Can I take my children with me to the confinement center

virtual currency money? This has been debated for many years, and several books have been published. I have also made a special analysis in postmodern economy. In my opinion, it is no longer necessary to dwell on technical details, but need a macro view
ring the 12th Five Year Plan period, China's general situation is to upgrade from manufacturing instry to service instry. The service instry will no longer be a bare handed service instry, but need to be multiplied and amplified by using intermediary as leverage. Virtual currency is the multiplier and amplifier of information service instry. To support it or to limit it, it is better to consider in the development of modern service instry, rather than in the financial sector
money has existed since ancient times. It is said that it is an institutional innovation from the manufacturing instry to the intermediate leverage stage, especially after the instrialization develops from the instrial capital stage to the financial capital stage, the monetary policy begins to play a leverage role in the macro-control. In the history of instrialization, financial capital and monetary policy have become multipliers and amplifiers of instrial development. Europeans have contributed to mankind in this respect, and their leading position in economy also benefits from this kind of institutional innovation
from this unique perspective, today's virtual currency has special significance. From the perspective of practical development, many virtual currencies, including q-coin, are intermediaries created for the development of information services in their fields when payment conditions and credit conditions are not available. With the development, it graally shows that they have the leverage to multiply and enlarge information value-added services
it can be seen that the historical background of currency and virtual currency is different. The transformation from instrial society to information society is manifested in the power transfer from monetary lever to information lever. From the very beginning, virtual currency did not serve manufacturing and instrialization. It should belong to the service instry and informatization. This is the historical reason why it should not be regarded as currency and should not be directly managed by monetary policy
e to the differences in terms of payment and credit between China and the United States, virtual currency can be proced in China. In hindsight, it is a good thing. If we take credit card and other financial instruments as the intermediary of information services, as in the United States, sooner or later there will be a re informatization process of transforming credit card into a "financial information" hybrid intermediary (such as the future form of online payment and mobile payment). The United States is now going to make up this lesson in online payment. The system innovation of virtual currency in China is of great significance. Just as the first maturity of financial capital and monetary leverage in Europe is a blessing for Europe, the proper development of virtual currency will also be a blessing for China. It just can provide the multiplication and amplification mechanism for the future service instry's upgrading (from the bare handed service instry to the service instry based on the information platform), which is concive to the deep integration of instrialization and informatization.