Gene pig blockchain

1. In the food instry, blockchain can monitor the proction and growth of crops and animals, and control the abuse of pesticide hormones, so as to ensure the quality,

2. There's a mining machine in the cave. You can get ore for 10 gold coins, but sometimes you can't

3. At present, we see an essay competition launched by GTA gene chain. It is introced that GTA has created a precedent of blockchain, led the development and reform of blockchain 3.0 era, built a business closed loop driven by blockchain technology and built a revolutionary business ecosystem with the mission of human health and well-being. Since GTA landed in China, it has attracted strong attention from all walks of life, fans and high praise from the instry. The strong value consensus has made the GTA gene chain develop and rise rapidly. At present, the Chinese community of GTA has recruited 100 super nodes, and has rapidly expanded in Shanghai, Chongqing, Xi'an, Shijiazhuang, Lanzhou and other regions of China, and achieved outstanding results.

4. Bitcoin is in the blockchain

5. Enterprise competitiveness evaluation method is divided into single index evaluation method and comprehensive index system evaluation method
the single index evaluation method is to directly compare the value of a single index of an enterprise in the reporting period with that in the base period, or draw corresponding conclusions by comparing the actual value of the same index of different enterprises. For example, the textile instry association released the top 100 textile sales revenue and top 100 export enterprises, which is characterized by reflecting the business performance of enterprises from a certain aspect. It is very intuitive, clear and easy to operate. As long as the data is accurate, the ranking is very simple. The limitation of single index evaluation is also obvious. No matter how important an index is, it can not describe the comprehensive competitive strength of an enterprise
the comprehensive index system evaluation method is different. It first synthesizes a number of indexes to form a comprehensive index, and then draws the corresponding conclusion according to the comprehensive index value. Compared with the single index evaluation method, the comprehensive index system evaluation method is much more complex. Many experts are studying which indicators to adopt, how to determine the weight and how to constitute the system. Up to now, there are at least 20 methods to evaluate the competitiveness of enterprises. Here we focus on the comprehensive index evaluation method
comprehensive index evaluation method is a comprehensive index system evaluation method. The evaluation method is: the first step is to determine the weight of the evaluation project. As the index system is multi-level, it requires that the sum of the weights of the first level system is 1, and the sum of the items in each subsystem is 1. At present, the method of determining the weights mostly adopts the subjective method of expert consultation. The second step is to calculate the comprehensive average index of each subsystem. For positive indicators, the reporting period is directly compared with the base period; For the inverse index, first calculate its reciprocal value, and then use the same method to calculate the "indivial index", finally use the pre-determined project weight to weighted average them, and get the average index of subsystem comprehensive evaluation. In the third step, the average index of each subsystem is weighted to get the comprehensive average index. It includes several sub elements, such as the statistical index reflecting the input of proction factors, the statistical index reflecting the output level of enterprises, the financial benefit (economic benefit) status of enterprises, the asset operation status of enterprises, the debt level and solvency of enterprises, the statistical index reflecting the development potential of enterprises, the index reflecting the international competitiveness of enterprises, and the service ability of enterprises. On this basis, we can establish a mathematical model to reflect the competitiveness of enterprises. The evaluation criteria are: if the comprehensive average index is close to 1, there is no obvious difference between the two enterprises; If the composite average index is greater than 1, then enterprise a is better than enterprise B; If the composite average index is less than 1, then enterprise a is inferior to enterprise B. The larger the deviation between the comprehensive average index and 1, the more obvious the difference between different enterprises. Therefore, enterprises can compare with each other according to the comprehensive average index, determine their position in the same instry, and formulate their own development strategy
how to establish the index system of enterprise competitiveness
to select those indexes to construct the index system of enterprise competitiveness, experts have proposed the following five principles:
1. The principle of purpose. The purpose of designing the evaluation index system of enterprise competitiveness is to measure the situation of enterprise competitiveness, find out the reasons for the weak competitiveness of enterprises, and point out the means and methods to improve the competitiveness of enterprises, so as to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises. For example, in order to guide the textile enterprises to improve their competitiveness, experts highlight the optimization of "innovation ability" and "enterprise human resources" in the guiding ideology when designing the index system. Relatively speaking, "market share" is less emphasized. The purpose of doing so is to guide enterprises to work hard to become "strong" instead of pursuing the "dinosaur like" boss. Although dinosaurs are huge, they do not adapt to the living environment and are exterminated instead
2. Scientific principle. The index system of enterprise competitiveness should accurately reflect the actual situation of enterprise competitiveness, which is concive to the comparison between enterprises and their competitors at home and abroad, and tap the competitive potential
3. The principle of comprehensiveness. The evaluation of enterprise competitiveness should fully consider the obvious and potential competitiveness of enterprises. We should not only reflect the "hard" index of enterprise competitiveness, but also consider the "soft" index of enterprise competitiveness
4. The principle of combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. For qualitative indicators, we should make clear their meaning and assign values according to certain standards, so that they can appropriately reflect the nature of indicators. Both qualitative index and quantitative index must have clear concept and exact calculation method
5. The principle of combination of generality and development. The established index system must have a wide range of adaptability, that is, the established index can reflect the common competitiveness of enterprises in different categories and instries. The established competitiveness index must be developmental, which can be adjusted appropriately according to specific instries and enterprises, so as to be applied flexibly. For example, according to the different situations of various textile sub instries, the weight of indicators can be adjusted to reflect the characteristics of different instries more accurately.

6. Modern enterprise is the most advanced form of enterprise organization in modern market economy society and the mainstream development trend in the future. The four most prominent characteristics of modern enterprises are the separation of owners and operators, the possession of modern technology, the implementation of modern management and the expansion of enterprise scale
especially when the country encounters major natural disasters, it mainly depends on how much money large enterprises (private and private) have donated, and how much responsibility enterprises have to exercise to the society. To a certain extent, this is reasonable, but not all. There are various forms for enterprises to exercise their social responsibility and contribution
therefore, it is necessary for the public to take a comprehensive and objective view of enterprises and make a comprehensive analysis of their social responsibilities and obligations in a relatively long period of time, so as to determine the value of enterprises' contribution to society.

7. 1、 The principles of enterprise competitiveness evaluation are as follows: (1) the evaluation of index system must have the function of prompting enterprises to pay attention to financial objectives, pay attention to financial performance and abide by financial discipline 2) The design of the index system must be connected with the existing accounting and statistics system, and its calculation basis data should be easily obtained from the existing accounting data of enterprises 3) Scientific and reasonable. Among the indicators, there is no repetition in the economic content, and they should cooperate with each other in the interpretation function 4) It is easy to operate. The calculation of indicators should be simple, the number of indicators should not be too many, and the meaning of indicators should be accurate and clear. 2、 The comprehensive evaluation of enterprises should be based on financial objectives and financial discipline to verify the financial performance of enterprises, including 10 aspects: 1) the ratio of labor input to output; 2; ② Asset occupancy and achievement ratio; ③ The ratio of operating expenses to income; ④ The ratio of paid in capital to income; ⑤ The change of economic scale; ⑥ Operating efficiency; ⑦ Financial strength; ⑧ Solvency; ⑨ Contribution level; ⑩ Abide by the law. 1. The ratio of labor input to output
labor input and labor output can be expressed in many ways. After repeated comparison, we choose "total wage payment" and "added value" to make the ratio of labor input to output a comprehensive index reflecting proction efficiency
wage value added rate = instrial value added / total wages paid × 100%
reflects how much added value is provided by paying 1 yuan salary
2. Asset occupancy and achievement ratio
in order to make this index more general and have a proper division of labor with other indicators in reflecting economic content, we select two indicators: "average balance of assets" and "profit before tax and interest"
return on assets = profit before tax and interest / average balance of assets × 100%
reflects the profit level of 1 yuan assets
3. The ratio of operating expenses to income
operating expenses refer to the costs and expenses incurred in the proction and operation of an enterprise in a certain period of time. Theoretically speaking, it can be expressed by a variety of indicators. By comparison, the more suitable indicator for the ratio of operating expenses to income is the sum of the delivery cost of finished procts and the period cost, which is referred to as the total cost
operating income refers to the operating income and cash income of an enterprise in a certain period of time. In order to make the meaning of indicators correct, we choose "operating profit". In accounting, operating profit is the sum of basic business profit and other business profit (period expenses have been dected)
in this way, the calculation formula of the ratio of operating expenses to income is:
cost expense profit rate = operating profit / total cost expense × 100%
reflects the level of reward obtained by spending 1 yuan
4
the main purpose of setting this indicator is to reflect the profitability of prepaid capital
advance capital is represented by the following indicators: (1) paid in capital; ② The sum of paid in capital and capital reserve; ③ Owner's equity; ④ "Owner's equity decting public welfare fund". We believe that to determine the standard expression index of advanced capital, we must make clear the main significance of advanced capital in the evaluation index. According to our assumption, the "advanced capital" included in the enterprise evaluation index refers to the part of the capital that has the right to share the enterprise's after tax profits, or "the reason why the shareholders become the enterprise's shareholders is the amount of shareholders' capital contribution" and "the rate of return on advanced capital", which indicates how much the enterprise can pay after the shareholders' capital contribution in a certain period of time. Therefore, in the index of the ratio of capital to income, the correct form of paid in capital should be "paid in capital"
generally, there are the following indicators for the income of paid in capital: 1; ② After tax profit; ③ After tax profit after drawing surplus accumulation fund; ④ The balance of net assets at the beginning and end of the period; ⑤ Dividends distributed. In order to have a reasonable division of labor between this index and related indexes in expressing the specific functions of enterprises' economic activities, we choose "after tax profit"< In this way, the specific index of the ratio of paid in capital to income is:
return on capital = after tax profit / paid in capital × 100%
reflects the level of reward obtained from the advance of 1 yuan of capital< There are many ways to express the change of economic scale in practice, and people's definition of it is not clear. Specifically: the number of employees; Total assets; Total proct proction; Total sales revenue; Realize profit; Instrial net output value or added value; Total profits and taxes, etc
after comparison, we think that "total sales revenue" is the most appropriate expression for the change of enterprise economic scale. First, it is an international practice. The United States and other developed countries generally rank enterprises according to "sales revenue"; Second, in the market environment, sales revenue means that the society recognizes that the enterprise has the market share, which is the effective economic scale of the enterprise; Third, sales revenue is the final total achievement of an enterprise, a comprehensive indicator of social recognition of enterprise value, and a fully realized proction value. Therefore, choosing "sales revenue" as a comprehensive index to measure the change of enterprise economic scale is in line with the basic requirements of "totality", "Finality", "effectiveness" and "objectivity" in measuring enterprise economic scale, while other indexes can not fully possess these characteristics
sales scale change rate = sales revenue of the current period / sales revenue of the previous period × 100%
compared with the previous period, the sales scale of the current period has expanded (more than 1) or decreased (less than 1)
6. Operating efficiency.
we will discuss the appropriate index of enterprise operating efficiency as follows
(1) it is represented by "turnover rate". This is a common practice, including accounts receivable turnover, inventory turnover, current asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, total asset turnover, etc. However, as the above analysis shows, we have designed the return on assets index, and the return on assets index has included the total asset turnover index. Therefore, in our index system, it is no longer appropriate to use "turnover rate" to express the operating efficiency of enterprises. Otherwise, there will be repetition of the contents reflected in the evaluation indexes
(2) it is expressed by proctivity index. Specifically, it includes the total labor proctivity, equipment utilization, raw material utilization, labor proctivity of proction workers, etc. Because there is a derivative index of "proctivity" named "wage value added rate" in our index system, it is not suitable to choose "proctivity" index for operating efficiency
(3) it is expressed by the index of "proction and marketing balance rate". The general way is: proct sales value ÷ Total instrial output value × 100%, which reflects the degree of social recognition of the enterprise's proction achievements in a certain period, objectively reflects the enterprise's operating efficiency, and does not plicate other indicators in the expression sense of our designed index system, so it is an ideal index to show the enterprise's operating efficiency
7. Financial strength
financial strength is the actual financial ability of an enterprise, and the comprehensive performance of the enterprise's operation ability and development ability. During the discussion, some comrades put forward the following indicators to express the financial strength of enterprises
(1) the scale of self owned funds. It is believed that if the scale of self owned capital is large and accounts for a large proportion of the total assets of the enterprise, it will have financial strength
(2) long term capital scale. Long term capital = long-term liabilities + owner's equity. It is believed that this part of funds can be used by enterprises for a long time, and its proportion in assets will reflect the strength of enterprises' financial strength< (3) effective capital scale. Effective capital = owner's equity - intangible assets - other assets - pending property losses. Only this part of capital truly represents the ability of an enterprise to be responsible for its own profits and losses. Its size and proportion in the total assets are comprehensive indicators to measure whether an enterprise has financial strength or not< (4) the scale of foreign investment. The financial strength of modern enterprises is not only reflected in the amount of disposable funds on the books, but also in the ability of external expansion and self-development< (5) the scale of external financing. It is believed that the continuous expansion of an enterprise's external financing scale shows that the enterprise has good credit, and all sectors of the society believe in its strong financial strength. More objective and comprehensive< (6) the scale of paid in capital. It is considered that the scale of paid in capital is large and accounts for a large proportion of the total assets, indicating that the financial strength of the enterprise is strong
(7) total amount of monetary capital. It is considered that the enterprise has a certain scale of monetary capital, which can ensure that it will not be troubled by insufficient ability to pay in the short term, and it is the basis of the financial strength of the enterprise
(8) high profit proct income ratio or export income ratio. Experience shows that if these two indicators are high, the financial situation of the enterprise will not deteriorate, and there will be no worries about the ability to pay in the long run
(9) technology development cost ratio. The proportion of technology development cost in the business income of an enterprise comprehensively reflects the economic development potential of the enterprise and the current financial strength of the enterprise. All the enterprises with high ratio of technology development cost are those with good prospects and strong financial strength
(10) self accumulation rate. The calculation formula is: the surplus reserve withdrawn in the current period ÷ Instrial output × 100％ It is believed that the high ratio will certainly enhance the financial strength of the enterprise; On the contrary, it shows that enterprises are short of financial resources and difficult to achieve economic development and expansion
(11) fund adequacy ratio“ Accumulated surplus ÷ Paid in capital × 100％” It is considered as a comprehensive indicator of the enterprise's abundant capital and smooth financial resources. According to the company law, if the index value reaches 50%, it indicates that the financial strength of the enterprise is the strongest, and if it is lower than 25%, it indicates that the financial strength of the enterprise is weak
(12) repayment ability. The repayment ability is the ratio of "the actual repayment amount in the current period" and "the repayment amount in the current period". Ratio ≥ 1 indicates the financial strength of the enterprise; The smaller the ratio is, the weaker the financial strength is
(13) capital appreciation capacity or net asset size. Net assets are the balance of assets less liabilities. The larger the amount is, the stronger the financial strength is; On the contrary, it will weaken the financial strength of the enterprise, and eventually make the enterprise in the plight of shrinking operation
after comparative analysis, according to the principle of selecting specific indicators proposed in this paper, we believe that it is more appropriate to reflect the financial strength of an enterprise with the indicator of "scale and growth of net assets". The rest of the indicators, or with our design of the index system in the expression of other indicators in the sense of repetition, or expression is too indirect, or can not fully accurately reflect the financial strength of the enterprise, therefore, we give up
growth rate of net assets = net assets at the end of the period / net assets at the beginning of the period × 100%
more than 100% indicates that the financial strength of the enterprise is strengthened; Less than 100% indicates that the financial strength of the enterprise is weakened. Solvency and profitability are two basic fields in traditional enterprise evaluation. In the long-term evaluation practice, as described above, people have explored a lot of indicators to reflect the solvency of enterprises. However, in our evaluation index system, we can't all the solvency indexes in the current enterprise evaluation without reservation. We can only make a choice between the existing solvency indexes according to the evaluation objectives. By comparison, I

8. Trade competitiveness index, namely TC (trade competitiveness) index, is one of the commonly used measurement indexes in the analysis of international competitiveness. It represents the proportion of a country's import and export trade balance in the total import and export trade, that is, TC index = (export import) / (export + import). As a relative value of total trade, the index excludes the influence of macroeconomic factors such as economic inflation and inflation. That is to say, no matter what the absolute volume of import and export is, the index is between - 1 and 1
the closer its value is to 0, the closer its competitiveness is to the average level; When the index is - 1, it means that the instry only imports but not exports. The closer to - 1, the weaker the competitiveness; When the index is 1, it means that the instry only exports but does not import. The closer it is to 1, the more competitive it is.

9. The index system of brand competitiveness includes three basic indexes and a comprehensive index. The three basic indexes are the consumer market share of the brand, the consumer loyalty of the brand and the growth index of the brand. According to these three indexes, a comprehensive index, namely the brand competitiveness index, can be calculated. As a comprehensive reflection of brand market share, brand loyalty and brand growth indicators, the calculation formula of brand competitiveness index is as follows: the competitiveness index of a brand = relative market share × customer loyalty × Brand growth index × 100

10. It's a bug. I know where you're stuck. It's on the top of the right side. The left side is the wall, and the right side is the cliff. You can't get out of it for a year. You can't fly if you leave that area alone