Full text of blockchain 94
how many stages is the blockchain divided into 8194;
there are 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 blockchains, and the digital currency dominated by bitcoin is blockchain 1.0; The smart contract platform centered on Ethernet is blockchain 2.0; The application scenario and platform of high-performance blockchain is blockchain 3.0. The simple conclusion is that 1.0 is mining and currency speculation; 2.0 is ICO and currency; 3.0 is the implementation of the project. The real landing projects are still far away from us. Most projects take stage 2.0 as the entry point of instry solutions. The combination of blockchain and instry enables blockchain to be applied in a certain instry 8194;
how to be a qualified blockchain project 8194;
potential blockchain projects have different evaluation standards and different periods. The main reason for the outbreak of digital currency in 2017 is the promotion of ICO and Ethernet smart contract. In the past, projects that could meet these two conditions were considered good. Now, the measurement standard of projects is: &
(1) There are application scenarios. The project itself has team, goal and real scene application. Because some teams or enterprises are not suitable for blockchain applications, it is a rather crude way to establish a connection between them 8194; 8194; 8194; 8194; 8194;
(2) the multi parties involved in the blockchain can generate transactions
(3) blockchain has a large number of communities and users. In conclusion, good blockchain projects can be applied
refer to the case of Henan keoo Information Technology Co., Ltd
according to the development of blockchain, it can be divided into three stages:
blockchain 1.0 stage: when the digital currency represented by bitcoin first appeared, it was probably from 2008 to 2014
blockchain 2.0 stage: from the birth of Ethereum to the eve of "94 event" in 2017, this is the development era of smart contract and blockchain
blockchain stage 3.0: after the "94 event", we began to pay attention to the exploration and development of blockchain applications and reshape the technology and value of blockchain
although blockchain technology has been widely recognized, people still cannot do without digital currency. After all, the underlying technology of digital currency is blockchain. Even though the non currency blockchain on the alliance chain can be advocated by mainstream regulators, it is much more difficult than the real decentralized blockchain such as public chain projects. What technology geeks pursue are often more difficult decentralized projects
therefore, digital currency will not be destroyed, which is the development trend. As for how you say to play, maybe you are asking how to play digital currency instead of blockchain? If you really want to deepen the understanding, you may as well go to Citex (big C network) to have a look, hope to adopt, thank you.
1 - Open blockchain
2 - Collaborative blockchain
3 - private blockchain.
mu77 novice Gift Pack: 202sbpabw
imagine that in Byzantine times, there was a rich city-state with all kinds of gold, silver, jewelry, silk and satin, and its Lord Doraemon enjoyed all the luxury and glory. On the outskirts of the city-state, four Byzantine Generals, Daxiong, panghu, Xiaofu and Jingxiang, coveted Doraemon's wealth, so they decided to join hands to capture Doraemon's city-state. According to the strength comparison between the two sides, more than half of the generals must attack at the same time to defeat the enemy, so the winning condition is that at least three of the four can agree on the attack time. What are the odds of the four generals
the answer to this question depends on the cooperation mode of the four people. If it is a centralized system and there is an alliance leader, such as panghu (equivalent to a central server), then there is no doubt about their victory, because it is very easy to reach an agreement on the attack time. As long as panghu calls Daxiong, Xiaofu and Jingxiang to have a meeting to discuss it, Even if we have different opinions, panghu can make a final decision. Now let's go back to the assumption of Byzantine Generals. In a distributed network without trust, what are the odds of four generals winning< br />
?
first of all, e to the lack of trust between the four generals, the possibility of gathering in a small dark room for a conspiracy meeting is ruled out (what if they are kidnapped by panghu in a small dark room?); Secondly, since there is no leader, the opinions of all four people will be equally valued. In this case, the four generals could only negotiate the attack time by sending messages between their camps by messenger. For example, if Daxiong thinks 6 a.m. is a good time to launch an attack, he will send messengers to tell panghu, Xiaofu and Jingxiang their opinions. At the same time, panghu may think it's better to launch a surprise attack at 9 p.m., Xiaofu prefers to launch an attack at 3 p.m., and Jingxiang hopes that it will be 10 a.m., and the three of them will send their own messengers at the same time. In this way, after the first round of communication, each of the four generals had four attack times to choose from, and each of them had to inform the other three of their chosen time in the next round of communication. Because four people make decisions independently, there are 256 possible final choices. Only when more than three people choose the same time can consensus be reached, and there are only 64 such results, that is to say, the probability of reaching consensus is only 1 / 4. This is only the case of four generals. What if the number of generals is 10, 100 or 1000? With a little calculation, we can see that as the number of people increases, the hope of reaching a consensus will become increasingly dim
change the general in the above example into the node in the computer network, the messenger into the communication between nodes, and the attack time into the information that needs to reach a consensus. Then you can understand the dilemma described by the consensus problem. The ability to reach a consensus is self-evident for a payment system. If you remit a sum of money to your family to buy a car and go to the bank the next day for verification, the counter will tell you "about how much money you remit, there are three versions of records in our system". Obviously, you dare not deposit money in such a bank. Before the emergence of bitcoin, the consensus problem is difficult to be solved perfectly. In order to reach a consensus, we need to adopt a centralized system (unless the nodes meet certain conditions), and in order to decentralize the consensus, we can't guarantee it. So how does blockchain technology solve this problem Pay attention to the official account weoption, reply to "block chain", you can view the full text.
According to a number of financial media reports, the queen of England seems to be very interested in blockchain technology. The reason is that the British blockchain Association, a non-profit organization, sent a magazine to the queen about blockchain research. The queen learned that this is the first open blockchain research journal to be printed and published at the same time for online reading. The magazine received a reply from the private secretary of the Queen's office, expressing her interest
so what is blockchain< I think it is a technology, a decentralized distributed ledger database, which is composed of different data I have the following views on this:
first, it is a technologyblockchain is a technology, but many people do not understand what kind of technology it is. For example, when shopping on an e-commerce platform, there are sellers and buyers, as well as this e-commerce platform, the blockchain technology is to replace this e-commerce platform
now a lot of technology updates have attracted a lot of people to invest in it. However, without understanding the whole technology itself, it is recommended to be cautious to avoid losing money
What do you think of this? Welcome to tell me in the comments section< strong>