How to determine whether or not to be decentralized
compared with the early Internet (WEB 1.0) era, Web 2.0 content is no longer proced by professional websites or specific groups, but the result of participation and creation by all Internet users with equal rights. Anyone can express their views on the Internet or create original content to proce information together
with the diversification of network service forms, the decentralized network model becomes more and more clear and possible. After the rise of Web 2.0, the services provided by Wikipedia, Flickr, blogger and other network service providers are decentralized. Any participant can submit content, and Internet users can co create or contribute content
with the emergence of more simple and easy-to-use decentralized network services, the characteristics of Web2.0 become more and more obvious. For example, the birth of services more suitable for ordinary Internet users, such as twitter and Facebook, makes it easier and more diversified to proce or contribute content to the Internet, thus enhancing the enthusiasm of Internet users to participate in the contribution and recing the threshold of procing content. Eventually, every netizen becomes a tiny and independent information provider, making the Internet more flat and content proction more diversified.
with the deepening of the interaction between subject and object, the continuous balance of cognitive function and the continuous improvement of cognitive structure, the indivial can be released from the egocentric state, which is called decentralization.
at present, the best e-commerce in China is "centralized" mode. The so-called centralized mode means that an e-commerce platform concentrates all businesses and eyeballs / traffic and becomes the first entrance for consumers to shop. Consumers find goods through this entrance, and the platform allocates benefits through this entrance<
the concept of decentralization has been boiling in the past two years, and the climax appeared in December last year. Zhang Xiaolong elaborated the eight views of wechat public platform in detail, one of which is that "wechat wants to build a real decentralized system, it will not provide a centralized traffic entrance to all public platform parties and third parties".
Decentralization is a phenomenon or structure, which can only appear or exist in a system with many nodes or in a group with many indivials
decentralizing is not to do without the center, but to let nodes freely choose and decide the center. In short, centralization means that the center determines the node. The node must depend on the center, and the node cannot survive without the center. Decentralization means that the node determines the center, the center must depend on the node, and the center cannot exist without the node. In a decentralized system, anyone is a node, and anyone can be a center. Any center is not permanent, but phased, and no center is mandatory for nodes
1 RMB ≈ US $0.1535
US $40599 = RMB 264543.084
the data is for reference only, and the transaction price at the bank counter shall prevail. Update time: 2021-03-24 08:47
1. Efficiency is different: the efficiency of decentralized network is higher than that of centralized network, but conversely, the security of centralized network is higher. On the whole, centralized network is suitable for high security applications
2. Different characteristics: centralized network means that each time two client computers communicate with each other through the server. The decentralized network is the initial need to go through the server, later communication does not need the server
3. Different costs: the characteristics of collective maintenance of blockchain can rece a lot of costs. The centralized network involves the maintenance, confidentiality, operation and so on of many systems, which must require a lot of human, financial and material resources. These things do not exist for the decentralization of blockchain, so they can save a lot of costs
extended materials:
precautions:
in the aspect of blockchain governance, an interesting trend recently is the re emergence of online virtual currency holder voting as a multi-purpose decision-making mechanism. Sometimes the vote of the coin holder is used to decide who runs the super node of the network (e.g. dpos in EOS, Neo, lisk and other systems), sometimes the protocol parameters are voted (e.g. the upper limit of Ethereum fuel supply), and sometimes the vote and direct application of approval (e.g. tezos) protocol upgrade are also concted
in all these cases, voting is automatic, and the protocol itself contains all the logic needed to change the verifier set or update its own rules, and automatically responds to the voting results