How can I get to the second center of Guoyang fifth hall

1.

bus line: No.21, about 4.0km in the whole journey

1. Take No.21 from the second coal construction station, pass 7 stops, and reach Yongfeng Street Station

2. Walk about 1.1km to wuguanyi center

2. Ha ha, it's a coincidence that I'm a native of Woyang.
Woyang county belongs to Bo, Anhui Province; Mm & quot; It's a tiny bit Zhou City is the hometown of Laozi, a famous thinker. Its economy is developing rapidly, but it is still not very developed at present. It is mainly agriculture, and there are no big enterprises; BF family wine & quot; Guoyang No.2 Middle School is located in Shengli Road, I forgot the specific number, sorry.
my junior high school is in No.2 Middle School, ha ha, the Junior High School Department of No.2 Middle School is not bad, but the senior high school department is not good, AI 1
as a Guoyang person, you are welcome to play in Guoyang one day

3. It's not a Chinese teacher. I don't think it's a few buildings. However, it can be made clear that these are five independent units, because the area requirements of the two centers are lower than the sum of the minimum requirements of the three libraries. If the three libraries are the contents of the two centers, the data will be meaningless. So it can be inferred that the three halls are independent of the two centers

4. If you take a bus, you can take a bus from Kunming, the provincial capital, to Hefei.
when you get to Hefei bus station, you can take a bus from Hefei to Bozhou.

be careful not to be late.

if you are late, there will be no more.

the bus is relatively slow, and it takes about 15 hours to get there.

if you take the train, Take the train from Kunming to Hefei railway station.

and then transfer to Bozhou.

the train is not fast for a few hours, because when the train changes, It's troublesome.

as for the scenic spots,

I won't say much about Bozhou City.

there are Cao's Park, huaxilou, Cao Cao's clan tomb, Cao Cao's underground military transportation road,

almost all the scenic spots are pleasant.

Bozhou City is the best place to play.

there are many snacks everywhere.

shopping, Bozhou business city, The architectural structure of the trade city is very interesting. ~

in addition, there are several scenic spots in Bozhou City.

Laozi temple in Woyang is not interesting.
wanfota Park and Zhuangzi temple in Mengcheng County. Xuefeng Park in Banqiao Town, Mengcheng County, etc.

as for accommodation,

I feel that 200 yuan a night is too expensive

there are many hotels on Renmin Road

in addition, the big bath is very cheap, and you can also take a bath. Breakfast

the hotel nearby is 75-100.

I wish you a happy stay here~

5. After getting off the train, take a taxi for 4 yuan to the central bus station, and then take the bus from Bozhou to Woyang. The fare is 15 yuan. You can get there in about 1 hour and 20 minutes.

6. As you said, Anju district has two centers and five pavilions. Take bus No.22 to the terminal of happy ridge in the urban area (Chuanshan District), and then turn to bus No.3 to get to the terminal of two centers and five pavilions

7. Introction: Guoyang Chengguan School District Central School was established at the end of 2004. It is a "nine-year consistent system" school approved by the higher authorities. Its predecessor is Guoyang County Chengguan seventh primary school. The campus covers an area of more than 50 mu, with the most advanced plastic playground. The majestic science and ecation building, the newly completed comprehensive building, student apartments, restaurants and other gardens, rockeries, fountains complement each other. The computer room, laboratory, instrument room, book reading room, music room, dance room, painting and calligraphy room, multimedia classroom, etc. are complete, and the campus intelligent broadcasting network and distance ecation network are built. The school is a first-class modern school with unique geographical location and quiet and elegant teaching environment
registered capital: 3.7 million RMB

8. Like the people all over the country, I am very concerned about the "five week murder case in Anhui" recently. After reading the relevant reports of this case, my heart is very heavy and uncomfortable. As a legal person, seeing such cases constantly appearing, constantly refreshing our legal person's imagination, constantly breaking through all kinds of bottom lines that we can believe, my heart is very complicated. Once again, I would like to express my sincere respect to Lawyer Liu Jingjie and other lawyers in this case. Next, I will focus on five aspects
first, the vindication of this unjust, false and wrong case should make the highest decision-making level of our country realize that lawyers are an indispensable healthy force in this country and a very important constructive force for the development, progress and long-term stability of the whole country. This case should allow the national high-level to have a new evaluation and understanding of the role and team of lawyers. Let's think about it. Such an unjust and false case has not been vindicated for a long time. For family members and lawyers, how can they maintain their confidence in the rule of law in this country? If a country is full of unjust and false cases and unfair justice, but without any correction and relief mechanism, can the country be stable? In a single case, lawyers may stand on the opposite side of public power, the government, public security organs or procuratorial organs, and sometimes even the court. But don't forget that the only weapon of lawyers is law, the only way of working is language persuasion, and the only effect is to help citizens defend themselves. If a lawyer's work is effective, he must be helping to implement the country's laws and help the country to achieve justice. And isn't this fundamentally a good thing for the country and the people
secondly, the problem of extorting confessions by torture occurs in almost all unjust and false cases. The murder case of Wuzhou in Anhui Province happened 21 years ago. Generally speaking, extorting a confession by torture at that time was much more serious than it is now. Through so many years of efforts, it should be said that in ordinary criminal cases, the component of extorting confessions by torture has indeed decreased a lot. However, I can also be equally responsible to tell you that from my experience as a criminal defense lawyer, extorting confessions by torture, deceiving confessions and incing confessions are far from extinct. I worked as a prosecutor in Suzhou for seven years and a criminal defense lawyer in Shanghai for four years. It should be said that Shanghai and Suzhou are places where the rule of law is relatively developed and the level of rule of law is relatively high, but there are also illegal evidence collection in these places. But now the way is not the same as before. Generally, there is no direct physical contact or direct beating. Now there are more threats, fatigue interrogation, confession incement, confession deception and so on. For example, threatening to arrest your family members, giving you mitigated treatment after confessing or obtaining l pending trial, and so on. Many false confessions have been obtained in such a way. On the one hand, the illegal evidence collection in the investigation stage has not disappeared, and there are a lot of false confessions. On the other hand, the current situation of taking oral confession as the main basis of verdict has not changed, and the trial centered litigation system has not yet formed. What's more, procuratorial organs and courts usually have an undefended sense of trust in public security evidence collection, which sometimes makes our lawyers feel terrible. As a lawyer, when I meet with clients or verify with witnesses, they will tell me the reason why I made untrue statements or testimony at that time, because the investigators promised them that they would be OK after speaking, and if they didn't, they would check something else to threaten them. These threats or temptations are difficult to leave traces and obtain evidence, so prosecutors and judges generally will not accept them. Nowadays, many public prosecutors, especially legal prosecutors, even think that unjust, false and wrong cases are the past. Some even think that unjust, false and wrong cases are the price that must be paid to maintain social order. If this kind of misunderstanding is not cleared up, the consequences will be quite serious
on eliminating illegal evidence, I repeatedly emphasize that public prosecutors should allow lawyers to be present when interrogating suspect and asking witnesses. This system can eliminate the vast majority of extortion of confessions by torture and deception. This is a common practice in many countries. I believe that what other countries can do, our country can do as well. And it doesn't require audio or video, and it's cheap< Thirdly, the presumption of innocence and the leniency of suspected crime are discussed. In recent years, everyone has been familiar with the theory of no suspect and presumption of innocence, but why does it appear again and again that the suspect is lighter? We saw it very clearly in the surging report on the five week case. At that time, when he was sent back for retrial, the collegial panel formed two opinions: one was that he should be acquitted, and the other was that there was still evidence to prove that he was suspected of committing a crime. If he was released, he would connive at the crime. I used to be a public prosecutor. Frankly speaking, many people in the system have this view. They think that although the evidence is not enough, it may not be collected for objective reasons. After all, the evidence is always collected afterwards. For example, in the Wuzhou case, when the police could not find the murder weapon, they took a kitchen knife in the kitchen of the defendant's house. But it can't prove that it's a kitchen knife used to kill people. Who doesn't have a kitchen knife at home? Moreover, there are contradictions between the confessions of the defendants in the first trial, the confessions themselves are unstable, and there are contradictions between the testimony of the witnesses. However, the collegial panel thinks that there is some evidence to prove that the defendant may be suspected of committing a crime, and they will think that this is a case of vital importance. What if the murderer is wrongly placed? So they're scared. In fact, many legal people in our country do not really understand a truth, that is, why should we insist on the principle of no suspected crime rather than the principle of light suspected crime? I gave a lecture in the Law School of East China Normal University a few days ago, and I put forward a sentence at that time: no injustice in the world is far more valuable than no thief in the world. It is of course necessary for our criminal law to punish murderers and uphold justice through a whole set of state machinery. But the problem is that the most important thing for a country is to prevent crime. How to prevent crime? The most fundamental way is to rely on equal wealth distribution mechanism, high-quality ecation, smooth channels of expression and justice of the judicial system. No society is perfect, there must be a fish out of the net. No matter how well the society develops, there will still be people committing crimes. What should we do at this time? We have a whole set of means to restrict crime, such as the unified national identity investigation and control system, fingerprint system, increasingly powerful investigation technology, ubiquitous monitoring probe, etc. If a person plans to commit a crime, he will be restricted everywhere, so the harm caused by a single person's crime is small after all. But without evidence, people can be arrested at will without sufficient evidence. Once this breakthrough is made, it is not indivials who commit crimes, but a whole set of state machines. Compared with the crime committed by a single indivial, the uncontrolled power and the rule of law without evidence are the real social killers. Without evidence, we can extort a confession by torture and make a confession by torture. Theoretically speaking, everyone may become the victim of unjust, false and wrong cases. If justice cannot be held in one place, the whole line will collapse. It is better to put a hundred wrongly than to kill one by mistake. If the released person is the real murderer, what should be reviewed is why the legal net is not tight enough? Why can't we collect enough evidence through various channels? A little comparison shows that the higher the degree of rule of law, the lower the crime rate. It is precisely those places where the law is strict and the rule of law is not emphasized, but the higher the crime rate
fourthly, the issue of appeal comes next. It took 21 years for the case to be vindicated, and the judge in charge said that he knew it was an unjust case that year. It's terrible. We often say that it's late justice, and late justice is better than no justice. In recent years, the highest level of the country attaches great importance to the vindication of unjust, false and wrong cases, and a large number of cases that have not been solved for years have been vindicated one after another. It should be said that this is a progress and we must affirm it. However, there are also many problems exposed in this appeal case, such as the indifference and irresponsibility of the judiciary, the long-term appeal is not paid attention to, and even in turn, the plaintiff or his lawyer is required to proce the evidence of innocence. This practice is not unique to Anhui, but a common problem in all the appeal cases in China. After the judgment comes into effect, if we want to appeal, the judicial organ will reverse the burden of proof and ask the plaintiff to provide evidence. But how does the plaintiff provide evidence? He was deprived of his personal freedom and could not collect evidence. The lawyer's right to investigate and collect evidence was greatly limited. Our country does not recognize private detectives. In China, the right of lawyers to investigate and collect evidence is very small, restricted by various visible and invisible factors. The vast majority of criminal lawyers are not willing to investigate and collect evidence, especially the evidence about confession, because the risk is too great. It is very difficult for the plaintiff to show evidence to prove that he did not commit the crime and that he was wrongly sentenced in that year, which is also against the provisions of the criminal procere law
how should we define unjust, false and wrong cases? When the case was judged that year, if the evidence system on which the judgment was based could not meet the proof requirements stipulated by the law at that time, it was a case of injustice and falsehood. The plaintiff only needs to prove that the judgment at that time was made when the evidence did not meet the legal standard of proof. Many people may say that although the existing evidence can not prove that you are the murderer, it does not mean that you are innocent. In fact, you are the murderer. The typical case is the Fujian nianbin case. Nian Bin was finally acquitted by the court, but the Public Security Bureau continued to investigate him, and continued to lock him down as a suspect, or even restrict his exit. Only God knows whether a person has committed a crime or not. What do we judge by? We can only rely on evidence. If there's no evidence that a person killed someone, he didn't. There is no saying that the law acquitted him, but he is still guilty in essence, because that statement itself is against the rule of law. All of us outsiders, including the judiciary, cannot and should not make any judgment beyond the evidence
fifthly, we will talk about the issue of accountability for unjust, false and wrong cases. After being acquitted in court, the five wrongdoers in this case said that they would rather not receive state compensation than pursue responsibility, which is another heavy topic. A few days ago, I sent a microblog saying that the accountability procere should be started immediately. This case involves the arrest of witnesses, the threat to arrest lawyers, and the extortion of confessions by torture. Although the verdict does not identify extorting a confession by torture, it is a very simple common sense. How can a person who has not killed himself admit that he has killed himself if he has not been extorted a confession by torture? In practice, if the testimony of a witness is changed in a case, the public security organ will doubt whether it is the lawyer who makes small moves in the middle and arrest the lawyer for the crime of perjury and obstruction of testimony. However, in this case, those who openly extort confessions by torture, those who openly let witnesses give false testimony, and those who openly threatened to arrest lawyers were not prosecuted. The purpose of pursuing responsibility is not revenge, but a helpless way. We warn and prevent others from doing such things by pursuing responsibility. It is difficult to vindicate unjust cases, but it is more difficult to recover responsibility for wrong cases than to vindicate them. This is obviously not normal< b

9. The first bus from the county to Tianjing Palace (also known as Laozi Temple) is 6:00, and the last bus is 18:00. Each bus takes 8 minutes, and the whole fare is 1 yuan<

Tianjing palace in Guoyang County, Anhui Province is located in Zhengdian village, Zhabei Town, north of Guoyang City, five kilometers away from the center of the county. It was built by the local people to commemorate Laozi, the great thinker of the spring and Autumn period and the founder of Taoism [surnamed Li, name Er, word Boyang, today's Woyang people in Bozhou]. The palace is adjacent to the vortex River in the south, surrounded by Wujia River (ancient valley water) on three sides, and the peak of Longshan mountain in the north. It can be said that it is the land of mountains and rivers and the hometown of Zhong lingyuxiu. Tianjing palace was built in the eighth year of Yanxi (AD 165) of the Eastern Han Dynasty, and was called Laozi temple. Local officials built temples and ancestral halls in memory of Lao Tzu. He also ordered Chen xiangbianshao to write a tablet of Laozi Ming. Since then, the temples have been built by imperial edicts in the third year of the Wei and Huang dynasties (222) and the first year of the kaihuang Dynasty (581). In the Tang Dynasty, Lao Tzu was regarded as the ancestor of the Tang Dynasty. He was highly respected and canonized many times. He respected this temple as the ancestral temple, and built it in a grand way. Gaozu Wude three years (620), Taizong Zhenguan six years (627), gaozongqian first year (666), Wuzhou guangzhai first year (684), have been built in this palace, its resplendent, magnificent, not inferior to the imperial capital. Xuanzong Tianbao two years (743 years) Qinfeng this palace for Taiqing palace. At the end of the Tang Dynasty, it was destroyed by war and almost in ruins. From 1014 to 1018, the palace was rebuilt by imperial edict, and its appearance is more beautiful than that of Tang Dynasty. Hanlin scholar Sheng Du wrote a monument. In the chaos of Jingkang, the palace was first robbed by soldiers and then attacked by fire. Although it was built repeatedly in Jin Dynasty, the scale is far from that in Tang and Song dynasties. Since the emperor Shizu of the Yuan Dynasty, Taoism has flourished again. This palace has been newly built and renamed Tianjing palace according to the Taoist doctrine. In the third year of Zhishun, Tianjing palace was built on a large scale again. Zhang Qiyan, the academician of the Imperial Academy, wrote a stele for this purpose, which was recorded in many ancient books and local chronicles. Decoration was carried out ring the reign of emperor Zhengde of Ming Dynasty and the eighth year of Emperor Kangxi of Qing Dynasty. During the reign of Qianlong and Jiaqing, it was still known as the grand and deep palace, with a beautiful scale, a statue in the middle, and a clear and strict way. At the end of the Qing Dynasty, wars continued frequently and temples became decadent; Shaodanzao cold waste grass, ask the auditorium empty stone Cattle & quot; He sighed
in the heyday of Tang and Song Dynasties, Tianjing palace had a grand scale, brilliant architecture, grand layout, beautiful scenery, quiet environment and incomparable in the sea. In the yuan and Ming Dynasties, the palace was magnificent, with Laojun hall in the middle and tall Chonglong as the main hall. There are Tianqi temple and Wen hall in the East, meteor garden, Notre Dame hall and jiulongjing in the south, taixiao palace and Yuhuang hall in the West and Sanqing hall in the north. In addition, Lingguan hall, chanting hall, bell tower, well Pavilion, guest room, Taoist house, Pao, kuyu and stables are all complete. There are more than 100 pillars. It covers an area of 3000 mu, with thousands of people engaged in food instry. The palace is full of palaces and green pines and cypresses. It is solemn, solemn, and has extraordinary momentum. It can be called the highest Taoist temple in China. The present Tianjing palace still has Tianjing palace, Tianqi temple, jiulongjing, Laozi Niang tomb and other buildings and relics related to Laozi. Tianqi temple, also known as Dongyue Temple and Laozi "old temple", is a well preserved ground building in the former site of Tianjing palace in Yuan Dynasty
in order to commemorate a generation of philosopher Lao Tzu, carry forward Taoist culture, rescue and restore the excellent cultural heritage of the Chinese nation, and expand cultural exchanges with the world, the restoration of Tianjing palace has been carried out under the support of Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and overseas people who value morality and respect Taoism, with Lao Tzu as a memorial site, Taoism as a research center, and Taoism as a scenic spot. After years of hard work, more than ten halls, including Laojun hall, Sanqing hall, spirit palace, Tianshi hall, Chongyang hall, God of wealth hall, Yuanchen hall, Laozu hall, Cihang hall, luzu hall and Dongyue Temple, have been launched and completed one after another. Tianjing palace is once again standing on the ancient earth, reappearing its former style. Tianjing palace complex is the main landmark building. At present, it has completed the construction of Laojun hall, Lingguan hall on the central axis of Taoist temple, Sanqing temple and other halls. Laojun hall is the main hall of Tianjing palace. It is restored according to the scale of Jiao Zuting and the regulations of Song Dynasty. It has nine ridges and double eaves. It is 47 meters long from east to west, 28 meters deep from south to north, and 23.75 meters high. Standing on the 2-meter high Chongtai, it can be called the first Hall of Taoist temple. There are three bronze statues of Laozi, Yinxi and Donghua emperor standing in the hall. Among them, Laozi is 5.5 meters high and weighs 6000 kg. At present, it is the largest bronze statue of Laozi in China, ranking the first in China. Jiulongjing is another major landscape in the Tianjing palace complex. It has been proved that jiulongjing is located on the east side of the Tianjing palace wall. One of the wells was identified by archaeology as a "waquan well" in the spring and Autumn period. Now a well pavilion has been built to protect it. Jiulongjing is the first well in China. It shows that the local people in Guoyang began to commemorate Laozi long ago
Tianjing palace, which is the most magnificent Taoist temple in China, is planned to be built in the third phase of the project this year. The key construction content of the third phase of the project is to protect the jiulongjing well, restore the ancient meteor garden, and reproce the scenes of ancient times. At present, according to the national standard of AAAA scenic spot, Tianjing palace constantly improves the infrastructure and improves the service function. In the near future, Tianjing palace will become a famous tourist attraction in Bozhou City, Anhui Province and even the whole country