether it has the core competitiveness, that is, value. But he just set the title as "it is no longer important", and wanted to beat the whole it to death
it's a pity that he is often confused about the concept of it: sometimes he refers to the host network, and then he goes to the software. In his later published books, he often "accidentally" steps to the third level, which completely violates the scope of it defined by him at the beginning of the book, such as discussing the application of information technology, questioning CIO, etc. Many readers, including the editor of Harvard Business Review, pointed out this at that time. Many other people attacked him because of this. Some even said that Karl didn't know it at all, which might be true, because he didn't do it at all. This also gives us a lot of inspiration and vigilance. We should be very careful when we apply other methods to the fields we are not familiar with, otherwise we will make a lot of jokes
here, I would like to emphasize that there are often software manufacturers (both at home and abroad) who claim that they can do what they want with informatization and strengthen the core competitiveness of enterprises (anyway, most of them follow what is popular now and "keep pace with the times"). I don't know whether they are intentionally or unintentionally, and they don't infer from the four criteria of core competitiveness. Let's ask a few simple questions: what can we do if we use informatization? How many enterprises that use informatization have lost money or even closed down? Especially software companies that claim to have hundreds of thousands of customers using their software should ask themselves. If the information can be used, can we automatically increase sales and rece inventory if we assume that all the information such as stock in, stock out, sales and inventory is accurate? If the boss may be confused because he can't see before he went to informatization, but he lives happily, what about now? Just painful to know that there are so many inventory in the warehouse for such a long time, so many goods occupy the counter for a long time, but did not bring any sales, let alone profit! This paper analyzes the phenomenon that software manufacturers publicize that "information technology is the core competitiveness of enterprises". There are only two conclusions: either these enterprises do not understand what is the core competitiveness (I think most of them still understand it, I hope they understand it and I hope they do not understand it, I hope that the result is to understand, because at least software companies can understand some management concepts, rather than immerse themselves in a purely technical company. I hope that the result is not to understand, because it can be less attacked by others, without professional ethics, it is not too much for those who do not know). There is a serious problem of information asymmetry between general enterprise customers and IT enterprises. The final result of the game between IT enterprises and enterprise customers is often the second best choice, which is called "lemon effect". In this regard, in addition to IT enterprises and employees to improve their professional ethics, the government or instry must strengthen the training and ecation of information construction, improve the enterprise's understanding of information construction, and introce management consulting companies and supervision companies to change the outcome of the game, so as to achieve a new balance and promote the healthy development of IT instry
information technology itself is just a tool, just like a sword or a good pen. Buying it doesn't necessarily guarantee how much you can improve your martial arts and how beautiful your handwriting is. It also requires you to constantly practice how to dance sword and how to write. Information construction also requires you to constantly improve your ability to use information, which is the real core and the most difficult part. Kung Fu is out of the question! The purpose of informatization (digitization) is not to take a few numbers from the system, it is just the foundation, and its core lies in the word "Hua", which integrates all kinds of resource related information to carry out "rationalization" and "optimization" configuration. For example, use historical information to assist in sales forecast, purchase plan, proction plan, distribution plan and inventory plan, issue instructions according to these plans, and revise plans according to actual operation. The computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) put forward by Dr. Joseph Harrington of the United States contains two basic viewpoints: one is that all links of enterprise proction, including market analysis, proct design, processing and manufacturing, operation and management, and after-sales service, are an inseparable whole, which must be closely linked and considered in a unified way; the other is that all links of enterprise proction, including market analysis, proct design, processing and manufacturing, operation and management, and after-sales service, are inseparable from each other; Second, the whole operation process is essentially a process of data collection, transmission and processing, and the final proct can be regarded as the material expression of data. If the information system is used to assist decision-making, or operates according to the original operation mode, the role of the information system may be limited to liberating some jobs of some posts, such as statistical reports, and at the same time, it will increase the work of other posts. A large number of experiences show that it is impossible to achieve accurate, timely and complete information for decision-making without the data collected by information system. Only by using it can information system graally improve its accuracy, timeliness and integrity. According to the evaluation standard of core competence, in order to construct core competence, only integration ability is essential, and the more explicit the ability is, the easier it is to be imitated. At the tip of the iceberg, the less exposed it is, the less likely it is to be imitated, and the more likely it is to form a core competitiveness
as Hal Varian, editor of Harvard Business Review, pointed out: "Carl is right to say that it is being commercialized and no longer provides competitive advantage. But knowing how to use it effectively is still a very scarce skill. "“ It's not it that provides competitive advantage, it's people who know how to use it effectively. "“ Companies spend thousands of money on data storage and access to customer transaction data, but a lot of data is lying there, not analyzed, not used, but in the hands of trained analysts, the same data can proce huge returns! " This is an era of rich data, but at the same time, it is an era of poor knowledge<
Thomas H. Davenport, Professor of information systems management at Boston University School of management, wants to describe "the past 40 years as the 'data age' rather than the 'information age'", "transforming data into something more useful requires a lot of human investment and wisdom, but most organizations only look at this problem from the perspective of technology. It is necessary to have a database or data mining system as well as other technologies, but it is not enough for high-quality information and knowledge
therefore, it is necessary to clarify some basic concepts that are often confused
data = the actual record shows that the sales volume of series a procts in East China in the previous quarter was 1.2 million
information = (information) = data + meaning. The sales of series a procts in East China in the previous quarter decreased by 25% compared with the same period last year
intelligence = information + understanding and reasoning. For example, is it because the sales units in East China are not good, or a series of procts have entered a recession, or the company's overall marketing activities are backward and competitors' strong promotion? Or other reasons
knowledge = problem solving skills. What is the company's strategy to deal with this problem
wisdom = selection of knowledge there may be many action plans to deal with, but which * wisdom (strategy) to choose. Action will generate new trading data
data, information, intelligence, knowledge, wisdom, action and management activities have multiple circular relationships
the same highway, the same high-end car, different drivers will drive a completely different level, at this time the more critical factor - driving ability is very important. In the initial stage, the competition is extensive. It may mainly depend on who can repair the road and buy a good car. To the back, everybody
Hot content