A10 computing power
for more details, please refer to the Internet: http://ke..com/view/136896.html?wtp=tt
it may take two years to dig a bitcoin.
The differences between Apple's A10 chip and A9 chip are as follows:
1. The running score data shows that the single core running score of Apple's A10 processor has reached 3000, which is comparable to that of Apple's a9x processor, and has increased by about 20% compared with that of Apple's A9 processor
2. In terms of GPU graphics processing, apple A10 chip is two-thirds higher than apple A9
3. Apple A10 chip adopts 6-core design and 14 nm proction process, while Apple A9 chip still adopts al core design
In terms of battery life, because Apple A10 chip adopts 6-core design, its power consumption is much larger than that of Apple A9, which is the problem apple must consider to solve Apple A9 processor model is apl1022, which is packaged with Hynix 2GB lpddr4 ram. Apl1022 is manufactured by TSMC with 16nm FinFET process. The packaging area of 16nm A9 processor is larger than that of 14nm A9 processor6. The number of Apple's A10 processor core is tmgk98, which continues the A9 tmgk96. The core area is about 125 square mm. The package uses TSMC's latest FIFO technology and is more compact than before. It is said that there are 3.3 billion transistors
{rrrrrrr}
extended materials:
at the launch of iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 plus, apple officially released the new chip A10 fusion, a 64 bit processor with a performance of "little rocket". A10 fusion is the first apple four core processor with 3.3 billion transistors. The CPU is 40% faster than the A9 processor of the iPhone 6S, twice as fast as the A8, and 120 times faster than the iPhone generation
the GPU of Apple's A10 chip has also been updated, which is 50% faster than that of A9, three times faster than that of A8 chip, and 240 times faster than that of iPhone generation. Apple's A10 fusion processor can bring "console level Games", and Lightroom will support raw image editing and so on
Snapdragon 855 and A12
many people are optimistic about snapdragon 855, and many people are also interested in whether this new high pass chip can become Apple's flagship standard chip this year -- A12 bionic chip's real rival. Although the detailed running points will not be known until the proct comes into the market, some hardware websites and media have commented in advance that snapdragon 855 lags behind Apple's A12 bionics, and the former is even one year behind the latter<
1. CPU
snapdragon 855 has four performance cores and four energy efficiency cores, one of which is designated as the main core, and can provide performance and energy efficiency independently. In comparison, apple A12 uses two high-performance cores and four energy-efficient cores
four performance cores vs. two performance cores, it seems that snapdragon 855 has more advantages. However, in most use cases, mobile software usually only needs to use a single core, and the operating system will drive background tasks in one second, which is why the single core score can more truly measure the actual performance of mobile devices
this fact also prompted apple to focus on fewer major kernel designs: A9 has only two cores, and A10 has introced two performance cores and two energy efficiency cores. Since a11, Apple has basically stabilized the architecture of pairing two performance cores with four energy efficiency cores. According to the benchmark data of specint 2006, the average performance of Apple A12 is 24% better than that of a11, the performance improvement can reach up to 40%, the unit energy efficiency ratio (i.e. the comparison of computing and power consumption) is increased by 12%, and the single thread performance is even better than the reced frequency Intel skylake processor
snapdragon 855 does the same thing. By focusing on a very high-performance core, the whole chip achieves more lasting performance and higher efficiency. The comparison chart of application startup time between snapdragon 855 and its competitors released by Qualcomm on the spot:
snapdragon 855 is destined to provide services for a few high-end smartphones, but the sales volume of these procts is far lower than that of iPhone, Even in the face of the common market phenomenon of "consumer mobile phone prices rise - consumer mobile phone retention period is extended - the resial source of new demand for smart phones is reced", which is a terrible news for Qualcomm. What's more, more mobile phone manufacturers have begun to follow the path of chip self-development like apple
Samsung has been building its own exynos chip for many years, and even started to integrate its own modem in some models. In China, where the smartphone market is still growing, various basic competitors of Qualcomm, such as MediaTek, are consuming the medium and low-end businesses of Qualcomm. This fall, Huawei launched its new flagship mobile phone with Kirin chips, the first 7Nm chips in the market ahead of Qualcomm and apple
that is to say, now the world's three largest smartphone manufacturers - accounting for nearly half of all mobile phone sales - have focused on their internal chips, and do not intend to pay for a new generation of high-end processors to Qualcomm. It's hard to predict how much power will drive the increase in the number of high-end chips in the smartphone market. Anyway, the situation is not optimistic. It can be said that before snapdragon 845, procts like snapdragon 821 had instry leading advantages, which is a fact. However, it is also true that from the beginning of Qualcomm snapdragon 845, Qualcomm began to lag behind apple and Huawei in mobile chips