Can decentralization eliminate poverty
compared with the early Internet (WEB 1.0) era, Web 2.0 content is no longer proced by professional websites or specific groups, but the result of participation and creation by all Internet users with equal rights. Anyone can express their views on the Internet or create original content to proce information together
with the diversification of network service forms, the decentralized network model becomes more and more clear and possible. After the rise of Web 2.0, the services provided by Wikipedia, Flickr, blogger and other network service providers are decentralized. Any participant can submit content, and Internet users can co create or contribute content
with the emergence of more simple and easy-to-use decentralized network services, the characteristics of Web2.0 become more and more obvious. For example, the birth of services more suitable for ordinary Internet users, such as twitter and Facebook, makes it easier and more diversified to proce or contribute content to the Internet, thus enhancing the enthusiasm of Internet users to participate in the contribution and recing the threshold of procing content. Eventually, every netizen becomes a tiny and independent information provider, making the Internet more flat and content proction more diversified.
"decentralization" is translated from the English word decentralization, which is composed of the prefix de -, stem central and suffix ization. Among them, the stem central means "center", the suffix - ization means "... Hua", and the prefix de - has the meanings of leaving, removing, canceling and opposite. Therefore, it is very accurate to translate it into decentralization
what is the meaning of decentralization
vitalik buterin, founder of Ethereum, published the article "the meaning of decentralization" in February 2017, elaborating the meaning of decentralization. He thinks that we should distinguish the centralization and decentralization of computer software from three perspectives: architecture, governance and logic
Architecture centralization refers to the number of nodes that the system can tolerate and continue to run; Governance centralization refers to how many indivials and organizations are needed to control the system; Logic centralization refers to whether the interface and data presented by the system are like a single whole
blockchain is a unified account book of the whole network, so it is logically centralized, which is beyond doubt. From the perspective of architecture, blockchain is based on peer-to-peer network, so it is decentralized. From the perspective of governance, blockchain makes it difficult for a few people to control the whole system through consensus algorithm, so it is decentralized. The decentralization of architecture and governance brings three benefits to blockchain: fault tolerance, anti attack and anti collusion
five differences between blockchain and traditional distributed system
as a new kind of distributed system, blockchain is often mistakenly regarded as a distributed database or log system. In fact, there is a fundamental difference between blockchain and traditional distributed system, namely decentralization. Now let's look at the main differences between blockchain and traditional distributed systems:
(1) consistency algorithm: what blockchain needs to solve is the Byzantine general problem, that is, there are one or more fraulent nodes in the network, which may deliberately violate the protocol or transmit wrong data, Therefore, Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus algorithms, such as BFT, pow, POS, are often used in blockchain; The traditional distributed system only needs to consider the node failure and communication errors, and often uses consistency algorithms such as Paxos and raft, which can not resist the fraulent nodes
(2) central controller: there is no central controller in the blockchain network, and no node can control or coordinate the generation of ledger data. All nodes coordinate through consensus algorithm to generate consistent ledger. However, the traditional publishing system is often controlled by one organization, which uniformly dispatches all nodes to participate in the calculation
(3) rule making: the rule of blockchain is consensus protocol, also known as consensus mechanism, and consensus algorithm is a part of it. Consensus mechanism is generally designed and developed by a person or a team, and the corresponding proceres are developed for the community to use. This seems to be the same as the traditional distributed system, but the change and upgrading of the consensus mechanism of the blockchain requires the community to have a consensus on it. If no consensus can be reached, anyone can implement hard bifurcation and build another community and chain. This is the decentralization process of consensus mechanism.
De flow means that all social resources can be aggregated and distributed with one click
in a system with many nodes, each node has a high degree of autonomy. Nodes can connect with each other freely to form a new connection unit. Any node may become the stage center, but it does not have the mandatory central control function. The influence between nodes will form a nonlinear causal relationship through the network
This kind of open, flat and equal system phenomenon or structure is called decentralization
extended materials:
compared with the previous Internet (WEB 1.0) era, today's Internet (Web 2.0) content is no longer proced by professional websites or specific groups, but by the participation of the whole Internet users and the creation of equal power levels. Anyone can express their views on the Internet or create original content to proce information together
with the diversification of network service shape, the decentralized network model becomes more and more clear and possible. After the rise of Web2.0, the services provided by Wikipedia, Flickr, blogger and other network service providers are decentralized. Any participant can submit content, and Internet users can create or contribute content together
decentralization in decentralized money contains multiple meanings: decentralization of money issuance, decentralization of money circulation, decentralization of money withdrawal...
as far as our current economic system is concerned, the issuance of money is carried out by the central bank or other similar institutions and endorsed by the national credit. Therefore, the issue of money is obviously a kind of centralized, controlled by the government or institutions. However, in the current economic system, the circulation of money is decentralized
although in our current financial system, the vast majority of money has been circulating through banks, this mode of circulation is mostly controlled by the money owners themselves, that is to say, the circulation of money is not controlled by central institutions. In addition to some specific financial requirements, some circulation has been regulated; Or the judicial organs may intervene and forcibly manage the circulation of money. In proportion, these centralized operations are very few. Therefore, we can say that in the existing economic system, the circulation of money is decentralized< In fact, the central bank and other financial management institutions make use of the power of currency issuance to regulate the whole market and maintain the stability of economic development and currency
we have learned in economics that the total amount of money circulation should match the current trade situation. In other words, the total amount of money circulation is closely related to the economic situation. The circulation of money needs to be regulated to influence the market; And the market also forces the regulatory agencies to regulate the currency through various feedback, so as to maintain the stability of the currency.
are there multiple client applications? There are two schools of thought. One assumption is that a single normative client application can concentrate limited resources on one project, and a development team can communicate more easily, which will maximize the success rate and competitiveness compared with other platforms. In addition, a single client application can prevent consensus failure caused by local account book inconsistency of different nodes (at least as long as each node upgrades its software after hard forking). On the other hand, the existence of multiple clients will make the network more likely to survive attacks (one client may stop block proction completely) or consensus failure (one or more clients cannot run the protocol correctly, which may lead to wrong block or stop block proction completely). In fact, both happened in Ethereum. But there are more subtle reasons. Firstly, the parallel application of multiple clients reces the dominant influence of a single core development team on the network, which is one of the biggest problems of bitcoin governance (zcash foundation will also decide to build a second zcash client to balance the power of electric coin). Moreover, different clients may make different architecture decisions and have different advantages (for example, mining, data search), and using different languages to write clients can enable more developers to participate in core development. Although parallel applications and beta applications are very good, the mainstream is the main network client: for example, bitcoin has at least 15 client applications, but 97% of the nodes run a program, that is, bitcoin core
how many organizations control mining computing power? The more parties involved in mining, the more difficult it is to collude with each other to engage in selfish mining, or to engage in double flower attacks (commonly known as 51% attacks, but the actual mathematical principles are more complex). This is not a hypothetical risk, as it has occurred in networks such as Ethereum classic and bitcoin gold. In addition, more miners means a fairer distribution of mining rewards. Although many indivial miners may participate in mining, because of incentives, they will gather in a few mines, and even a seemingly decentralized network may rely on a few entities for Mining: the three largest Ethereum mines jointly control 60% of the total power, while bitcoin's top four mines account for about 56%.
On March 24, 2018, at the China Development Forum sponsored by the development research center of the State Council, Eric Maskin, Professor of Harvard University and winner of the Nobel Prize in economics in 2017, proposed that government intervention is necessary to truly solve the problem of poverty, Only by empowering unskilled workers and giving them skills and tools to enter the global labor market can we really solve the problem of poverty
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, poverty alleviation, as the bottom line goal and landmark indicator of building a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way, has been included in the overall layout of "five in one" and the strategic layout of "four comprehensives". It has established the goal of poverty alleviation of the poor population, removal of the hat of all poverty-stricken counties and elimination of regional overall poverty under the current standard by 2020 According to Zheng Zhijie, President of China Development Bank, a total of 68.53 million people have been reced from 2012 to 2017. At the same time, in the "new agenda for the world economy" of the China development high level forum, Vice Minister of Finance Zhu Guangyao also mentioned that China's poverty rection population has contributed 76% of the world's poverty rection According to Ye Xingqing, director of the Rural Economic Research Department of the development research center of the State Council, from a larger time dimension, in the past 40 years of reform and opening up, the number of rural poor people in China has decreased from 770 million in 1978 to 30.46 million, and the incidence of poverty has decreased from 97.5% to 3.1%"it can be called a miracle in the history of poverty rection in human history, and it has become the first country in the world to achieve the UN Millennium Development Goals, making a great contribution to the cause of poverty rection in the world," said Zheng Zhijie, It has a huge effect. "
Ye Xingqing, director of the Rural Economic Research Department of the development research center of the State Council, explained that China's poverty alleviation can be observed from three dimensions: first, the sustained rapid economic growth for many years has benefited most people from the middle, but the absolute effect of economic growth will weaken with the improvement of the development level, so it is necessary to improve the economic inclusiveness
"but in the past 40 years, there are still some groups that are difficult to benefit from it. Since 1983, the Chinese government has had a special poverty alleviation plan. In 1986, a special agency was set up. Since 1994, three national poverty alleviation plans have been launched. Especially after 2015, China has put forward a strategy of targeted poverty alleviation. It should be said that such a special poverty alleviation plan can not be covered by the absolute effect and the population that cannot be covered by inclusiveness has played a great role. " Ye Xingqing said
But ye Xingqing asked, "the goal of eliminating absolute poverty by 2020 can be basically achieved. The main problem is to improve the quality, but we are more concerned about what to do after three years." According to him, in recent three years, China's rural income distribution structure has not improved, but has widened. In the past decade, the relative income level of 20% of the lowest income in rural areas has declined, and the income gap between urban and rural areas has also widened"after 2020, our poverty alleviation will shift from the current targeted poverty alleviation to alleviating the relative poverty in rural areas, and pay more attention to the employment and income of 20% of the poor people." Ye Xingqing said
Eric Maskin, Professor of Harvard University and winner of the Nobel Prize in economics in 2017, also provides an explanation for this issue
According to Eric Maskin, the supporters of globalization believe that globalization can solve the problem of poverty. There are many poor people in developing countries. International trade can enable developing countries to focus on those procts with comparative advantages, and the income of low skilled workers can also be increased However, Eric Maskin believes that this is not the case. He said that the international division of proction means the globalization of the labor market itself, which also benefits workers in developing countries"the problem is that it also excludes unskilled workers, especially the rural labor force, from benefiting from globalization." Eric Maskin said
Therefore, Eric Maskin believes that the government must intervene to raise the wages of unskilled workers and help them out of poverty. Only by empowering them and giving them skills and tools to enter the global labor market, can we really solve the problem of poverty