The most popular decentralization project on the market
Publish: 2021-04-20 13:56:14
1. Defi, a decentralized trading platform, is more reliable. I think it's a professional platform. It's a better platform because it has a wide range of radiation
2. bitcoin, Leyte coin, dogcoin, Diandian coin, American card coin, bitstock, dark coin, black coin, Ruibo coin, Malaysian coin, Mediterranean coin, Yuanbao coin, Zhaocai coin, sand coin, network gold
3. In fact, decentralization is equivalent to multi centralization. This is the characteristic of blockchain technology. Everyone has the right to participate. Now blockchain projects are very popular. There is a SMIC blockchain service platform project initiated by Changsha high tech Zone, which is now in the formal operation stage. It has also been selected as a key project of Hunan blockchain. The next step is to recruit enterprises to join the chain.
4. It can be transferred by the will of the people around, not by the central opinion. Constantly make changes to achieve longer-term goals.
5. Hello, it's a great honor to be here to answer your question. The following are some of my views on this issue. If there are any mistakes, please point them out. Take the blockchain network mutual aid platform for example. The performance of decentralization in this platform is as follows:
open and transparent
open and transparent. Once all the information recorded on the blockchain is difficult to tamper with and cannot be hidden, users can check it at any time. Generally speaking, as long as the real name authentication is added to the plan, the blockchain will generate nodes, No one can modify (including the platform)
never downtime
the blockchain based on the public chain is not affected by any institution or indivial. As long as the incentive mechanism is effective and the Internet exists, the blockchain will exist. Generally speaking, since the platform service personnel are not available, the platform machine has been working
democratic decision-making
bottom up decision-making, blockchain proposes a variety of different consensus mechanisms to help users effectively form bottom-up decision-making and jointly participate in major decisions. Generally speaking, if the platform wants to modify a thing, for example, the content of the plan can only be carried out after more than half of the people participate in the voting, or the application for mutual aid needs mutual aid fund. When more than half of the people do not agree with the publicity, the platform will not pass. Thank you very much for your patience. If you have any help, please accept it. I wish you a happy life! thank you!
open and transparent
open and transparent. Once all the information recorded on the blockchain is difficult to tamper with and cannot be hidden, users can check it at any time. Generally speaking, as long as the real name authentication is added to the plan, the blockchain will generate nodes, No one can modify (including the platform)
never downtime
the blockchain based on the public chain is not affected by any institution or indivial. As long as the incentive mechanism is effective and the Internet exists, the blockchain will exist. Generally speaking, since the platform service personnel are not available, the platform machine has been working
democratic decision-making
bottom up decision-making, blockchain proposes a variety of different consensus mechanisms to help users effectively form bottom-up decision-making and jointly participate in major decisions. Generally speaking, if the platform wants to modify a thing, for example, the content of the plan can only be carried out after more than half of the people participate in the voting, or the application for mutual aid needs mutual aid fund. When more than half of the people do not agree with the publicity, the platform will not pass. Thank you very much for your patience. If you have any help, please accept it. I wish you a happy life! thank you!
6. This is the second part of a series of articles on "key elements of becoming a better blockchain". Although decentralization is not an end in itself, it is a means to many ends, including resistance to censorship, corruption and collusion. Inclusive institutions with multi participation; And a fair distribution of wealth, power and influence. Decentralization is not suitable for most applications because of its low efficiency and high cost. However, for those applications that need decentralization, the underlying platform is much more reliable than the oral decentralized services. Did we go to the center? I want to remind us that decentralization is multidimensional, far from binary. Another closely related topic is unlicensed authorization, which will also be discussed here: allowing anyone anywhere to contribute to a project, platform or community is one of the most important parts of the spirit of decentralization
are there multiple client applications? There are two schools of thought. One assumption is that a single normative client application can concentrate limited resources on one project, and a development team can communicate more easily, which will maximize the success rate and competitiveness compared with other platforms. In addition, a single client application can prevent consensus failure caused by local account book inconsistency of different nodes (at least as long as each node upgrades its software after hard forking). On the other hand, the existence of multiple clients will make the network more likely to survive attacks (one client may stop block proction completely) or consensus failure (one or more clients cannot run the protocol correctly, which may lead to wrong block or stop block proction completely). In fact, both happened in Ethereum. But there are more subtle reasons. Firstly, the parallel application of multiple clients reces the dominant influence of a single core development team on the network, which is one of the biggest problems of bitcoin governance (zcash foundation will also decide to build a second zcash client to balance the power of electric coin). Moreover, different clients may make different architecture decisions and have different advantages (for example, mining, data search), and using different languages to write clients can enable more developers to participate in core development. Although parallel applications and beta applications are very good, the mainstream is the main network client: for example, bitcoin has at least 15 client applications, but 97% of the nodes run a program, that is, bitcoin core
how many organizations control mining computing power? The more parties involved in mining, the more difficult it is to collude with each other to engage in selfish mining, or to engage in double flower attacks (commonly known as 51% attacks, but the actual mathematical principles are more complex). This is not a hypothetical risk, as it has occurred in networks such as Ethereum classic and bitcoin gold. In addition, more miners means a fairer distribution of mining rewards. Although many indivial miners may participate in mining, because of incentives, they will gather in a few mines, and even a seemingly decentralized network may rely on a few entities for Mining: the three largest Ethereum mines jointly control 60% of the total power, while bitcoin's top four mines account for about 56%.
are there multiple client applications? There are two schools of thought. One assumption is that a single normative client application can concentrate limited resources on one project, and a development team can communicate more easily, which will maximize the success rate and competitiveness compared with other platforms. In addition, a single client application can prevent consensus failure caused by local account book inconsistency of different nodes (at least as long as each node upgrades its software after hard forking). On the other hand, the existence of multiple clients will make the network more likely to survive attacks (one client may stop block proction completely) or consensus failure (one or more clients cannot run the protocol correctly, which may lead to wrong block or stop block proction completely). In fact, both happened in Ethereum. But there are more subtle reasons. Firstly, the parallel application of multiple clients reces the dominant influence of a single core development team on the network, which is one of the biggest problems of bitcoin governance (zcash foundation will also decide to build a second zcash client to balance the power of electric coin). Moreover, different clients may make different architecture decisions and have different advantages (for example, mining, data search), and using different languages to write clients can enable more developers to participate in core development. Although parallel applications and beta applications are very good, the mainstream is the main network client: for example, bitcoin has at least 15 client applications, but 97% of the nodes run a program, that is, bitcoin core
how many organizations control mining computing power? The more parties involved in mining, the more difficult it is to collude with each other to engage in selfish mining, or to engage in double flower attacks (commonly known as 51% attacks, but the actual mathematical principles are more complex). This is not a hypothetical risk, as it has occurred in networks such as Ethereum classic and bitcoin gold. In addition, more miners means a fairer distribution of mining rewards. Although many indivial miners may participate in mining, because of incentives, they will gather in a few mines, and even a seemingly decentralized network may rely on a few entities for Mining: the three largest Ethereum mines jointly control 60% of the total power, while bitcoin's top four mines account for about 56%.
7. US $1 = RMB 6.516
1 RMB ≈ US $0.1535
US $40599 = RMB 264543.084
the data is for reference only, and the transaction price at the bank counter shall prevail. Update time: 2021-03-24 08:47
1 RMB ≈ US $0.1535
US $40599 = RMB 264543.084
the data is for reference only, and the transaction price at the bank counter shall prevail. Update time: 2021-03-24 08:47
8. You don't have to worry about any projects. As long as you need to invest, you should be careful. Now the so-called projects are all under the guise of blockchain and going to the center. In fact, they are all just the same set of codes with different names. As long as you control your greedy desire, you can play.
Hot content