Is extortion of land between brothers an evil force

1. There's a rule of family separation. Who's going to separate their families and rent them? Your elders are talking nonsense. Of course, if we break the rules of separation, we are prepared to bear the consequences. What the law should do is not for the masses to do whatever they want. That is to say, such a rent does not exist. For all the land under the household contract responsibility system, the village has an account, not to mention the certificate of formalism. It can also be concluded that this is not a land dispute. It is clear that some people deliberately make trouble and make trouble. Why should we avoid the heavy and take the light and deceive ourselves? The township government should not admit the land dispute. It is normal for the government not to compensate for land that is not under the household contract responsibility system. Why don't you mention that your family pays agricultural tax or public grain and receives agricultural subsidies? Agricultural subsidies are very important for the government to identify whose land it belongs to

2. When I was in the land contract, my rural household registration was transferred to the land. Later, I became a non-agricultural household registration in the town. The land was cultivated and managed by my brother's family. Now I can still get it back. If I can, what department should I go to?

3.

Hu qiugan, a rural lawyer in Biyang, answers:

1. private plots, private hills and private grasslands are owned by the collective, and their members only have the right to use them. They are not allowed to rent, transfer or trade them, and they are not allowed to use them for non-agricultural proction purposes such as building houses without authorization. The procts proced in private plots are at the disposal of the peasants themselves, and the state does not levy agricultural tax. Private livestock are also owned and controlled by herdsmen, and are not taxed or distributed within the tax exemption points stipulated by various localities. The right to operate private plots of land, mountains and grasslands shall be protected by the state and shall not be encroached upon at will. Before 1991 (the second land adjustment), the nature of private land was different from responsibility land. However, with the abolition of agricultural tax in recent years, the ownership of private land was the same as responsibility land
   

2. in view of your problems, the "ownership" of this triangle still belongs to the collective, while the "right to use" still belongs to your family, and your uncle's family has no right to interfere; The legal basis for you is: after one year of land exchange, even without the consent of the village group, it is usually considered that the village group has already known the recognition. After 20 years, the land is still owned by the user. In order to facilitate proction, the State encourages land transfer (land adjustment)

3. dispute resolution: you can't go to the court to file a lawsuit, because this is a land use right dispute, so you must go through the "right confirmation". According to the land law, the land disputes between the two parties can be confirmed by the township government (not the court) or the county government. That is to say, you can directly go to the Township Land Office (acting on behalf of the government) or county land bureau to apply for settlement without paying legal fees

4. The original land was shared and the two families were separated. You can go to the village committee.

5. The facts you discuss must be proved by evidence, such as human evidence or material evidence, otherwise it is difficult for the law to protect your rights and interests.

6. The land dispute between brothers shows that the interests of land ownership are greater than the brotherhood.

7. Q: what's the reason for the old man to take all the compensation& lt; br> & lt; br> What's the reason for your second uncle to occupy your land to grow fruit trees& lt; br> & lt; br> Do you have any evidence to prove that your family owns the right to use the land expropriated and the land planted with fruit trees& lt; br> & lt; br> Assuming that the facts you have stated are objective and true, there should be two legal relationships in this case: your grandfather's encroachment on your father's share of the compensation; Your second uncle's infringement on the usufruct of your land& lt; br> & lt; br> In principle, the court should file such cases according to law& lt; br> However, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the lawsuit - paying back money and vacating land, you need to collect enough evidence. It is suggested that you consult the local lawyer, and it is best to hire a lawyer to represent you in the lawsuit& lt; br> & lt; br> If you can't afford the costs, try going to your local land administration; All & gt; Or the rural collective land management department within the government), or the judicial bureau to seek help, or through letters and visits and other ways to coordinate& lt; br> & lt; br> For now, that's all you can do.

8.

Yes, there is nothing wrong with that. When I was a child, I could do anything, because there were no separate families at that time, but when I grew up, a family became several families. At this time, it was divided between the inside and the outside, and the money was not in the charge of my parents, so my brothers had to settle the accounts

however, when the problem becomes intractable, they will still think of the purpose of clearing up the account. At this time, everything may not be clear, and there is no proof. At this time, it is easy to lead to such a situation. Therefore, in order to maintain the friendship between brothers for a long time, the accounts should be settled in time. After all, no one can bear the responsibility of several people without selfishness