Blockchain destruction address query

1. There are two methods: buy back and lock up or buy back and destroy. The former aims to sacrifice liquidity for a short-term good gimmick + theoretical deflation. The method is to buy back through the secondary market. Of course, there is also the practice of transferring money directly from the primary market to the lock address. In this case, we should pay attention to monitoring the capital flow of the lock address, which generally occurs in the public chain projects. Comparatively speaking, repo lock is better than repo destroy to reflect the sincerity of the project party, because the repo part will be directly put into the "black hole address" which can be checked, so as to cash in the positive, and attract new investors through the actual deflation and positive pull. Moreover, unlike the buyback lock, which can recover assets, the long-term benefits of buyback destruction are considerable
mainly speaking, it depends on the project party's idea. Gongxinbao and Xingyun chain both adopt the buyback lock mode, while trip of platform currency and blockchain tourism projects on several major platforms uses the buyback destruction mode. The former two brothers were very popular at that time, but they are not making any noise now, and the latter are still developing well. I don't know which mode eke belongs to

2. The issue of bitcoin is determined by the block height, that is, the distance from the No. 0 block of Genesis. Now when the number is reached, the total amount of bitcoin should be limited. After this village, there will be no store. If the miners dig a block but don't receive the reward of the block, the bitcoin will be destroyed forever

coinbase transaction is a special transaction that generates bitcoin "out of thin air". Only miners can write this kind of transaction, and the number of generated bitcoin is limited by rules (new currency reced by half for every 210000 blocks + transaction fee for this block)

however, the rules do not stipulate that the miner must take away all the rewards that can be taken, and can choose not to take them

therefore, a mine pool connected with the RSK side chain has made a bug before, forgetting to take away the reward and occupying a pit in a block for nothing, which is equivalent to destroying the corresponding amount of bitcoin, making the total amount of bitcoin decrease a little bit permanently

in addition, to spend a bitcoin, you only need to specify the transaction ID and output serial number

as like as two peas in multiple blocks repeatedly write identical coinbase transactions, the transaction ID is also repeated.

therefore, this kind of situation also occupies the pit of a block in vain, and permanently destroys the corresponding amount of bitcoin

it seems to me that this is still a security vulnerability, so the new version of bitcoin software later banned the writing of repeated coinbase transactions. But until now, there has been no ban on miners not getting their e rewards

generally speaking, a coin is controlled by a private key. If a coin is transferred to an address where no one knows the private key, it will be destroyed

if the owner does a good job in security, and the private key is not disclosed and cannot be guessed, but he accidentally loses the private key, it is equivalent to destroying all the coins he owns

there are only some special circumstances that require intentional destruction of coins

one is irreversibly converted into another kind of currency, such as the contract currency XCP attached to bitcoin and wormhole cash WHC attached to BCH

the second is to save certificates and data on the chain, such as the time stamp: panbiao.com/2013/08 /

and the crowd funding of the original Ethereum founding team: zhuanlan.hu.com/p/29

the private key is essentially a big number. Whoever knows this number can control the currency on the corresponding address. So the private key must be generated with reliable random number, otherwise it may be guessed and stolen

compared with the token, the address is the hash of the public key. There is no way to judge whether an address has a corresponding public key and private key (even if the public key is known, the corresponding private key cannot be known). Therefore, even if it is explicitly the address of "burned" token, the system does not prohibit the transfer in

strictly speaking, what locks the currency is a small program (script). This program takes the input as the public key and digital signature. First, check whether the public key hash is consistent, and then check whether the digital signature is valid. If it is valid, it will be verified and transfer is allowed; Otherwise, it will be judged that the transaction is illegal and refuse to package into the chain

it is the whole node software that explains and executes this program. It can be said that the software code of the whole node specifically defines a coin

however, the current situation is very embarrassing. Most miners do not run the whole node, only a few mines are running. The vast majority of users do not run the whole node, even if they run the whole node, they can only perform verification, no computing power, no block

3. Blockchain? Do you mean blockchain technology or blockchain information, or things related to the blockchain instry
1) if it's just "blockchain", the direct network can find a good interpretation of "blockchain network"
2) if it is "blockchain technology", the network also has a good interpretation, and all walks of life are also trying to combine with blockchain technology in new fields. Maybe in the future, blockchain technology will be used correctly instead of being used to deceive people
3) if it is "blockchain information", you can go to all kinds of blockchain media or financial media, and almost every day there are relevant blockchain instry information and news reports. Such as: Babbitt, coin you finance, blocknet, golden, daily, etc
4) if it's "blockchain audio", you can go to Himalaya FM, litchi micro class, qianchat and other platforms. For example, the audio related to "voice of money", "Yu Lingxiong", "Wang Feng" and some other financial media blockchain is also good, with various dry goods and in-depth analysis
therefore, the above four points are all related to blockchain. It depends on your choice.

4. Indeed, there are blockchain wallets using this technology, such as IDC
wallet. In fact, mnemonics are another form of expression of the private key, which has the same function as the private key, mainly to protect your blockchain money

5. It's a kind of coding, which usually makes the space% sign. No law. The system does it automatically.

6.

The address itself is anonymous. Ordinary people can't find it. But if you register with the exchange, the exchange has your information and blockchain address

anonymity and traceability of blockchain addresses : anyone can easily generate a large number of private keys, public keys and addresses. The address itself is anonymous, which can be further improved by multiple address transactions. But all transactions are transparent, that is to say, all transactions at one address can be checked and traced. That is to say, I can track and query all the in and out accounts and balances at the address you give

please refer to the webpage link for details

7. If the blockchain IP domain name is only one year old, it must be fake. It's true that the IP domain name will be replaced within a few years