Open source blockchain project recommendation

1.

In the past, when it comes to blockchain, we always think of foreign procts, such as Ethereum. But when I talk about this topic today, I think more about China's own blockchain technology

at present, the mature application of blockchain technology is more concentrated in some public chain projects, because many application projects need to be developed based on this, so I think the current global landing direction is public chain projects, and it is still too early to talk about maturity. After all, bitcoin and Ethereum are still blocked, and many old problems have not been solved, There will be many new problems. The well-known ones are Biyuan chain, ulord (the project is abroad, but the technical party provides it in the domestic company, Hunan Tianhe Guoyun Co., Ltd.), quantum chain, Xiaoyi Neo, gongxinbao, etc

ulord is a point-to-point value delivery public chain. By building the underlying architecture of blockchain and digital resource distribution protocol, it supports third-party developers to build their own applications on top of their open source protocol, and works with many instry partners to build a complete ecosystem of blockchain technology and applications

based on various rules and protocols created by ulord, it is convenient to graft various digital resource application scenarios including text, pictures, music, video, software, etc., providing a direct docking platform for information creators and consumers. Third party developers can build their own economic system in ulord, or focus on building all kinds of applications around ulord, and use the ulordtoken in ulord as the voucher in the system

for example, an experience sharing platform can be built on ulord, where the experience sharers price the published experience, and the people who obtain the experience information trade on the platform, and each fee paid to the experience sharers will arrive at the account immediately; Proct promoters can publish ads on ulord, price ads, and people who are interested in ads can get certain profits by clicking on ads. The first mock exam is to separate information from the past, and to use platform or other centralized organizations to spread profit. This mode eliminates intermediate links, and information providers and consumers directly connect with Ulord, which ensures the maximization of the interests of the originator. p>

2. The public chain, as the name suggests, has great inclusiveness and fairness. The better the public chain project does in these two aspects, the more prominent it will be. At present, many public chains sacrifice fairness in order to speed up the transaction, which is not optimistic. There is a project called Fanta network. Their DSC technology claims to be safe, democratic and fair, which deserves long-term attention. However, their code will not be open source until the end of the year, and the progress needs to be accelerated

3. First of all, I'd like to introce some well-known blockchain companies in China, and then I'll personally evaluate which one is good. You can judge for yourself

1. Bubi blockchain company, which is engaged in the underlying technical services and instry solutions of blockchain. That is to say, an underlying blockchain is built, and an adaptation layer is built on it, so that enterprises can quickly establish commercial applications. The underlying blockchain is self-developed. The consensus mechanism is pbft, TPS is 5000 transactions per second, UnionPay is 2000 transactions per second, and bitcoin is 7 transactions per second. Of course, different underlying architectures lead to different performance, because Bubi's commercial blockchain pays more attention to performance. At present, Bubi is mainly used in digital assets, supply chain finance, supply chain traceability, public notary and other fields< 2. Bumeng blockchain. Theoretically, bumeng should be regarded as the proct line of Bubi, but Bubi is mainly engaged in the private chain, while bumeng is an alliance chain. So separately, bumeng is Bubi's layout in digital assets. The underlying technology is Bubi blockchain, but it encapsulates the blockchain according to the scene and provides API interface for enterprises. Enterprises issue their own assets on it. According to the characteristics of blockchain, they can freely circulate their assets. At present, some enterprises such as sunshine insurance, Qianxiang finance, crowdsourcing, Haohuo, etc. have joined in, and the assets in them include insurance policies, integral points, and so on Financial procts and so on. Finally, it is estimated that this platform will break through the barriers between assets, and the end users can freely use and transfer these assets. This is an interesting way for the blockchain instry, because it has both the opening of public chain and the security of private chain

Third, only chain, which is a commodity ID management cloud platform based on blockchain technology, provides enterprise users with commodity asset management, tracing, anti-counterfeiting verification, new supply chain management, etc. in the form of baas. Simple understanding is that only chain has done the content of "supply chain traceability" of Bubi blockchain

four, concentric mutual aid, concentric mutual aid is a mutual aid security platform, put some mutual insurance related information into the blockchain, and users can apply to become nodes, participate in bookkeeping, and maintain their own data

5. Xiaoyi is a decentralized network protocol based on blockchain technology, which digitizes the assets and interests of the real world, and carries out financial business such as registration and issuance, transfer transaction, clearing and delivery through point-to-point network

these five blockchain companies are probably well-known in China, and I personally recommend bumeng

first, bumeng uses the underlying technology of Bubi blockchain, which is very promising in the instry. It has the largest number of landing applications in China. Enterprises can not only use the blockchain technology at low cost (just call the interface, it seems that it is free), but also use the resources inside. Think about being on the same chain with many enterprises and docking resources in the future, User transformation should not be easy

Second, Weilian and Tongxin Huzhu focus on one field, and do not provide underlying technology and instry solutions. That is to say, if you are in this instry or can be used in the upstream and downstream of this instry, you can not be used in other fields. Take mutual security field as an example, zhongtuobang and zebra Club both choose bumeng. Of course, if it is an investment, you can consider it

Third, Xiaoyi, why not recommend Xiaoyi, because Xiaoyi is an open source project, and we all know the domestic business environment, especially when the instry is just beginning to develop, and the domestic market is different from that of foreign countries, Xiaoyi has gone through two rounds of ICO, which will be a great worry in the future operation, and at present, Xiaoyi has not been applied in practice, We have made a Fada platform, which has not been used by any company yet (guess it may be related to the factors of open source, who dares to open their data completely). Of course, the open attitude of Xiaoyi is worth encouraging. Although I guess the advantages and disadvantages of the code are well understood by peers, it is not clear

Fourth, why is there no recommendation for Bubby? Bubby has raised 30 million yuan a while ago, because Bubby is more open and has more resources. Of course, if the business requires high privacy, it can also choose Bubby blockchain

finally, for all my hard work, choose me!

4. I just want to say what I know better. One is an open source project based on bitcoin system, called cravecoin, and the other is Ethereum. At the beginning, we chose cravecoin for source code analysis, and wanted to carry out secondary development on top of it. However, because Ethereum is more open and well supports smart contracts, we gave up after analyzing for a while
after entering the research of Ethereum, I wanted to start from the underlying source code at the beginning, but the whole process was rather difficult. After re analyzing our requirements, I felt that we could develop to some extent and meet some needs by using its existing interface, so I translated the comments of the source code, basically understood the role of each mole, and no further modification was needed, After all, Ethereum is also a project that took dozens of big bulls a long time to build.
it is very difficult for us to successfully transform it into what we want in a period of time. The faster, the easier, the better
and there is a very important problem. If Ethereum is changed, it will not be able to connect to its public network and use the second largest amount of computing power in the world. This is a matter of putting the cart before the horse. It seems that the answer is wrong, but the main expression is that if the subject wants to do development, it is enough to carefully analyze a project,
after all, the logic is almost the same. We should learn more about blockchain and pay attention to ATV