Vega graphics computing power

1. At present, Vega 56 (double 11 2888) is the cheapest Vega on the market
e to special reasons (mining), Vega 56 has risen to 4300-5400 (still out of stock)
it is recommended to give up Vega graphics card at present

2. The new generation of Ryzen processors, awesome in terms of performance, power and temperature, has given great competition to old rival Intel, so as to reshape the Core I and Core X proct line this year.
the appearance of AMD's public version RX Vega graphics card is still very good, but it can't suppress the high heat Vega graphics card. Therefore, all non-public versions of Rx Vega need to strengthen heat dissipation and use more powerful radiators. Dylan demon RX Vega 64 graphics card is such a proct
e to the slightly higher frequency, the performance of Dylan demon RX Vega 64 is higher than that of Vega 64 air-cooled and water-cooled, but the leading range is not obvious. The GPU score in timespy is 7329, which is less than 1% and 2% higher than that of Vega 64 air-cooled and water-cooled respectively
the performance of AMD's RX Vega graphics card is not weak at all, at least it is the GTX 1080 level. Therefore, under 1080p and 4K resolution, the stronger Dylan demon RX Vega has little pressure. It's OK to take all the current mainstream 3d games, including the very popular chicken eating game, which has high requirements for game hardware, Dylan demon RX Vega graphics card can run smoothly even with the highest special effects, and the high or medium special effects are easier.

3. Today, there are three major graphics card brands in the notebook field, namely Intel, AMD and NVIDIA. Among them, Intel and AMD's mobile processors are internally integrated with core graphics cards, which belong to "buy one get one free"

Intel Xe architecture independent graphics card is planned to be launched in 2020. In the future, we will see the scene of these three brands being separated in the field of independent graphics card

the combination of multi-core processor and Quadro single display is usually the standard configuration of mobile workstation

and independent graphics card is not only more suitable for playing games, but also derived professional display for graphics workstation. If you are engaged in professional design work, you need to recognize this kind of proct

generally speaking, the performance of the independent graphics card is higher than that of the processor integrated core display, but with the 10th generation core ice lake (such as iris plus 48 or higher) and AMD sharp Dragon (such as radon Vega 6 or higher) continuously strengthening the specifications of the integrated core display, the performance of the top-level core display is no less than that of the entry-level independent graphics card (such as geforce mx110, radon 520, etc.). But if you like to play large 3D, you still need a higher performance independent graphics card to help<

performance comparison between kernel display and entry-level independent display

who is influencing kernel display performance

nowadays, there are three main factors affecting kernel display performance, one is computing unit, the other is running frequency, and the third is memory specification<

take the current popular amd mobile Raptor processors as an example, they are all integrated with Vega architecture GPU, and they are classified by different number of Cu units (each Cu unit integrates 64 stream processors). For example, the second generation Raptor 53500u integrates Vega 8, the suffix 8 represents 8 groups of Cu units, and the Raptor 73700u integrates Vega 10 represents 10 groups of Cu units

when the core architecture of GPU is the same, the more computing units, the stronger the performance

theoretically, but this problem is also affected by the running frequency and memory specification

taking AMD's third-generation sharp dragon 54600u as an example, its integrated Vega 6 has only six groups of Cu units, but its 3D performance is still significantly better than that of sharp dragon 53500u integrated Vega 8

why Vega 6 is better than Vega 8

the answer is very simple. The third-generation sharp dragon 54600u adopts the latest 7Nm process technology. On the basis of adding two physical cores, four logic cores and larger cache capacity, it also greatly increases the operating frequency of the integrated Vega 6 core display to 1500mhz. It can be seen that more advanced process technology is not only the gospel of processor, but also plays a vital role in the field of graphics card

at the same time, the latest sharp dragon processor also supports ddr4-3200mhz or lpddr4x-4266mhz memory. The core display is a virtual video memory using memory. The higher the memory frequency is, the higher the video memory frequency is. By contrast, the operating frequency of Vega 8 integrated with the second generation of 5 3500u is only 1200MHz, and its memory specification is only ddr4-2400mhz, which means that the core / video memory frequency of GPU is at a disadvantage, so that more computing units cannot make up for it

if you want to give full play to the performance of kernel display, you also need the memory to run in al channel mode. In addition, the number of EU units mainly affects the display of Intel processor integration. The latest 10th generation core has 64, 48, 32 and 24 EU units, and their performance decreases in turn.

4.

The vega8 is equivalent to the al display gt740 / r7250 graphics card

1, vega8 is the built-in core display of ryzen3's 2200g processor, performance is equivalent to the level of the al display gt740 / r7250, r52400g integrated vega11 is basically equivalent to the level of gt1030 / rx550

With al channel memory and no over frequency, the performance of GPU Vega 8 reaches 80% of that of gt1030

{rrrrrrr}

extended data:

vega8 graphics card specifications

1, CUDA processor core: 640

2, base frequency (MHz): 1020

3, lifting frequency (MHz): 1085

4, video memory frequency: 5.4 Gbps

5, standard video memory configuration: 2048 MB / 1024MB

6, video memory interface: gddr5

7 Memory bit width: 128 bit

8, memory bandwidth (GB / s): 86.4