File Ethereum
Publish: 2021-05-04 12:05:40
1.
bitcoin uses SHA-256 encryption algorithm. When mining, it competes with computing power. In order to improve computing power, bitcoin has gone through four stages: CPU mining, GPU mining, FPGA mining and now ASIC mining machine mining, and the degree of specialization is getting higher and higher
Ethereum uses the ethash encryption algorithm. In the process of mining, it needs to read the memory and store the DAG file. Because the bandwidth of each read memory is limited, and the existing computer technology is difficult to have a qualitative breakthrough in this problem, so no matter how to improve the computing efficiency of the computer, the memory read efficiency will not be greatly improved. Therefore, in a sense, Ethereum's ethash encryption algorithm is ASIC resistant.
different encryption algorithms lead to great differences in mining equipment and computing power between bitcoin and Ethereum
at present, bitcoin mining equipment is mainly ASIC mining machine with a very high degree of specialization. The maximum computing power of a single mining machine is 110t / s, and the scale of computing power of the whole network is more than 120eh / s
the main mining equipment of Ethereum is video card miner, and there are very few specialized ASIC miner. On the one hand, the "ASIC resistance" of Ethereum mining algorithm improves the threshold of developing ASIC miner. On the other hand, after Ethereum is upgraded to 2.0, the consensus mechanism will be transformed into POS, and the miner can not continue mining
compared with the ASIC miner, the graphics card miner has two orders of magnitude difference in computing power. At present, the computing power of mainstream graphics card miner (8 cards) is about 420mh / s, and that of Ethereum is about 230th / s.
from the time dimension of the past two years, bitcoin's computing power of the whole network is growing rapidly, while Ethereum's computing power of the whole network is growing relatively slowly
The ASIC mining machine of 
bitcoin is monopolized by several major mining machine manufacturers, and miners can only buy it from the market; Although the graphics card miner of Ethereum is also manufactured by a special miner, the miner can buy accessories from the market and assemble them according to his own demand
2. Core developer Mike Hearn: why bitcoin should be forked
2015-08-17 09:17:38 Views: key words: Mike
related reading: Mike Hearn: internal contradictions in the enterprise prevent Google from accepting bitcoin
Yes, it's coming. The community is beginning to separate, and bitcoin is about to bifurcate: including software, and perhaps blockchain. The two sides of the split are bitcoin core and the micro variant program based on the same program, called bitcoin XT. On August 16, Beijing time, there is now a full version of bitcoin XT
this bifurcation has never happened before. I want to explain this from the perspective of bitcoin XT developers: it can't be said that it hasn't been communicated enough
bitcoin bifurcation, this topic may make many people curious, so this article is written for ordinary readers. It doesn't involve the knowledge that has been debated before
the original version of bitcoin was carefully arranged by Nakamoto, and has always been very clear. The debate is about growth. In 2008, he answered the first question about the design of bitcoin, saying:
visa processed 37 billion transactions in fiscal year 2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. So many deals require 100GB of bandwidth = 12 DVDs or 2 HD quality movies = about $18 of bandwidth at the current price
assuming that the bitcoin network reaches this scale, it will take several years. By then, sending two HD movies over the Internet may not be a big deal
at that time, he was more tired of bitcoin expansion than any of us. His plan is to make bitcoin popular from the beginning, and he knows that this success will change how people use his system. In 2010, he said, "it's good that we keep [blockchain] files as small as possible
the final solution will not care how big it (blockchain file) becomes
but now, while it is still small, keep it in a small state, and the growth of new users will be faster. When I finally implement client only mode, it's no longer a problem
"
in 2011, through a series of calculations, I expanded the expansion intuition of Nakamoto in detail: if bitcoin becomes so popular, will it completely replace visa? The answer is that his plan is credible - you don't need anything else but a computer, even if there's so much traffic. Before he left, I also implemented the model he talked about
it was Nakamoto's plan that brought us together. It has changed the lives of thousands of people around the world. Some of us give up our jobs, others devote their spare time to the project, others set up companies and even travel around the world. This is an idea that ordinary people can complete mutual payment through blockchain and create this global community
that's the vision I signed, and that's the vision Gavin Andresen signed, and that's the vision signed by millions of developers, founders of startups, evangelists, and users around the world
and this vision is now in danger. In recent months, it's clear that a small group of people have completely different plans for bitcoin. These people have never really understood Nakamoto's intention because they are worried about success, if the technology has never been improved, if people can't run bitcoin on their home computers? Doesn't this make bitcoin move away from centralization and more like banking? What if people start to rely on bitcoin, even if it's imperfect
now, Nakamoto has chosen to disappear, and they want to make a major change: substantially increase transaction costs, end support for mobile P2P wallets, give up unconfirmed transactions, and many things that have never been found in the project's founding documents
the so-called lightning network, which is about to be promoted as a substitute for Nakamoto's design, does not exist. The white paper describes that it was announced earlier this year, and if it can be realized, it will be a huge departure from the bitcoin we know and love. Pick one of the many differences, and a bitcoin address won't work. What they will be replaced with has not yet been worked out (because no one knows). There are many other surprising pitfalls that I mentioned in another article. What will it eventually proce to make our existing bitcoin network better? It is still extremely unclear
what happened to the free market
in theory, none of this should be a problem. Lightning network is built on the blockchain, but it needs a rather trivial upgrade process to achieve the best function. Of course, people are willing to explore this direction, which is entirely possible. If the jobs they set up are better than the existing ordinary bitcoin network, then the market will choose their way, if so... It is fair competition for them! The current design of bitcoin is unlikely to be the final version for payment. This is a reasonable imagination, one day it will be eliminated in the competition, or enhanced by something else
but our system is working today. It has an ecosystem, including developers, exchanges, wallets, ATMs, books, applications, conferences, and many people have learned how it works
if there was a free choice, would people decide to move to a completely different system
we don't know, but the people who are pushing these things don't want the market to make a decision. That's what happened
a long time ago, Nakamoto set up a temporary "mixed brand assembly computer": he limited the size of each block to 1 MB. He did so in order to keep the blockchain in a small state in the early days, until we now call it the creation of SPV wallet (that is, what Nakamoto calls "client only mode"). As mentioned above, when the time comes, it can be adjusted. It has never been said that it is permanent. In the end, it becomes irrelevant. In 2011, I wrote the first SPV tool with my respected colleague Andreas schildbach, and we built the first and most popular Android wallet together. Since then, SPV wallets have been used on major platforms. Therefore, Nakamoto's reasons for this temporary restriction have been solved a long time ago
with the continuous growth of bitcoin, its blocks are also growing. Reasonable traffic forecasts show that the block will reach the current system limit sometime next year, at the latest in 2017. Another bubble or pressure cycle will force us to exceed that limit before, and the result may not be beautiful.
so it's time to raise the upper limit, or delete it completely. That's our plan, and the problem starts: those who don't want to see bitcoin expand have decided to postpone the process. They saw a beautiful, one-time opportunity to forcibly transfer bitcoin's predetermined path to a completely different technological trajectory. They don't know what this alternative design will be, and of course they haven't built it yet. But it doesn't matter. They believe that by blocking the growth of the blockchain, they can "motivate" (that is, force) the bitcoin community to switch to different things, something more in line with their personal technical taste
why restrict blockchain
so far, I haven't explained much about these people or who they are. I think it's a very time-consuming and laborious thing to name names in this article, and it seems to be futile in the end. Presumably those who care about this matter already know it, and those who don't know it can't recognize the people who are involved in it
I just want to say that they are very few people who have access to the bitcoin core code base, or those who are convinced by their arguments
therefore, we will not discuss these arguments here, which has been too much. Gavin and I have written articles to analyze the questions raised by everyone to refute them. Sometimes the answer is some common sense, some will be more in-depth, need more work, such as network simulation
the best place to understand these controversies is in Gavin's blog. I hope to find a link to a collection of opinions similar to those refuting Gavin's point of view, but none of them
to sum up, in the long and hard debate, several different opposition groups:
if bitcoin approaches this limit, we will be stimulated to create something better
the limit should be raised, but it is not ready (the actual time is not specified)
if bitcoin is expanded and becomes more centralized, it will no longer be bitcoin< Other people: if the objections you support are not listed above, please check Gavin's blog and find out the answer
the first point may become a reality one day, but it is not comparable with the theoretical system on paper. But no one who has seen any alternative solutions on the table thinks they can be implemented within 12 months (see another example in the last paragraph, for example)... Even assuming they are better. This is also an example of the nirvana fallacy:
the nirvana fallacy refers to the name of the informal fallacy of some unrealistic and idealized substitutes for something more practical. It can also refer to the tendency to think that there is a perfect solution to a specific problem, so it is also called perfectionism fallacy
it's obviously advantageous to create an imitative dichotomy for a current choice. But it's also totally incredible. One who uses the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. According to this fallacy, the choice is not between real-world solutions. One is a realistic solution, and the other is an impractical solution, which is the "better" choice between the two
the answer to the second objection is too vague. It is reasonable to believe that the overall upgrade of each bitcoin node may take one year, and the actual bitcoin network capacity overload will cause serious damage. We really should be ready before that. In the bitcoin development mailing list, there are two people who have professional capacity planning experience, and both of them have
2015-08-17 09:17:38 Views: key words: Mike
related reading: Mike Hearn: internal contradictions in the enterprise prevent Google from accepting bitcoin
Yes, it's coming. The community is beginning to separate, and bitcoin is about to bifurcate: including software, and perhaps blockchain. The two sides of the split are bitcoin core and the micro variant program based on the same program, called bitcoin XT. On August 16, Beijing time, there is now a full version of bitcoin XT
this bifurcation has never happened before. I want to explain this from the perspective of bitcoin XT developers: it can't be said that it hasn't been communicated enough
bitcoin bifurcation, this topic may make many people curious, so this article is written for ordinary readers. It doesn't involve the knowledge that has been debated before
the original version of bitcoin was carefully arranged by Nakamoto, and has always been very clear. The debate is about growth. In 2008, he answered the first question about the design of bitcoin, saying:
visa processed 37 billion transactions in fiscal year 2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. So many deals require 100GB of bandwidth = 12 DVDs or 2 HD quality movies = about $18 of bandwidth at the current price
assuming that the bitcoin network reaches this scale, it will take several years. By then, sending two HD movies over the Internet may not be a big deal
at that time, he was more tired of bitcoin expansion than any of us. His plan is to make bitcoin popular from the beginning, and he knows that this success will change how people use his system. In 2010, he said, "it's good that we keep [blockchain] files as small as possible
the final solution will not care how big it (blockchain file) becomes
but now, while it is still small, keep it in a small state, and the growth of new users will be faster. When I finally implement client only mode, it's no longer a problem
"
in 2011, through a series of calculations, I expanded the expansion intuition of Nakamoto in detail: if bitcoin becomes so popular, will it completely replace visa? The answer is that his plan is credible - you don't need anything else but a computer, even if there's so much traffic. Before he left, I also implemented the model he talked about
it was Nakamoto's plan that brought us together. It has changed the lives of thousands of people around the world. Some of us give up our jobs, others devote their spare time to the project, others set up companies and even travel around the world. This is an idea that ordinary people can complete mutual payment through blockchain and create this global community
that's the vision I signed, and that's the vision Gavin Andresen signed, and that's the vision signed by millions of developers, founders of startups, evangelists, and users around the world
and this vision is now in danger. In recent months, it's clear that a small group of people have completely different plans for bitcoin. These people have never really understood Nakamoto's intention because they are worried about success, if the technology has never been improved, if people can't run bitcoin on their home computers? Doesn't this make bitcoin move away from centralization and more like banking? What if people start to rely on bitcoin, even if it's imperfect
now, Nakamoto has chosen to disappear, and they want to make a major change: substantially increase transaction costs, end support for mobile P2P wallets, give up unconfirmed transactions, and many things that have never been found in the project's founding documents
the so-called lightning network, which is about to be promoted as a substitute for Nakamoto's design, does not exist. The white paper describes that it was announced earlier this year, and if it can be realized, it will be a huge departure from the bitcoin we know and love. Pick one of the many differences, and a bitcoin address won't work. What they will be replaced with has not yet been worked out (because no one knows). There are many other surprising pitfalls that I mentioned in another article. What will it eventually proce to make our existing bitcoin network better? It is still extremely unclear
what happened to the free market
in theory, none of this should be a problem. Lightning network is built on the blockchain, but it needs a rather trivial upgrade process to achieve the best function. Of course, people are willing to explore this direction, which is entirely possible. If the jobs they set up are better than the existing ordinary bitcoin network, then the market will choose their way, if so... It is fair competition for them! The current design of bitcoin is unlikely to be the final version for payment. This is a reasonable imagination, one day it will be eliminated in the competition, or enhanced by something else
but our system is working today. It has an ecosystem, including developers, exchanges, wallets, ATMs, books, applications, conferences, and many people have learned how it works
if there was a free choice, would people decide to move to a completely different system
we don't know, but the people who are pushing these things don't want the market to make a decision. That's what happened
a long time ago, Nakamoto set up a temporary "mixed brand assembly computer": he limited the size of each block to 1 MB. He did so in order to keep the blockchain in a small state in the early days, until we now call it the creation of SPV wallet (that is, what Nakamoto calls "client only mode"). As mentioned above, when the time comes, it can be adjusted. It has never been said that it is permanent. In the end, it becomes irrelevant. In 2011, I wrote the first SPV tool with my respected colleague Andreas schildbach, and we built the first and most popular Android wallet together. Since then, SPV wallets have been used on major platforms. Therefore, Nakamoto's reasons for this temporary restriction have been solved a long time ago
with the continuous growth of bitcoin, its blocks are also growing. Reasonable traffic forecasts show that the block will reach the current system limit sometime next year, at the latest in 2017. Another bubble or pressure cycle will force us to exceed that limit before, and the result may not be beautiful.
so it's time to raise the upper limit, or delete it completely. That's our plan, and the problem starts: those who don't want to see bitcoin expand have decided to postpone the process. They saw a beautiful, one-time opportunity to forcibly transfer bitcoin's predetermined path to a completely different technological trajectory. They don't know what this alternative design will be, and of course they haven't built it yet. But it doesn't matter. They believe that by blocking the growth of the blockchain, they can "motivate" (that is, force) the bitcoin community to switch to different things, something more in line with their personal technical taste
why restrict blockchain
so far, I haven't explained much about these people or who they are. I think it's a very time-consuming and laborious thing to name names in this article, and it seems to be futile in the end. Presumably those who care about this matter already know it, and those who don't know it can't recognize the people who are involved in it
I just want to say that they are very few people who have access to the bitcoin core code base, or those who are convinced by their arguments
therefore, we will not discuss these arguments here, which has been too much. Gavin and I have written articles to analyze the questions raised by everyone to refute them. Sometimes the answer is some common sense, some will be more in-depth, need more work, such as network simulation
the best place to understand these controversies is in Gavin's blog. I hope to find a link to a collection of opinions similar to those refuting Gavin's point of view, but none of them
to sum up, in the long and hard debate, several different opposition groups:
if bitcoin approaches this limit, we will be stimulated to create something better
the limit should be raised, but it is not ready (the actual time is not specified)
if bitcoin is expanded and becomes more centralized, it will no longer be bitcoin< Other people: if the objections you support are not listed above, please check Gavin's blog and find out the answer
the first point may become a reality one day, but it is not comparable with the theoretical system on paper. But no one who has seen any alternative solutions on the table thinks they can be implemented within 12 months (see another example in the last paragraph, for example)... Even assuming they are better. This is also an example of the nirvana fallacy:
the nirvana fallacy refers to the name of the informal fallacy of some unrealistic and idealized substitutes for something more practical. It can also refer to the tendency to think that there is a perfect solution to a specific problem, so it is also called perfectionism fallacy
it's obviously advantageous to create an imitative dichotomy for a current choice. But it's also totally incredible. One who uses the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. According to this fallacy, the choice is not between real-world solutions. One is a realistic solution, and the other is an impractical solution, which is the "better" choice between the two
the answer to the second objection is too vague. It is reasonable to believe that the overall upgrade of each bitcoin node may take one year, and the actual bitcoin network capacity overload will cause serious damage. We really should be ready before that. In the bitcoin development mailing list, there are two people who have professional capacity planning experience, and both of them have
3. Filecoin is the project with the shortest time and the largest amount of private placement in the history of blockchain. It can make both short-term investment and long-term investment. In contrast, the ecell coin is also good (celletf. IO). ECall is the erc20 token realized through the Ethereum network smart contract. It adopts the block chain technology. All the transaction processes on the chain need the approval of each node in the network, and the whole process is transparent and open.
4. Compared with bitcoin and Ethereum, IPFs miner needs to contribute "hard disk" and "bandwidth". It doesn't need to invest a lot of money in the initial stage to buy expensive hardware to provide computing power, and it doesn't need to spend a large amount of electricity. Filecoin (IPFs) also provides 70% incentive as mining return, which is very sincere in proportion. The hummingbird H1 miner that focuses on interstellar bit is recommended.
5. Who can't boast
IPFs is a basic technology, which can also be used in other projects. What you call IPFs is actually filecoin, which is the incentive layer of IPFs
it's all 2020. Filecoin has not been on the main network yet. Many opportunities have been missed for this efficiency.
IPFs is a basic technology, which can also be used in other projects. What you call IPFs is actually filecoin, which is the incentive layer of IPFs
it's all 2020. Filecoin has not been on the main network yet. Many opportunities have been missed for this efficiency.
6. You can install a computer manager on the computer, then open the toolbox and find the software management
in it, you can see that there is the function of unloading, and the specific function of the software will be displayed on it, and then click to unload
in it, you can see that there is the function of unloading, and the specific function of the software will be displayed on it, and then click to unload
7. For those who need to pay, as a distributed storage network, filecoin is also a platform for the majority of storage consumers
among them, the storage miner provides offline storage space. Users with data storage needs can find the storage miner through filecoin and store their data. In this process, users need to pay a certain amount of fil as the cost of storage. This part of the fee is collected by the storage miner through filecoin.
among them, the storage miner provides offline storage space. Users with data storage needs can find the storage miner through filecoin and store their data. In this process, users need to pay a certain amount of fil as the cost of storage. This part of the fee is collected by the storage miner through filecoin.
8. Rescue stray dog 500 words rescue stray dog. First write the experience, write some stray dogs, see very sad, give their love.
9. First, the IPFs team is indeed very mysterious in domestic reports
Juan Banet, the founder of the IPFs team, seldom participates in blockchain summit or some offline activities reported in China, and does not have the same high exposure as the founders of Ethereum V God or other project parties. The founders of other projects are often invited to give speeches at regional blockchain summit or serve as platforms for emerging projects. The IPFs team rarely participates in some summit activities held in China, and never provides platform for other projects. According to the official weekly report of ipfs.io, the IPFs team has only organized five community activities in 2018, which are for community enthusiasts, and other meetings are for developers who need to be invited
Second, the filecoin project has not been launched for a long time, and the progress of the project is not very dynamic
according to the blog information on the official website of filecoin, filecoin was crowdfunding on the coinlist platform (a financing platform dedicated to providing initial token issuance (ICO) for certified investors and high-quality blockchain projects) on August 12, 2017. Tens of thousands of investments and excessive traffic also caused some twists and turns in the crowdfunding process of the platform. Since then, a blog notice was sent on September 13, 17, raising more than 205 million dollars in investment. By 2018, the blog has been updated four times, one is a quarterly report on January 1, and the last three are quarterly reports and Q & A in the second half of the year. Compared with other 17 years of crowdfunding projects such as EOS, quantum qtum and omg, filecoin can almost be said to be very low-key and stable
thirdly, there are too many manufacturers selling storage mining machines under the name of IPFs in the market, so it is inevitable that there are black heart manufacturers
e to the rich experience of bitcoin and Ethereum's early miners, many investors who missed the filecoin crowdfunding ICO can think of an investment opportunity to dig filecoin. So a lot of people smell business opportunities in it. For a while, IPFs mining machine manufacturers of various brands have sprung up, but filecoin has not been online for a long time. What should we do? As a result, with the technology vision of IPFs and all kinds of false propaganda, there are generally three types of black heart manufacturers:
the first is to take the equipment with a cost of 300 and sell it at a price of 1000 yuan or even 10000 yuan. Such equipment is often small boxes that look like routers. According to the feedback from the professional team participating in the test of filecoin development network, such a small box can't find filecoin
the second kind of scam is to take the white paper of filecoin, delete and modify it, turn it into a new project, and then sell the exclusive mining machine developed by ourselves. This kind of project side, while selling high priced mining machines, takes out part of the profits and manages the market value of the excavated tokens in the exchange. It can be said that it is a double harvest, which makes it impossible to prevent
the third kind of scam, with the name of cloud computing power and node hosting, has no entity. It mainly sells at a high price through the bonus mode of more than three levels, and over promises revenue and online time. Such a brand can not be found on the Internet, not to mention on the official website
Fourth, the filecoin project has not been launched yet, but the exchange can't wait to launch the futures trading
after learning about the filecoin project, some investors decided to go to the exchange to buy some fils and wait for the currency price of the project to rise. It should be noted that the fils currently traded in the exchange are futures. First of all, the fil purchased here can't be circulated, and it can't be extracted from the personal wallet. It can only be stored in the exchange. Secondly, there are fil6, fil12 and fil36 in the current futures trading, which respectively represent the delivery of filecoin six months, 12 months and 36 months after it goes online. In other words, after the main network goes online, it still needs to wait several months to get the real fil, which still has certain risks
fifthly, many Paolu public chains have written IPFs as their underlying technology into the white paper, which has led many investors who have lost all their money to talk about "IPFs"
among them, there are two projects with relatively high exposure. The first one is filecash coin, or FCC for short. It claims to be the first public storage chain in Hong Kong based on IPFs technology. Its founder, Mr. coin, once made the headlines for throwing paper money on the streets of Hong Kong. At present, the "master coin" has been arrested, and the FCC's official website has been unable to open, and the platform trading has disappointed investors because of the multiple rounds of currency price diving.
Juan Banet, the founder of the IPFs team, seldom participates in blockchain summit or some offline activities reported in China, and does not have the same high exposure as the founders of Ethereum V God or other project parties. The founders of other projects are often invited to give speeches at regional blockchain summit or serve as platforms for emerging projects. The IPFs team rarely participates in some summit activities held in China, and never provides platform for other projects. According to the official weekly report of ipfs.io, the IPFs team has only organized five community activities in 2018, which are for community enthusiasts, and other meetings are for developers who need to be invited
Second, the filecoin project has not been launched for a long time, and the progress of the project is not very dynamic
according to the blog information on the official website of filecoin, filecoin was crowdfunding on the coinlist platform (a financing platform dedicated to providing initial token issuance (ICO) for certified investors and high-quality blockchain projects) on August 12, 2017. Tens of thousands of investments and excessive traffic also caused some twists and turns in the crowdfunding process of the platform. Since then, a blog notice was sent on September 13, 17, raising more than 205 million dollars in investment. By 2018, the blog has been updated four times, one is a quarterly report on January 1, and the last three are quarterly reports and Q & A in the second half of the year. Compared with other 17 years of crowdfunding projects such as EOS, quantum qtum and omg, filecoin can almost be said to be very low-key and stable
thirdly, there are too many manufacturers selling storage mining machines under the name of IPFs in the market, so it is inevitable that there are black heart manufacturers
e to the rich experience of bitcoin and Ethereum's early miners, many investors who missed the filecoin crowdfunding ICO can think of an investment opportunity to dig filecoin. So a lot of people smell business opportunities in it. For a while, IPFs mining machine manufacturers of various brands have sprung up, but filecoin has not been online for a long time. What should we do? As a result, with the technology vision of IPFs and all kinds of false propaganda, there are generally three types of black heart manufacturers:
the first is to take the equipment with a cost of 300 and sell it at a price of 1000 yuan or even 10000 yuan. Such equipment is often small boxes that look like routers. According to the feedback from the professional team participating in the test of filecoin development network, such a small box can't find filecoin
the second kind of scam is to take the white paper of filecoin, delete and modify it, turn it into a new project, and then sell the exclusive mining machine developed by ourselves. This kind of project side, while selling high priced mining machines, takes out part of the profits and manages the market value of the excavated tokens in the exchange. It can be said that it is a double harvest, which makes it impossible to prevent
the third kind of scam, with the name of cloud computing power and node hosting, has no entity. It mainly sells at a high price through the bonus mode of more than three levels, and over promises revenue and online time. Such a brand can not be found on the Internet, not to mention on the official website
Fourth, the filecoin project has not been launched yet, but the exchange can't wait to launch the futures trading
after learning about the filecoin project, some investors decided to go to the exchange to buy some fils and wait for the currency price of the project to rise. It should be noted that the fils currently traded in the exchange are futures. First of all, the fil purchased here can't be circulated, and it can't be extracted from the personal wallet. It can only be stored in the exchange. Secondly, there are fil6, fil12 and fil36 in the current futures trading, which respectively represent the delivery of filecoin six months, 12 months and 36 months after it goes online. In other words, after the main network goes online, it still needs to wait several months to get the real fil, which still has certain risks
fifthly, many Paolu public chains have written IPFs as their underlying technology into the white paper, which has led many investors who have lost all their money to talk about "IPFs"
among them, there are two projects with relatively high exposure. The first one is filecash coin, or FCC for short. It claims to be the first public storage chain in Hong Kong based on IPFs technology. Its founder, Mr. coin, once made the headlines for throwing paper money on the streets of Hong Kong. At present, the "master coin" has been arrested, and the FCC's official website has been unable to open, and the platform trading has disappointed investors because of the multiple rounds of currency price diving.
Hot content