Ethereum adds virtual currency
Publish: 2021-05-10 14:42:12
1. A virtual currency with a wallet doesn't mean it's more professional and advanced. The existence of digital currency wallet is the premise of currency existence. Currency without wallet can be identified as fraud
mainstream digital currencies such as bitcoin, Puyin, Laite, Ethereum and dogcoin all exist in wallets, and wallets existed before the release of such currencies.
mainstream digital currencies such as bitcoin, Puyin, Laite, Ethereum and dogcoin all exist in wallets, and wallets existed before the release of such currencies.
2. Don't go to ZT. It's dead. The coins on it will be off the shelves in less than a month. The platform allows you to go to the project side. Can only charge money can not reflect, garbage exchange
3.
The monetary gold and silver Bureau of the people's Bank of China issued the "risk warning on issuing or promoting digital currency in the name of the people's Bank of China". In the risk warning, the central bank stressed: our bank has not issued legal digital currency, nor authorized any institutions and enterprises to issue legal digital currency, and there is no promotion team. At present, the so-called "digital currency" in the market is not legal digital currency. The central bank stressed that the so-called "digital currency" launched by some institutions and enterprises and the so-called promotion of the central bank's issuance of digital currency may involve pyramid selling and fraud
if you are interested in more anti fraud information, you can pay attention to my "Laohan anti pyramid scheme", which will continue to update the inside routines and reveal the secrets of pyramid scheme. I hope you can be more vigilant and stay away from the pyramid scheme
4. At 5 o'clock this morning, when we were still sleeping, bitcoin rose sharply to US $5300, accompanied by the rapid rise of the leading currencies. After the rapid rise, bitcoin fell sharply. When it fell to US $4700, it quickly returned to US $4900-5000 and stabilized, then the leading currencies also followed bitcoin.
5. Hello
Ethereum is the main network, and Ethereum is the currency in it (my home), but now it is basically called Ethereum or eth or Ethereum, and it is rarely called Ethereum (we do). Coin an is a digital asset exchange, in which trading needs to transfer the currency to their platform wallet for operation (other people's home)
about realization: ether belongs to the mainstream currency. Realization is no problem, at least it will not run away. The rise and fall of this kind of virtual assets is still quite large. If you are not keen on finance, you should be prepared for loss. If you want to invest, you should be cautious
Mr. Yuan Wang is engaged in the development of digital asset blockchain system. If you need to develop it, you can search "Mr. Yuan Wang" on the Internet for detailed communication
Ethereum is the main network, and Ethereum is the currency in it (my home), but now it is basically called Ethereum or eth or Ethereum, and it is rarely called Ethereum (we do). Coin an is a digital asset exchange, in which trading needs to transfer the currency to their platform wallet for operation (other people's home)
about realization: ether belongs to the mainstream currency. Realization is no problem, at least it will not run away. The rise and fall of this kind of virtual assets is still quite large. If you are not keen on finance, you should be prepared for loss. If you want to invest, you should be cautious
Mr. Yuan Wang is engaged in the development of digital asset blockchain system. If you need to develop it, you can search "Mr. Yuan Wang" on the Internet for detailed communication
6. Is there no one in charge of pitching people? There's more exposure to the police.
7. If halving leads to greater difficulty in mining, then the reward will surely be higher. Because bitcoin is graally scarce, it will rise. At present, bitcoin on bitoffer is US $9300. If it is halved and doubled, the later theoretical price is US $18600. Let's give it a discount. How can it be US $15000
8. In philology, Rida said: & quot; If philology is possible, its prerequisite is the deconstruction of logocentrism; So what is logocentrism
logocentrism is another name of Western metaphysics, which is Derrida's general ruling on western philosophy by inheriting Heidegger's ideas. As the name suggests, logocentrism is a structure centered on logos, so we should first understand & quot; Logos & quot;
& quot; Logos & quot; From ancient Greek, for λ In the first volume of the history of Greek philosophy, gersley, a famous historian of philosophy, analyzed in detail the usage of the word "oyos" in philosophy, literature, history and other documents before the fifth century B.C., and summed up ten meanings: (1) anything spoken or written 2) Things mentioned and related to value, such as evaluation and reputation 3) The inner consideration of the soul, such as thought and reasoning 4) Develop from what is said or written to cause, reason or argument 5) And & quot; Empty talk& quot; Excuse & quot; On the contrary, & quot; The real logos & quot; It is the truth of things 6) Scale, propriety 7) Correspondence, proportion 8) General principle or rule, which is a relatively late usage 9) The ability of reason, such as the difference between man and animals, is that man has logos 10) Definition or formula to express the essence of things.
later generations mainly from & quot; Rationality& quot; Truth& quot; Law & quot; Even & quot; Logic & quot; To grasp & quot; Logos & quot; In Heidegger's being and time, this meaning is not groundless, but it is not its original meaning; Logos & quot; Far away from the basis of existentialism, & quot; Logos is experienced as a ready-made thing and interpreted as a ready-made thing; Similarly, the existential shown by logos also has the meaning of being; Therefore, he wants to put & quot; Logos & quot; From & quot; Logic & quot; In his opinion, he thought that "the first is to liberate and restore its original meaning"; Logos & quot; The original meaning is & quot; Talk & quot; Or & quot; Speaking & quot;, Its verb form is legein and its root is 1eg. The basic meaning of 1eg is & quot; Talk & quot Speech is the basic link of human being's Dasein, which forms the whole meaning of Dasein. It links human being's Dasein as a whole in the way of articulation; Heidegger's later period (from the introction to metaphysics in the transitional period) was not satisfied with the analysis of logos as & quot; Talk & quot;, Therefore, it continues to trace its origin, and holds that its original meaning is & quot; Aggregation & quot;, Gathering brings the miscellaneous and mutually exclusive things into the presence. Speech is also a kind of gathering, which makes all things gather into one and show up; Logos & quot; It is not only the omnipresent operation of being, but also the omnipresent operation of language; Aggregation & quot; To explain & quot; Logos & quot; And use & quot; Talk & quot; Explanation & quot; Logos & quot; Although there are differences between existentialism and ontology, they do not change the two core meanings, that is, to refer to & quot; at the same time; Speech & quot The speech of Dasein or being) and & quot; Presence & quot;, In & quot; Logos & quot; Derrida agrees with Heidegger's research that the pursuit of logos is the pursuit of all presence through speech; However, Derrida believes that & quot; Logos & quot; No matter it is in the normal sense & quot; Rationality & quot; Or & quot; Logic & quot; Or Heidegger insisted successively & quot; Talk & quot; And & quot; Aggregation & quot; In all kinds of metaphysical systems, there is always an unchanging presence as the center of its construction system. Derrida has a good summary of this in the opening of structure, symbol and game in the discourse of Human Sciences: there is a desire for center throughout the history of metaphysics, Different centers organize different structures; The history of the whole concept of structure must be regarded as a series of activities in which the center replaces the center, just like a chain of centers. The center obtains different forms and names in a way of successive emergence and mutual coordination. The history of metaphysics, like the whole history of the west, is the history of these metaphors and metonymies, It can be proved that all these names related to the basis, principle or center indicate an unchanging presence -- Eidos [essence], arche [origin], telos [purpose], Energia [energy], ousia [presence], existence [existence], substance [entity], Suiet [subject], Aletheia [Truth], Transcendentalite, conscience, Dieu, homine and so on; The historical manifestations of these presence are as follows: & quot; The presence of things as Eidos facing eyes, as entity / essence / existence, as temporal presence of present or moving point, as self presence of thinking, consciousness and subjectivity, as common presence of self and others; Derrida's philosophy is just a response to these various modes of presence. He re grasps logos from the perspective of signifying activity, that is, Heidegger's interpretation of logos from the perspective of ontology; Presence & quot; Interpretation is examined at the linguistic level (this is mainly influenced by Saussure, later on in detail): the so-called presence means that the signified is separated from the signifier. In the movement of signs, the signifier is originally indivisible, but metaphysics can make the signifier self erase and make the signified appear, and further regard the signified as the unchanging center and the basis of determination, In order to construct metaphysical edifice, Derrida called it & quot; A priori reference & quot According to Derrida, Heidegger's & quot; Logos & quot; Heidegger liberated language from logic, but constrained language in the presence of logos. Therefore, Derrida wanted to liberate language from logos (no matter what kind of logos it is) and classify it as the game's & quot; Words & quot In Derrida's opinion, logocentrism contains two rather contradictory views: first, it is a sound centered concept, namely phonocentrism. In the phenomenon of expressing meaning with symbols, the medium of sound is superior to that of words. Sound is internal and closest to meaning, while words are external, It can only approach meaning through sound circuitously, which is an ideological tradition based on Western phonetic characters. Secondly, in the activity of care, the sound must be hidden and self erased, so that the meaning can be completely and directly present. This is what Derrida called & quot; Metaphysics of presence & quot In this regard, sound centralism is attached to logos centralism, which serves for logos centralism. The only reason for its existence is to let logos lose its superiority when it is present
logocentrism is another name of Western metaphysics, which is Derrida's general ruling on western philosophy by inheriting Heidegger's ideas. As the name suggests, logocentrism is a structure centered on logos, so we should first understand & quot; Logos & quot;
& quot; Logos & quot; From ancient Greek, for λ In the first volume of the history of Greek philosophy, gersley, a famous historian of philosophy, analyzed in detail the usage of the word "oyos" in philosophy, literature, history and other documents before the fifth century B.C., and summed up ten meanings: (1) anything spoken or written 2) Things mentioned and related to value, such as evaluation and reputation 3) The inner consideration of the soul, such as thought and reasoning 4) Develop from what is said or written to cause, reason or argument 5) And & quot; Empty talk& quot; Excuse & quot; On the contrary, & quot; The real logos & quot; It is the truth of things 6) Scale, propriety 7) Correspondence, proportion 8) General principle or rule, which is a relatively late usage 9) The ability of reason, such as the difference between man and animals, is that man has logos 10) Definition or formula to express the essence of things.
later generations mainly from & quot; Rationality& quot; Truth& quot; Law & quot; Even & quot; Logic & quot; To grasp & quot; Logos & quot; In Heidegger's being and time, this meaning is not groundless, but it is not its original meaning; Logos & quot; Far away from the basis of existentialism, & quot; Logos is experienced as a ready-made thing and interpreted as a ready-made thing; Similarly, the existential shown by logos also has the meaning of being; Therefore, he wants to put & quot; Logos & quot; From & quot; Logic & quot; In his opinion, he thought that "the first is to liberate and restore its original meaning"; Logos & quot; The original meaning is & quot; Talk & quot; Or & quot; Speaking & quot;, Its verb form is legein and its root is 1eg. The basic meaning of 1eg is & quot; Talk & quot Speech is the basic link of human being's Dasein, which forms the whole meaning of Dasein. It links human being's Dasein as a whole in the way of articulation; Heidegger's later period (from the introction to metaphysics in the transitional period) was not satisfied with the analysis of logos as & quot; Talk & quot;, Therefore, it continues to trace its origin, and holds that its original meaning is & quot; Aggregation & quot;, Gathering brings the miscellaneous and mutually exclusive things into the presence. Speech is also a kind of gathering, which makes all things gather into one and show up; Logos & quot; It is not only the omnipresent operation of being, but also the omnipresent operation of language; Aggregation & quot; To explain & quot; Logos & quot; And use & quot; Talk & quot; Explanation & quot; Logos & quot; Although there are differences between existentialism and ontology, they do not change the two core meanings, that is, to refer to & quot; at the same time; Speech & quot The speech of Dasein or being) and & quot; Presence & quot;, In & quot; Logos & quot; Derrida agrees with Heidegger's research that the pursuit of logos is the pursuit of all presence through speech; However, Derrida believes that & quot; Logos & quot; No matter it is in the normal sense & quot; Rationality & quot; Or & quot; Logic & quot; Or Heidegger insisted successively & quot; Talk & quot; And & quot; Aggregation & quot; In all kinds of metaphysical systems, there is always an unchanging presence as the center of its construction system. Derrida has a good summary of this in the opening of structure, symbol and game in the discourse of Human Sciences: there is a desire for center throughout the history of metaphysics, Different centers organize different structures; The history of the whole concept of structure must be regarded as a series of activities in which the center replaces the center, just like a chain of centers. The center obtains different forms and names in a way of successive emergence and mutual coordination. The history of metaphysics, like the whole history of the west, is the history of these metaphors and metonymies, It can be proved that all these names related to the basis, principle or center indicate an unchanging presence -- Eidos [essence], arche [origin], telos [purpose], Energia [energy], ousia [presence], existence [existence], substance [entity], Suiet [subject], Aletheia [Truth], Transcendentalite, conscience, Dieu, homine and so on; The historical manifestations of these presence are as follows: & quot; The presence of things as Eidos facing eyes, as entity / essence / existence, as temporal presence of present or moving point, as self presence of thinking, consciousness and subjectivity, as common presence of self and others; Derrida's philosophy is just a response to these various modes of presence. He re grasps logos from the perspective of signifying activity, that is, Heidegger's interpretation of logos from the perspective of ontology; Presence & quot; Interpretation is examined at the linguistic level (this is mainly influenced by Saussure, later on in detail): the so-called presence means that the signified is separated from the signifier. In the movement of signs, the signifier is originally indivisible, but metaphysics can make the signifier self erase and make the signified appear, and further regard the signified as the unchanging center and the basis of determination, In order to construct metaphysical edifice, Derrida called it & quot; A priori reference & quot According to Derrida, Heidegger's & quot; Logos & quot; Heidegger liberated language from logic, but constrained language in the presence of logos. Therefore, Derrida wanted to liberate language from logos (no matter what kind of logos it is) and classify it as the game's & quot; Words & quot In Derrida's opinion, logocentrism contains two rather contradictory views: first, it is a sound centered concept, namely phonocentrism. In the phenomenon of expressing meaning with symbols, the medium of sound is superior to that of words. Sound is internal and closest to meaning, while words are external, It can only approach meaning through sound circuitously, which is an ideological tradition based on Western phonetic characters. Secondly, in the activity of care, the sound must be hidden and self erased, so that the meaning can be completely and directly present. This is what Derrida called & quot; Metaphysics of presence & quot In this regard, sound centralism is attached to logos centralism, which serves for logos centralism. The only reason for its existence is to let logos lose its superiority when it is present
Hot content