China US talks cancelled due to China's digital currency

1.

The people's Bank of China has not issued digital currency for the time being, so there is no legal digital currency in China at present. At present, digital currency has not been recognized in China, let alone legal

at present, all kinds of digital currencies circulating in the market are basically on the edge of the law. China maintains a neutral attitude, but does not like speculation, which is also the basic attitude of the central bank{ RRRRR}

< H2 > development materials

digital currency is abbreviated as digiccy, which is the abbreviation of "digital currency" in English and the alternative currency in the form of electronic currency. Both digital gold coin and cryptocurrency belong to digiccy

digital currency is different from the virtual currency in the virtual world, because it can be used for real goods and services transactions, not limited to online games. The early digital currency (digital gold currency) is a form of electronic currency named after the weight of gold. Today's digital currency, such as bitcoin, lightcoin and ppcoin, is an electronic currency created, issued and circulated by check sum cryptography. It is characterized by the use of P2P peer-to-peer network technology to issue, manage and circulate currency. In theory, it avoids bureaucratic examination and approval, so that everyone has the right to issue currency

2. There are still many pilot cities for digital currency in China.

3. In my world, it's bedrock

4. 1. The Sino US statement is only a framework agreement, and the details need to be further discussed. The two sides agreed to "substantially rece the US trade deficit in goods with China", but trump has yet to see how China can rece it
2. How many trade barriers can be cut down in the non-tariff field? How strong is the protection of intellectual property rights? Can we lower the market access threshold in the fields of finance, telecommunication and automobile
3. Many things are still in chaos. The "ambition" of the United States is not only to rece the trade deficit of 200 billion US dollars, but also to "force China to carry out the so-called long-term reform", so the difficulty can be imagined
in fact, the United States is not against the "made in China 2025 plan", and he has no legitimate reason to oppose it. What he resisted was the government's support plan that distorted the market behavior. In other words, if China supports the development of related instries with market distorting subsidies, if these things are only digested at home, the United States will not be able to manage them. However, the United States believes that these procts can not be exported to the United States, which will have a price advantage and cause unfair market competition
5. The ZTE crisis has clearly told us that at this stage, for the United States, China is not absolutely lethal in the field of commercial high-end manufacturing. For the time being, Americans are not afraid that we will bring down their Qualcomm and Intel, but they are afraid that we will mp low-end handicrafts in the past, crush their low-end enterprises, and cause a large number of unemployment
6. Therefore, the U.S. is trying its best to make the "made in China 2025" plan difficult. The first purpose is to guard against China's subsidy war, and the second is to make obstacles to the transformation and upgrading of made in China. This kind of delay is easy.