47 times the computing power of ant 815g

1. Ant z9nini official website to the news is only for sale overseas version, from the pre-sale to now a few days, I have received a lot of customer orders! Because there is no prototype now, we can only analyze its cost performance from data and parameters! The official calculation power of ant z9mini is tentatively 10K / s, but the official announcement is that the calculation power of ant z9mini will be higher when it is really on the market. If the current 10K / s calculation power is used to dig the zero coin of Zec, the advantage is very obvious! At present, the 8K graphics card miner on the market has a unit price of 15800. The computing power of the price is only 2K, and the power consumption is about 1100 watts. The official power consumption of ant z9mini is 300 watts

2. S9i is 14th / s. according to the current unit difficulty, it can dig out 0.01057560btc per month. At the current cost of electricity and mining machinery, it takes about 130 days to recover the cost. The most important choice is low electricity price

3. Interstellar ant can be regarded as the leading cloud computing platform in the instry. Its packaging period is very short, and the money proction benefit is faster than other platforms. In addition, the cost of selling mining machines is low, and the platform only charges technical management fees, so the mining cost can be greatly reced.

4. About 100-400 times, there is no definite conclusion, but there is a point that ants are not Hercules! Ants are not Hercules: for example, I have realized the essence of this problem for a long time. However, after searching with various engines, I found no articles that I know as well as I do. I am surprised that I am responsible for popularizing this topic
the reason why people, including some scientists, think ants are Hercules is mainly based on the proportional relationship between the weight of weightlifters and the weight they lift, that is, people can lift at most three times their weight, while ants can lift 100 times their weight, so ants are Hercules! At first glance, this comparison is quite reasonable, but I don't know that it is a metaphysical mistake
we know that air, like water, has a certain buoyancy. Of course, the buoyancy of air is much smaller than that of water, which can be ignored in the weight of human beings. However, these negligible buoyancy forces are crucial to the weight of ants and other insects. It is precisely because of the buoyancy of the air that these small animals can easily lift or drag objects several times their own weight. Just like people can easily lift sandbags in the water, which are difficult to lift on the shore, the buoyancy of water also plays a crucial role at this time. Moreover, just like the buoyancy of water, the smaller the specific gravity of the object, the greater the buoyancy force on it, which explains why the leaf cutting ant can easily lift and carry a large leaf several times its size. I can infer that it would be much more difficult for ants to move an embroidery needle of the same weight as a leaf
seeing the above, some friends will surely say that inference must be inference. This phenomenon seems to make sense in theory. Can we do an experiment to verify it? It doesn't matter that ants can easily lift dozens of times their weight, which is an indisputable fact. I want to prove it from another point of view. I want to do a weight + acceleration injury experiment on animals with relative weight: I want to stand up a toothpick, raise my hand and let it fall on an ant. As a result, the ants were not injured, let alone killed. According to the previous argument that people and ants bear the same proportion of weight, we can imagine that if a person is hit by a fallen tree, it is at least seriously injured. Here, ants are not injured by toothpicks tens of times their weight, because the buoyancy or resistance of the air will have an effective reaction on the toothpicks. For a fallen tree, the buoyancy or resistance of the air can be ignored. Therefore, it can be concluded that: ants can lift dozens of times their weight because the buoyancy of the air has an effective reaction force on relatively light objects; People can't lift objects several times their weight because the buoyancy of air has no effective reaction force on relatively heavy objects< In conclusion, ants are not Hercules!

5.

Ants can generally lift objects 5000 times heavier than themselves

the bones on the limbs of ants grow outside the muscles, and their muscle fibers contain special enzymes and hormone proteins, which can release huge energy with little activity and almost no loss, which can not be compared with other animals

ant is a kind of insect with social habits, and is close to wasp. Ants are known to have appeared as early as the Cretaceous, probably evolved from primitive wasps in the Jurassic. The main difference is that the antennae of ants are obviously geniculate, and the abdomen of wasps is a whole

The characteristics of ants are as follows:

1. There are obvious polytypic phenomena, including three different types of female, male and worker ants, including soldier ants transformed from worker ants. The alts are small, mostly reddish brown or black. Generally, females and males have wings, while workers and soldiers have no wings. Most species dig soil to build nests, and also inhabit branches and other holes

The lower species were carnivorous or polyphagous, and the higher species were phytophagous

Some species can store seeds, cultivate true bacteria or collect honeydew from aphids and scale insects as food; In the indoor often take cannibal food

source of reference materials: Network - ants

source of reference materials: People's Network - little and big people human beings are learning from ants

6. There are two arguments about the strength of ants. Ants are Hercules. According to the measurement of mechanics, an ant can lift 400 times its weight and haul 1700 times its weight. Mark Moffett, an entomologist at Harvard University, is a scholar who has a lot of research on Asian ants. According to his observation, more than 10 United ants can carry maggots or other food more than 5000 times of their own weight, which is equivalent to the weight of 3500 tons carried by 10 strong men with an average weight of 70 kg, that is, 350 tons per person. From the angle of relative strength, ants are worthy of the strongmen. Why can a little ant have such power? Scientists have done a lot of research and analysis, and proved that the body of ants is a treasure house of micro animal nutrition. Every 100 grams of ants can proce 2929 kJ (700 kcal) of heat. Scientists have found that the leg muscles of ants are an efficient "engine", which is composed of billions of subtle "small engines". So, ants can proce such extraordinary power. The "muscle engine" of ants uses a special "fuel", which is a very complex phosphorus compound called ATP. In many cases, as long as the muscle proces a little acid ring the activity (this feeling is what we usually call "arm acid"), it can cause the drastic change of "fuel". This change can make the long molecules of muscle protein contract in an instant and proce great power. This kind of special "fuel" can release the latent energy directly without combustion and transform it into mechanical energy. In addition, there is no mechanical friction, so there is almost no energy loss. Because of this, the efficiency of ant's "muscle engine" is very high, up to 80%. This is the secret of "ant Hercules". Ants are not Hercules. Ants are not Hercules: for example, I have realized the essence of this problem for a long time. However, after searching with various engines, I found no articles that I know as well as I do. I am surprised that I am responsible for popularizing this topic. People, including some scientists, think that ants are Hercules mainly based on the proportion between the weight of weightlifters and the weight they lift. They say: people can lift at most three times their weight, while ants can lift 100 times their weight. So ants are Hercules! At first glance, this comparison is quite reasonable, but I don't know that it is a metaphysical mistake. We know that air, like water, has a certain buoyancy. Of course, the buoyancy of air is much smaller than that of water, which can be ignored in the weight of human beings. However, these negligible buoyancy forces are crucial to the weight of ants and other insects. It is precisely because of the buoyancy of the air that these small animals can easily lift or drag objects several times their own weight. Just like people can easily lift sandbags in the water, which are difficult to lift on the shore, the buoyancy of water also plays a crucial role at this time. Moreover, just like the buoyancy of water, the smaller the specific gravity of the object, the greater the buoyancy force on it, which explains why the leaf cutting ant can easily lift and carry a large leaf several times its size. I can infer that it would be much more difficult for ants to move an embroidery needle of the same weight as a leaf. Seeing the above, some friends will surely say that inference must be inference. This phenomenon seems to make sense in theory. Can we do an experiment to verify it? It doesn't matter that ants can easily lift dozens of times their weight, which is an indisputable fact. I want to prove it from another point of view. I want to do a weight + acceleration injury experiment on animals with relative weight: I want to stand up a toothpick, raise my hand and let it fall on an ant. As a result, the ants were not injured, let alone killed. According to the previous argument that people and ants bear the same proportion of weight, we can imagine that if a person is hit by a fallen tree, it is at least seriously injured. Here, ants are not injured by toothpicks tens of times their weight, because the buoyancy or resistance of the air will have an effective reaction on the toothpicks. For a fallen tree, the buoyancy or resistance of the air can be ignored. Therefore, it can be concluded that: ants can lift dozens of times their weight because the buoyancy of the air has an effective reaction force on relatively light objects; People can't lift objects several times their weight because the buoyancy of air has no effective reaction force on relatively heavy objects; To sum up, the conclusion is: ants are not Hercules!

7. There is a problem of relative proportion. No matter how strong an ant is, it can't lift an apple of 0.25 kg. The weight of the apple you pick up is only 1 / 400 of our weight. Convert that to the ant world. Maybe it's just a hair on the ant that has this weight. Ants can drag objects that weigh more than 50 times their own weight. If we just look at them in absolute proportion, it is equivalent to a person weighing 100 kg carrying 5 tons of things. However, in fact, we do not consider the characteristics of gravity according to the objective proportion. We only estimate the area rather than the volume, such as doubling the size of a cube, It is easy to understand that its actual volume should be increased by seven eighths instead of one half as we think, because the object is three-dimensional, and the increase in volume must be greater than the area of one side of it. For example, a cube with a side length of 2 cm has a volume of 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 cubic cm; If the side length is 4 cm, the volume is 4 x 4 x 4 = 32 cubic cm; The volume should be 8 times larger. According to this ratio, if the size of an ant is scaled up to be as large as that of a human, the increase in the size of the ant's legs is certainly not as large as the absolute weight of the body. (this is easy to understand, because the absolute value of the body is already larger than that of the legs.) Its legs are not enough to support its body. I'm afraid they don't even have the strength to stand up, let alone the most powerful animal in the world. According to the principle of gravity, the greater the weight, the greater the gravity it receives. This is why a small insect like a flea can jump hundreds of times higher than itself. It shows that the larger the indivial is, the greater the force of gravity it needs to overcome. The mass (or volume and weight) of a small ant is very small, and its gravity is also very small. If its volume is doubled, even if it is not a cube, its volume must be increased many times, and the pressure on its body must also be increased many times. The ant's thin leg is a special structure for small insects to deal with the condition of very small gravity, If the volume of the body is multiplied or increased by tens of millions of times, the pressure of the body is bound to increase by tens of millions of times. From the mechanical principle, it can not cope with it. This is why elephants, rhinoceros and hippos have thick legs. So, the reason why ants can lift several times their own weight is because they are very small. If we scale down to the size of ants, we will also be great Hercules.

8. If we don't consider the bearing capacity of organs or anything, and just calculate, the ants that could have lifted themselves 400 times (each kind of ant is different) can't even lift themselves four times. If we consider organs ～～

9. Scientists have found that the leg muscle of ants is an efficient "engine", which is composed of billions of subtle "small engines". Therefore, ants can proce such extraordinary power. The "muscle engine" of ants uses a special "fuel", which is a very complex phosphorus compound, called adenosine triphosphate, That is ATP. This special "fuel" can directly release the latent energy into mechanical energy without burning. In addition, there is no mechanical friction, so there is almost no loss of energy. Because of this, the efficiency of ant's "muscle engine" is very high, up to 80%, which is the mystery of "ant Hercules"