Can blockchain be separated from network environment
in short, blockchain is a community-based technology, which can make value exchange more secure. Blockchain is their name
therefore, chain operation has a huge impact on the people, creating the greatest value for the enterprise and bringing more convenience to the people strong>
coinbase transaction is a special transaction that generates bitcoin "out of thin air". Only miners can write this kind of transaction, and the number of generated bitcoin is limited by rules (new currency reced by half for every 210000 blocks + transaction fee for this block)
however, the rules do not stipulate that the miner must take away all the rewards that can be taken, and can choose not to take them
therefore, a mine pool connected with the RSK side chain has made a bug before, forgetting to take away the reward and occupying a pit in a block for nothing, which is equivalent to destroying the corresponding amount of bitcoin, making the total amount of bitcoin decrease a little bit permanently
in addition, to spend a bitcoin, you only need to specify the transaction ID and output serial number
as like as two peas in multiple blocks repeatedly write identical coinbase transactions, the transaction ID is also repeated.
therefore, this kind of situation also occupies the pit of a block in vain, and permanently destroys the corresponding amount of bitcoin
it seems to me that this is still a security vulnerability, so the new version of bitcoin software later banned the writing of repeated coinbase transactions. But until now, there has been no ban on miners not getting their e rewards
generally speaking, a coin is controlled by a private key. If a coin is transferred to an address where no one knows the private key, it will be destroyed
if the owner does a good job in security, and the private key is not disclosed and cannot be guessed, but he accidentally loses the private key, it is equivalent to destroying all the coins he owns
there are only some special circumstances that require intentional destruction of coins
one is irreversibly converted into another kind of currency, such as the contract currency XCP attached to bitcoin and wormhole cash WHC attached to BCH
the second is to save certificates and data on the chain, such as the time stamp: panbiao.com/2013/08 /
and the crowd funding of the original Ethereum founding team: zhuanlan.hu.com/p/29
the private key is essentially a big number. Whoever knows this number can control the currency on the corresponding address. So the private key must be generated with reliable random number, otherwise it may be guessed and stolen
compared with the token, the address is the hash of the public key. There is no way to judge whether an address has a corresponding public key and private key (even if the public key is known, the corresponding private key cannot be known). Therefore, even if it is explicitly the address of "burned" token, the system does not prohibit the transfer in
strictly speaking, what locks the currency is a small program (script). This program takes the input as the public key and digital signature. First, check whether the public key hash is consistent, and then check whether the digital signature is valid. If it is valid, it will be verified and transfer is allowed; Otherwise, it will be judged that the transaction is illegal and refuse to package into the chain
it is the whole node software that explains and executes this program. It can be said that the software code of the whole node specifically defines a coin
however, the current situation is very embarrassing. Most miners do not run the whole node, only a few mines are running. The vast majority of users do not run the whole node, even if they run the whole node, they can only perform verification, no computing power, no block
First of all, don't think too much about blockchain. It's a database storage system that is distributed all over the world and can work together. Different from the traditional database operation, where the read and write permissions are controlled by a company or a centralized hand (the centralized feature), blockchain believes that anyone who has the ability to set up a server node can participate in it. Gold diggers from all over the world deploy their own nodes locally and connect to the blockchain network to become a node in the distributed database storage system; Once joined, the node enjoys the same rights and obligations as all other nodes (decentralized, distributed features). At the same time, for those who carry out services on the blockchain, they can read and write to any node in the system. Finally, all nodes in the world will synchronize one after another according to some mechanism, so that the data of all nodes in the blockchain network is completely consistent
blockchain itself is a technology, so it can't be a fraud. Just like the normalized "P2P" finance in recent years, how many fraudsters are wearing the concept of P2P to illegally absorb public funds and cheat people's hard-earned money? But is "P2P" guilty? It's just an indivial to indivial mode of Internet finance. It not only creates profits, but also helps thousands of people get rid of poverty, so as to achieve a win-win situation between the poor and the poor. The problems of currency exchange digital currency trading platform
can not hinder the development of blockchain, such as simple payment verification, side chain, lightning network protocol and other technologies proposed and in-depth research, which has been the problem solved by blockchain