Digital currency AHC
Publish: 2021-03-30 07:57:12
1. Morse code, Enigma code, Virginia code
Morse code is a kind of time on time off signal code, which expresses different English letters, numbers and punctuation marks through different order. It was invented in 1837 by a controversial American, Samuel Morse or Alfred weir. Morse code is an early form of digital communication, but it is different from modern binary code which only uses zero and one or two states. Its code includes five kinds: dot, stroke, pause between dots, short pause between each character (between dot and stroke), medium pause between each word and long pause between sentences
in 1918, German inventors Arthur Scherbius and Richard Ritter founded a new technology application company. Scherbius, who had studied electrical application, wanted to use modern electrical technology to replace manual coding encryption method and invent a machine that can automatically encode. Shelbius named his electric coding machine enigma. At first glance, it looks like a box full of complex and delicate components. At first glance, it looks like a typewriter
it can be simply divided into three parts. People expand the multi table password on the basis of a single Caesar password, which is called "Virginia password". It was invented by bleyser Virginia of Henry III in the 16th century. It is characterized by combining 26 Caesar watches into one sub meter: keyboard, rotor and display.
Morse code is a kind of time on time off signal code, which expresses different English letters, numbers and punctuation marks through different order. It was invented in 1837 by a controversial American, Samuel Morse or Alfred weir. Morse code is an early form of digital communication, but it is different from modern binary code which only uses zero and one or two states. Its code includes five kinds: dot, stroke, pause between dots, short pause between each character (between dot and stroke), medium pause between each word and long pause between sentences
in 1918, German inventors Arthur Scherbius and Richard Ritter founded a new technology application company. Scherbius, who had studied electrical application, wanted to use modern electrical technology to replace manual coding encryption method and invent a machine that can automatically encode. Shelbius named his electric coding machine enigma. At first glance, it looks like a box full of complex and delicate components. At first glance, it looks like a typewriter
it can be simply divided into three parts. People expand the multi table password on the basis of a single Caesar password, which is called "Virginia password". It was invented by bleyser Virginia of Henry III in the 16th century. It is characterized by combining 26 Caesar watches into one sub meter: keyboard, rotor and display.
2. Financial management must find a formal platform, must not covet high interest, find some small platform, now basically outside informal financial companies are: you think about his interest, he thinks about your principal!
3. Landlord, to be honest, there is no unified standard for compensation for sunshine right at present, but courts all over the country have relevant compensation cases. For details, you can consult the local lawyer in the place where the house is located and engage him in litigation
it may be helpful to find some relevant information for you
Beijing's sunshine right dispute once provided for a one-time compensation of 800-2000 yuan, Changsha's compensation of 110 yuan per square meter, Tianjin's compensation of 120 yuan per square meter, and Jingzhou's subsidy of 1.12 yuan per day for each of the five households
"Chen Xu, member of the real estate professional committee of Beijing Lawyers Association" different regions have different judgments, and everyone has their own discretion. Therefore, from the legislative point of view, there is indeed this problem. Is there a very scientific and accurate figure, that is, because I have affected your lighting, objectively, it has caused me other potential and quantifiable losses, and how to make up for it. Some people feel that compensation alone is meaningless, and how to eliminate the infringement is the most important thing. Experts suggest that although the property law has been promulgated, the specific tort liability of sunshine right should be clarified in the implementation rules in the future< Since January 1 of this year, the maximum compensation per square meter can reach 700 yuan
the sunlight of residential buildings 287 and 297, Xingshun Street, Tiexi District has been blocked, and 16 residents have sued to the court for the right to sunlight. However, in the first instance, they were rejected by the court because they did not submit the identification report. What is the basis of daylighting right damage? How to compensate? According to what standard? This newspaper paid attention to this case on February 23 last year. On January 3 this year, the reporter learned that the residents won the lawsuit in the second instance, and they got compensation according to the derogatory value of the house< In October 2001, Liaoning Jinpeng Housing Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinpeng company) developed and constructed three "doctoral buildings of Shenyang University of technology" on the east side of residential buildings No. 287 and 297, Xingshun Street, Tiexi District. Since the foundation of the building was laid, the residents of the two buildings have been worried about whether the new building will block our light? When the building was about to be completed, residents found that there was less and less sunlight in the east facing houses. After negotiating with development companies and universities again and again, things finally turned for the better< On August 21, 2002, Tiexi Branch of Municipal Bureau of planning, land and resources and Shenyang University of technology jointly issued a notice to inform the residents to come to Jinpeng company to discuss with the coordination group on the issue of light blocking compensation. Resident Yu Xiaoren said: "they have given specific compensation standards for light blocking, that is, 2000 yuan for each window facing east, 1000 yuan for each floor down, and 3000 yuan for the window facing west hill of doctor's building." In this way, a family's compensation will not exceed 10000 yuan at most, and many have asked for compensation
however, there are still 16 households who do not compromise, but seek legal channels for the right to sunshine< On April 28, 2004, entrusted by the people's Court of Tiexi District, Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute appraised the actual sunshine time of the residential houses of the sued residents
on June 8 of that year, the identification results showed that the lighting time of the least household was only 5 minutes. But the residents are not satisfied with the identification results. "We don't even have a minute of sunshine in our house. How can we calculate that there are 35 minutes?" said Ms. Chen of 143 households in 279 building? The daylight time should be calculated from the time when there is sunshine all over the house. " Xiao Jingzheng, from 243 households in 279 building, said: "the daylight time measured for us is 116 minutes, which we can't accept. It is said that the compensation for daylighting right is based on the standard of 2 hours. In that case, we may only be compensated for the loss of 4 minutes. But we have suffered a great loss. I'd like to ask for compensation of 40000 yuan. " Yu Xiaoren said: "I claim compensation for my calcium and nutrition costs, the depreciation of the right to use the house, electricity costs, etc., totaling more than 100000 yuan."
as these residents did not proce strong evidence for the above facts, on December 31, 2005, Tiexi District Court ruled to reject their claims according to relevant laws and regulations< After that, Xiao Jingzheng and other residents filed an appeal. In December 2006, in the second instance of the court, they reluctantly proposed to take the previous appraisal report of Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute as evidence, and applied for appraisal of the house depreciation caused by light blocking. Entrusted by the municipal court, Liaoning new Shifang Real Estate Appraisal Co., Ltd. made an appraisal report on the depreciation of houses. In the appraisal conclusion, the value loss of Xiao Jingzheng's house caused by light blocking was 16125 yuan, which became the final basis for the court to decide compensation<
the municipal court held that the actual sunshine time of Xiao Jingzheng's living room on a cold day was 116 minutes, which was lower than the 2-hour sunshine time stipulated in the code for planning and design of urban residential areas, and the three doctor's buildings had formed a light barrier for Xiao Jingzheng's house. Although the appraisal report is not new evidence, considering the fact that light blocking does exist, according to Article 5 of the general principles of civil law of the people's Republic of China, "the legitimate civil rights and interests of citizens and legal persons shall be protected by law, and no organization or indivial shall infringe upon them", the Court adopted the appraisal conclusion issued by Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute, Liaoning Jinpeng Housing Development Co., Ltd. and Shenyang University of technology were sentenced to compensate Xiao Jingzheng 16125 yuan for the depreciation loss caused by light blocking; Other residents with less than two hours of sunshine also received compensation< According to the latest statement,
the maximum compensation per square meter is 700 yuan,
judge Guan Yunguang of the second people's Court of the Municipal People's court said: in the past, because the provisions of laws and regulations on the compensation for the infringement of the right to daylighting were too general, there were many legal difficulties in the cases of the infringement of the right to daylighting and the right to ventilation. From the perspective of trial, it is a big problem to determine the standard of compensation. No one is sure how much impact the residential buildings are blocked from sunlight and obstructed ventilation will have on the residents' health. Moreover, with different populations and different ages, how can we compensate for the physical damage caused by lack of sunlight? Generally, the judge will make a judgment according to the actual derogatory value of the house
however, since January 1 this year, our city has set a clear standard for light blocking compensation. According to the newly issued regulations on the management of residential building spacing and residential sunshine in Shenyang, if the newly-built buildings block the surrounding original houses e to the limitation of land use conditions and can not reach the standard of 2 hours in cold weather, the construction unit can negotiate with the blocked households before going through the planning approval proceres, and purchase the houses or replace the houses according to the market evaluation price. If the negotiation fails, the construction unit and the light blocked residents can be divided according to different regional levels and different shielding time, and a one-time economic compensation ranging from 260 yuan to 700 yuan per square meter will be given. In other words, from now on, if your 100 square meter house is blocked from light, you can get a maximum economic compensation of 70000 yuan. Our reporter Zhou Xianzhong
(Shenyang daily)
it may be helpful to find some relevant information for you
Beijing's sunshine right dispute once provided for a one-time compensation of 800-2000 yuan, Changsha's compensation of 110 yuan per square meter, Tianjin's compensation of 120 yuan per square meter, and Jingzhou's subsidy of 1.12 yuan per day for each of the five households
"Chen Xu, member of the real estate professional committee of Beijing Lawyers Association" different regions have different judgments, and everyone has their own discretion. Therefore, from the legislative point of view, there is indeed this problem. Is there a very scientific and accurate figure, that is, because I have affected your lighting, objectively, it has caused me other potential and quantifiable losses, and how to make up for it. Some people feel that compensation alone is meaningless, and how to eliminate the infringement is the most important thing. Experts suggest that although the property law has been promulgated, the specific tort liability of sunshine right should be clarified in the implementation rules in the future< Since January 1 of this year, the maximum compensation per square meter can reach 700 yuan
the sunlight of residential buildings 287 and 297, Xingshun Street, Tiexi District has been blocked, and 16 residents have sued to the court for the right to sunlight. However, in the first instance, they were rejected by the court because they did not submit the identification report. What is the basis of daylighting right damage? How to compensate? According to what standard? This newspaper paid attention to this case on February 23 last year. On January 3 this year, the reporter learned that the residents won the lawsuit in the second instance, and they got compensation according to the derogatory value of the house< In October 2001, Liaoning Jinpeng Housing Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinpeng company) developed and constructed three "doctoral buildings of Shenyang University of technology" on the east side of residential buildings No. 287 and 297, Xingshun Street, Tiexi District. Since the foundation of the building was laid, the residents of the two buildings have been worried about whether the new building will block our light? When the building was about to be completed, residents found that there was less and less sunlight in the east facing houses. After negotiating with development companies and universities again and again, things finally turned for the better< On August 21, 2002, Tiexi Branch of Municipal Bureau of planning, land and resources and Shenyang University of technology jointly issued a notice to inform the residents to come to Jinpeng company to discuss with the coordination group on the issue of light blocking compensation. Resident Yu Xiaoren said: "they have given specific compensation standards for light blocking, that is, 2000 yuan for each window facing east, 1000 yuan for each floor down, and 3000 yuan for the window facing west hill of doctor's building." In this way, a family's compensation will not exceed 10000 yuan at most, and many have asked for compensation
however, there are still 16 households who do not compromise, but seek legal channels for the right to sunshine< On April 28, 2004, entrusted by the people's Court of Tiexi District, Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute appraised the actual sunshine time of the residential houses of the sued residents
on June 8 of that year, the identification results showed that the lighting time of the least household was only 5 minutes. But the residents are not satisfied with the identification results. "We don't even have a minute of sunshine in our house. How can we calculate that there are 35 minutes?" said Ms. Chen of 143 households in 279 building? The daylight time should be calculated from the time when there is sunshine all over the house. " Xiao Jingzheng, from 243 households in 279 building, said: "the daylight time measured for us is 116 minutes, which we can't accept. It is said that the compensation for daylighting right is based on the standard of 2 hours. In that case, we may only be compensated for the loss of 4 minutes. But we have suffered a great loss. I'd like to ask for compensation of 40000 yuan. " Yu Xiaoren said: "I claim compensation for my calcium and nutrition costs, the depreciation of the right to use the house, electricity costs, etc., totaling more than 100000 yuan."
as these residents did not proce strong evidence for the above facts, on December 31, 2005, Tiexi District Court ruled to reject their claims according to relevant laws and regulations< After that, Xiao Jingzheng and other residents filed an appeal. In December 2006, in the second instance of the court, they reluctantly proposed to take the previous appraisal report of Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute as evidence, and applied for appraisal of the house depreciation caused by light blocking. Entrusted by the municipal court, Liaoning new Shifang Real Estate Appraisal Co., Ltd. made an appraisal report on the depreciation of houses. In the appraisal conclusion, the value loss of Xiao Jingzheng's house caused by light blocking was 16125 yuan, which became the final basis for the court to decide compensation<
the municipal court held that the actual sunshine time of Xiao Jingzheng's living room on a cold day was 116 minutes, which was lower than the 2-hour sunshine time stipulated in the code for planning and design of urban residential areas, and the three doctor's buildings had formed a light barrier for Xiao Jingzheng's house. Although the appraisal report is not new evidence, considering the fact that light blocking does exist, according to Article 5 of the general principles of civil law of the people's Republic of China, "the legitimate civil rights and interests of citizens and legal persons shall be protected by law, and no organization or indivial shall infringe upon them", the Court adopted the appraisal conclusion issued by Liaoning urban and rural construction planning and Design Institute, Liaoning Jinpeng Housing Development Co., Ltd. and Shenyang University of technology were sentenced to compensate Xiao Jingzheng 16125 yuan for the depreciation loss caused by light blocking; Other residents with less than two hours of sunshine also received compensation< According to the latest statement,
the maximum compensation per square meter is 700 yuan,
judge Guan Yunguang of the second people's Court of the Municipal People's court said: in the past, because the provisions of laws and regulations on the compensation for the infringement of the right to daylighting were too general, there were many legal difficulties in the cases of the infringement of the right to daylighting and the right to ventilation. From the perspective of trial, it is a big problem to determine the standard of compensation. No one is sure how much impact the residential buildings are blocked from sunlight and obstructed ventilation will have on the residents' health. Moreover, with different populations and different ages, how can we compensate for the physical damage caused by lack of sunlight? Generally, the judge will make a judgment according to the actual derogatory value of the house
however, since January 1 this year, our city has set a clear standard for light blocking compensation. According to the newly issued regulations on the management of residential building spacing and residential sunshine in Shenyang, if the newly-built buildings block the surrounding original houses e to the limitation of land use conditions and can not reach the standard of 2 hours in cold weather, the construction unit can negotiate with the blocked households before going through the planning approval proceres, and purchase the houses or replace the houses according to the market evaluation price. If the negotiation fails, the construction unit and the light blocked residents can be divided according to different regional levels and different shielding time, and a one-time economic compensation ranging from 260 yuan to 700 yuan per square meter will be given. In other words, from now on, if your 100 square meter house is blocked from light, you can get a maximum economic compensation of 70000 yuan. Our reporter Zhou Xianzhong
(Shenyang daily)
Hot content