Which year was Ethereum born

9.

Recently, a & lt; The 27 year old founder of ether coin made a profit of US $1.1 billion; The news of, caused the hot discussion of broad netizens, make boiling on the net. We know that with the development of society, the level of science and technology is becoming more and more developed. In recent years, digital currency is very popular. More than ten years ago, a bitcoin was less than one cent, but now it needs more than 300000 RMB to buy one. Because of the rise of bitcoin, people realize the charm of digital currency, so they are attacking digital currency one after another. They have developed many different kinds of digital currency, such as ether coin, dog coin and so on. Recently, it is reported that the founder of 27 year old ether coin has made a profit of $1.1 billion. So can etheric currency still be g? Let's find out

First of all, the answer is yes. Now we can still dig ether coins{ RRRRR}

the above are my views on this issue. They are purely personal views and are for reference only. If you have any different views, you can leave a message in the comment area for discussion

10. In philology, Rida said: & quot; If philology is possible, its prerequisite is the deconstruction of logocentrism; So what is logocentrism
logocentrism is another name of Western metaphysics, which is Derrida's general ruling on western philosophy by inheriting Heidegger's ideas. As the name suggests, logocentrism is a structure centered on logos, so we should first understand & quot; Logos & quot;
& quot; Logos & quot; From ancient Greek, for λ In the first volume of the history of Greek philosophy, gersley, a famous historian of philosophy, analyzed in detail the usage of the word "oyos" in philosophy, literature, history and other documents before the fifth century B.C., and summed up ten meanings: (1) anything spoken or written 2) Things mentioned and related to value, such as evaluation and reputation 3) The inner consideration of the soul, such as thought and reasoning 4) Develop from what is said or written to cause, reason or argument 5) And & quot; Empty talk& quot; Excuse & quot; On the contrary, & quot; The real logos & quot; It is the truth of things 6) Scale, propriety 7) Correspondence, proportion 8) General principle or rule, which is a relatively late usage 9) The ability of reason, such as the difference between man and animals, is that man has logos 10) Definition or formula to express the essence of things.
later generations mainly from & quot; Rationality& quot; Truth& quot; Law & quot; Even & quot; Logic & quot; To grasp & quot; Logos & quot; In Heidegger's being and time, this meaning is not groundless, but it is not its original meaning; Logos & quot; Far away from the basis of existentialism, & quot; Logos is experienced as a ready-made thing and interpreted as a ready-made thing; Similarly, the existential shown by logos also has the meaning of being; Therefore, he wants to put & quot; Logos & quot; From & quot; Logic & quot; In his opinion, he thought that "the first is to liberate and restore its original meaning"; Logos & quot; The original meaning is & quot; Talk & quot; Or & quot; Speaking & quot;, Its verb form is legein and its root is 1eg. The basic meaning of 1eg is & quot; Talk & quot Speech is the basic link of human being's Dasein, which forms the whole meaning of Dasein. It links human being's Dasein as a whole in the way of articulation; Heidegger's later period (from the introction to metaphysics in the transitional period) was not satisfied with the analysis of logos as & quot; Talk & quot;, Therefore, it continues to trace its origin, and holds that its original meaning is & quot; Aggregation & quot;, Gathering brings the miscellaneous and mutually exclusive things into the presence. Speech is also a kind of gathering, which makes all things gather into one and show up; Logos & quot; It is not only the omnipresent operation of being, but also the omnipresent operation of language; Aggregation & quot; To explain & quot; Logos & quot; And use & quot; Talk & quot; Explanation & quot; Logos & quot; Although there are differences between existentialism and ontology, they do not change the two core meanings, that is, to refer to & quot; at the same time; Speech & quot The speech of Dasein or being) and & quot; Presence & quot;, In & quot; Logos & quot; Derrida agrees with Heidegger's research that the pursuit of logos is the pursuit of all presence through speech; However, Derrida believes that & quot; Logos & quot; No matter it is in the normal sense & quot; Rationality & quot; Or & quot; Logic & quot; Or Heidegger insisted successively & quot; Talk & quot; And & quot; Aggregation & quot; In all kinds of metaphysical systems, there is always an unchanging presence as the center of its construction system. Derrida has a good summary of this in the opening of structure, symbol and game in the discourse of Human Sciences: there is a desire for center throughout the history of metaphysics, Different centers organize different structures; The history of the whole concept of structure must be regarded as a series of activities in which the center replaces the center, just like a chain of centers. The center obtains different forms and names in a way of successive emergence and mutual coordination. The history of metaphysics, like the whole history of the west, is the history of these metaphors and metonymies, It can be proved that all these names related to the basis, principle or center indicate an unchanging presence -- Eidos [essence], arche [origin], telos [purpose], Energia [energy], ousia [presence], existence [existence], substance [entity], Suiet [subject], Aletheia [Truth], Transcendentalite, conscience, Dieu, homine and so on; The historical manifestations of these presence are as follows: & quot; The presence of things as Eidos facing eyes, as entity / essence / existence, as temporal presence of present or moving point, as self presence of thinking, consciousness and subjectivity, as common presence of self and others; Derrida's philosophy is just a response to these various modes of presence. He re grasps logos from the perspective of signifying activity, that is, Heidegger's interpretation of logos from the perspective of ontology; Presence & quot; Interpretation is examined at the linguistic level (this is mainly influenced by Saussure, later on in detail): the so-called presence means that the signified is separated from the signifier. In the movement of signs, the signifier is originally indivisible, but metaphysics can make the signifier self erase and make the signified appear, and further regard the signified as the unchanging center and the basis of determination, In order to construct metaphysical edifice, Derrida called it & quot; A priori reference & quot According to Derrida, Heidegger's & quot; Logos & quot; Heidegger liberated language from logic, but constrained language in the presence of logos. Therefore, Derrida wanted to liberate language from logos (no matter what kind of logos it is) and classify it as the game's & quot; Words & quot In Derrida's opinion, logocentrism contains two rather contradictory views: first, it is a sound centered concept, namely phonocentrism. In the phenomenon of expressing meaning with symbols, the medium of sound is superior to that of words. Sound is internal and closest to meaning, while words are external, It can only approach meaning through sound circuitously, which is an ideological tradition based on Western phonetic characters. Secondly, in the activity of care, the sound must be hidden and self erased, so that the meaning can be completely and directly present. This is what Derrida called & quot; Metaphysics of presence & quot In this regard, sound centralism is attached to logos centralism, which serves for logos centralism. The only reason for its existence is to let logos lose its superiority when it is present