Ethereum bitcoin price
Publish: 2021-05-12 18:42:52
1. In May 2017, investors and onlookers saw bitcoin worth more than $2300. This number marks the highest price of bitcoin in its entire career. Due to the success of bitcoin in the past few years, many investors are attracted by it and other cryptocurrencies
however, bitcoin is not the only cryptocurrency with rising value. The value of another cryptocurrency called Ethereum has been increasing since January 2017. From $8.24 to $203. Up 2367%
investors are worried that in the past few years, cryptocurrencies have gained the favor of many investors who are looking for other investment methods than traditional ones. Although most investors still invest their money in traditional financial markets, such as the stock market and foreign exchange market, many of these investors have begun to worry about the economic climate of the world economy
recent events have made us aware of the instability of traditional financial markets such as the stock market and foreign exchange market. Many investors have been looking for other ways to invest their money
with the creation and popularization of cryptocurrency and its rapidly rising value, many investors, especially those from Asia, have joined the trend of bitcoin and cryptocurrency
advantages of Ethereum
although many people are more familiar with it, Ethereum has also gained a fair share of the market with its own value. However, there are key differences between the blockchains used by Ethereum and bitcoin
the difference between the two systems is that Ethereum's data processing speed is faster than that of bitcoin, because once agreed, Ethereum's system will automatically apply to the terms and conditions in the contract
although many people may think that Ethereum may be inferior to bitcoin because its value is lower than bitcoin, this is a good thing for investors who are looking for investment channels other than bitcoin. A lower price may attract more investors because it has more room for growth. The only drawback is that Ethereum is not as established as bitcoin. In view of this, bitcoin is more secure than Ethereum<
not as volatile as before
since bitcoin was founded in 2009, cryptocurrencies have made great achievements, and they have continued to grow. In fact, the value of legal cryptocurrency has risen a lot since then
although cryptocurrencies have performed very well this year, analysts expect that when the economic situation is good, investors will leave cryptocurrencies and return to traditional investment media. When this happens, the volatility of cryptocurrency will decrease because of the decrease of demand
of course, we will still see the growth of cryptocurrency in the next few years, which will help the instry remain strong. When that happens, it's a good idea for investors to hold cryptocurrencies for future growth.
however, bitcoin is not the only cryptocurrency with rising value. The value of another cryptocurrency called Ethereum has been increasing since January 2017. From $8.24 to $203. Up 2367%
investors are worried that in the past few years, cryptocurrencies have gained the favor of many investors who are looking for other investment methods than traditional ones. Although most investors still invest their money in traditional financial markets, such as the stock market and foreign exchange market, many of these investors have begun to worry about the economic climate of the world economy
recent events have made us aware of the instability of traditional financial markets such as the stock market and foreign exchange market. Many investors have been looking for other ways to invest their money
with the creation and popularization of cryptocurrency and its rapidly rising value, many investors, especially those from Asia, have joined the trend of bitcoin and cryptocurrency
advantages of Ethereum
although many people are more familiar with it, Ethereum has also gained a fair share of the market with its own value. However, there are key differences between the blockchains used by Ethereum and bitcoin
the difference between the two systems is that Ethereum's data processing speed is faster than that of bitcoin, because once agreed, Ethereum's system will automatically apply to the terms and conditions in the contract
although many people may think that Ethereum may be inferior to bitcoin because its value is lower than bitcoin, this is a good thing for investors who are looking for investment channels other than bitcoin. A lower price may attract more investors because it has more room for growth. The only drawback is that Ethereum is not as established as bitcoin. In view of this, bitcoin is more secure than Ethereum<
not as volatile as before
since bitcoin was founded in 2009, cryptocurrencies have made great achievements, and they have continued to grow. In fact, the value of legal cryptocurrency has risen a lot since then
although cryptocurrencies have performed very well this year, analysts expect that when the economic situation is good, investors will leave cryptocurrencies and return to traditional investment media. When this happens, the volatility of cryptocurrency will decrease because of the decrease of demand
of course, we will still see the growth of cryptocurrency in the next few years, which will help the instry remain strong. When that happens, it's a good idea for investors to hold cryptocurrencies for future growth.
2. Bitcoin soared to around 13500 today. The pressure of this position is very strong. It is an important watershed between long and short. To break through the key pressure, but the trading volume has not been significantly enlarged. Therefore, the probability of continued high volatility is higher&# 8203;
bitcoin's fluctuation space is narrowing, which indicates that bitcoin's performance is not strong when facing pressure breakthrough. Recently, the closing price of bitcoin rose slightly, indicating that the inertial rebound ring the sharp rise in price on October 21 still exists&# 8203;
at the same time, considering the lack of willingness of bull pull, the number of active addresses has been significantly withdrawn in the short term. At present, bitcoin may need to adjust the trading day before it will continue to expand its rise&# 8203;
recently, bitcoin is strong, while Ethereum is weak. I plan to buy bitcoin for many times and Ethereum for short selling.
bitcoin's fluctuation space is narrowing, which indicates that bitcoin's performance is not strong when facing pressure breakthrough. Recently, the closing price of bitcoin rose slightly, indicating that the inertial rebound ring the sharp rise in price on October 21 still exists&# 8203;
at the same time, considering the lack of willingness of bull pull, the number of active addresses has been significantly withdrawn in the short term. At present, bitcoin may need to adjust the trading day before it will continue to expand its rise&# 8203;
recently, bitcoin is strong, while Ethereum is weak. I plan to buy bitcoin for many times and Ethereum for short selling.
3. On July 22, 2019, bitcoin opened at $10715.1
Ethereum will open at $225.03 on July 22, 2019.
Ethereum will open at $225.03 on July 22, 2019.
4. They are essentially the same, belong to the network virtual currency, but the way of birth is different, because the algorithm is different, so it leads to the difference of the total amount. Bitcoin is a kind of digital currency invented by Nakamoto Cong, which exists in the form of P2P. It realizes distributed accounting through blockchain technology. Due to its scarcity, its valuation is relatively high. Ethereum is a kind of digital token of Ethereum. Developers need to pay Ethereum to support the application. It was invented by a Chinese company based on bitcoin algorithm
if you want to understand the content of blockchain bitcoin, it is recommended to go to relevant websites to have a more comprehensive look, such as bitmaster and Babbitt forum.
if you want to understand the content of blockchain bitcoin, it is recommended to go to relevant websites to have a more comprehensive look, such as bitmaster and Babbitt forum.
5. Core developer Mike Hearn: why bitcoin should be forked
2015-08-17 09:17:38 Views: key words: Mike
related reading: Mike Hearn: internal contradictions in the enterprise prevent Google from accepting bitcoin
Yes, it's coming. The community is beginning to separate, and bitcoin is about to bifurcate: including software, and perhaps blockchain. The two sides of the split are bitcoin core and the micro variant program based on the same program, called bitcoin XT. On August 16, Beijing time, there is now a full version of bitcoin XT
this bifurcation has never happened before. I want to explain this from the perspective of bitcoin XT developers: it can't be said that it hasn't been communicated enough
bitcoin bifurcation, this topic may make many people curious, so this article is written for ordinary readers. It doesn't involve the knowledge that has been debated before
the original version of bitcoin was carefully arranged by Nakamoto, and has always been very clear. The debate is about growth. In 2008, he answered the first question about the design of bitcoin, saying:
visa processed 37 billion transactions in fiscal year 2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. So many deals require 100GB of bandwidth = 12 DVDs or 2 HD quality movies = about $18 of bandwidth at the current price
assuming that the bitcoin network reaches this scale, it will take several years. By then, sending two HD movies over the Internet may not be a big deal
at that time, he was more tired of bitcoin expansion than any of us. His plan is to make bitcoin popular from the beginning, and he knows that this success will change how people use his system. In 2010, he said, "it's good that we keep [blockchain] files as small as possible
the final solution will not care how big it (blockchain file) becomes
but now, while it is still small, keep it in a small state, and the growth of new users will be faster. When I finally implement client only mode, it's no longer a problem
"
in 2011, through a series of calculations, I expanded the expansion intuition of Nakamoto in detail: if bitcoin becomes so popular, will it completely replace visa? The answer is that his plan is credible - you don't need anything else but a computer, even if there's so much traffic. Before he left, I also implemented the model he talked about
it was Nakamoto's plan that brought us together. It has changed the lives of thousands of people around the world. Some of us give up our jobs, others devote their spare time to the project, others set up companies and even travel around the world. This is an idea that ordinary people can complete mutual payment through blockchain and create this global community
that's the vision I signed, and that's the vision Gavin Andresen signed, and that's the vision signed by millions of developers, founders of startups, evangelists, and users around the world
and this vision is now in danger. In recent months, it's clear that a small group of people have completely different plans for bitcoin. These people have never really understood Nakamoto's intention because they are worried about success, if the technology has never been improved, if people can't run bitcoin on their home computers? Doesn't this make bitcoin move away from centralization and more like banking? What if people start to rely on bitcoin, even if it's imperfect
now, Nakamoto has chosen to disappear, and they want to make a major change: substantially increase transaction costs, end support for mobile P2P wallets, give up unconfirmed transactions, and many things that have never been found in the project's founding documents
the so-called lightning network, which is about to be promoted as a substitute for Nakamoto's design, does not exist. The white paper describes that it was announced earlier this year, and if it can be realized, it will be a huge departure from the bitcoin we know and love. Pick one of the many differences, and a bitcoin address won't work. What they will be replaced with has not yet been worked out (because no one knows). There are many other surprising pitfalls that I mentioned in another article. What will it eventually proce to make our existing bitcoin network better? It is still extremely unclear
what happened to the free market
in theory, none of this should be a problem. Lightning network is built on the blockchain, but it needs a rather trivial upgrade process to achieve the best function. Of course, people are willing to explore this direction, which is entirely possible. If the jobs they set up are better than the existing ordinary bitcoin network, then the market will choose their way, if so... It is fair competition for them! The current design of bitcoin is unlikely to be the final version for payment. This is a reasonable imagination, one day it will be eliminated in the competition, or enhanced by something else
but our system is working today. It has an ecosystem, including developers, exchanges, wallets, ATMs, books, applications, conferences, and many people have learned how it works
if there was a free choice, would people decide to move to a completely different system
we don't know, but the people who are pushing these things don't want the market to make a decision. That's what happened
a long time ago, Nakamoto set up a temporary "mixed brand assembly computer": he limited the size of each block to 1 MB. He did so in order to keep the blockchain in a small state in the early days, until we now call it the creation of SPV wallet (that is, what Nakamoto calls "client only mode"). As mentioned above, when the time comes, it can be adjusted. It has never been said that it is permanent. In the end, it becomes irrelevant. In 2011, I wrote the first SPV tool with my respected colleague Andreas schildbach, and we built the first and most popular Android wallet together. Since then, SPV wallets have been used on major platforms. Therefore, Nakamoto's reasons for this temporary restriction have been solved a long time ago
with the continuous growth of bitcoin, its blocks are also growing. Reasonable traffic forecasts show that the block will reach the current system limit sometime next year, at the latest in 2017. Another bubble or pressure cycle will force us to exceed that limit before, and the result may not be beautiful.
so it's time to raise the upper limit, or delete it completely. That's our plan, and the problem starts: those who don't want to see bitcoin expand have decided to postpone the process. They saw a beautiful, one-time opportunity to forcibly transfer bitcoin's predetermined path to a completely different technological trajectory. They don't know what this alternative design will be, and of course they haven't built it yet. But it doesn't matter. They believe that by blocking the growth of the blockchain, they can "motivate" (that is, force) the bitcoin community to switch to different things, something more in line with their personal technical taste
why restrict blockchain
so far, I haven't explained much about these people or who they are. I think it's a very time-consuming and laborious thing to name names in this article, and it seems to be futile in the end. Presumably those who care about this matter already know it, and those who don't know it can't recognize the people who are involved in it
I just want to say that they are very few people who have access to the bitcoin core code base, or those who are convinced by their arguments
therefore, we will not discuss these arguments here, which has been too much. Gavin and I have written articles to analyze the questions raised by everyone to refute them. Sometimes the answer is some common sense, some will be more in-depth, need more work, such as network simulation
the best place to understand these controversies is in Gavin's blog. I hope to find a link to a collection of opinions similar to those refuting Gavin's point of view, but none of them
to sum up, in the long and hard debate, several different opposition groups:
if bitcoin approaches this limit, we will be stimulated to create something better
the limit should be raised, but it is not ready (the actual time is not specified)
if bitcoin is expanded and becomes more centralized, it will no longer be bitcoin< Other people: if the objections you support are not listed above, please check Gavin's blog and find out the answer
the first point may become a reality one day, but it is not comparable with the theoretical system on paper. But no one who has seen any alternative solutions on the table thinks they can be implemented within 12 months (see another example in the last paragraph, for example)... Even assuming they are better. This is also an example of the nirvana fallacy:
the nirvana fallacy refers to the name of the informal fallacy of some unrealistic and idealized substitutes for something more practical. It can also refer to the tendency to think that there is a perfect solution to a specific problem, so it is also called perfectionism fallacy
it's obviously advantageous to create an imitative dichotomy for a current choice. But it's also totally incredible. One who uses the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. According to this fallacy, the choice is not between real-world solutions. One is a realistic solution, and the other is an impractical solution, which is the "better" choice between the two
the answer to the second objection is too vague. It is reasonable to believe that the overall upgrade of each bitcoin node may take one year, and the actual bitcoin network capacity overload will cause serious damage. We really should be ready before that. In the bitcoin development mailing list, there are two people who have professional capacity planning experience, and both of them have
2015-08-17 09:17:38 Views: key words: Mike
related reading: Mike Hearn: internal contradictions in the enterprise prevent Google from accepting bitcoin
Yes, it's coming. The community is beginning to separate, and bitcoin is about to bifurcate: including software, and perhaps blockchain. The two sides of the split are bitcoin core and the micro variant program based on the same program, called bitcoin XT. On August 16, Beijing time, there is now a full version of bitcoin XT
this bifurcation has never happened before. I want to explain this from the perspective of bitcoin XT developers: it can't be said that it hasn't been communicated enough
bitcoin bifurcation, this topic may make many people curious, so this article is written for ordinary readers. It doesn't involve the knowledge that has been debated before
the original version of bitcoin was carefully arranged by Nakamoto, and has always been very clear. The debate is about growth. In 2008, he answered the first question about the design of bitcoin, saying:
visa processed 37 billion transactions in fiscal year 2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. So many deals require 100GB of bandwidth = 12 DVDs or 2 HD quality movies = about $18 of bandwidth at the current price
assuming that the bitcoin network reaches this scale, it will take several years. By then, sending two HD movies over the Internet may not be a big deal
at that time, he was more tired of bitcoin expansion than any of us. His plan is to make bitcoin popular from the beginning, and he knows that this success will change how people use his system. In 2010, he said, "it's good that we keep [blockchain] files as small as possible
the final solution will not care how big it (blockchain file) becomes
but now, while it is still small, keep it in a small state, and the growth of new users will be faster. When I finally implement client only mode, it's no longer a problem
"
in 2011, through a series of calculations, I expanded the expansion intuition of Nakamoto in detail: if bitcoin becomes so popular, will it completely replace visa? The answer is that his plan is credible - you don't need anything else but a computer, even if there's so much traffic. Before he left, I also implemented the model he talked about
it was Nakamoto's plan that brought us together. It has changed the lives of thousands of people around the world. Some of us give up our jobs, others devote their spare time to the project, others set up companies and even travel around the world. This is an idea that ordinary people can complete mutual payment through blockchain and create this global community
that's the vision I signed, and that's the vision Gavin Andresen signed, and that's the vision signed by millions of developers, founders of startups, evangelists, and users around the world
and this vision is now in danger. In recent months, it's clear that a small group of people have completely different plans for bitcoin. These people have never really understood Nakamoto's intention because they are worried about success, if the technology has never been improved, if people can't run bitcoin on their home computers? Doesn't this make bitcoin move away from centralization and more like banking? What if people start to rely on bitcoin, even if it's imperfect
now, Nakamoto has chosen to disappear, and they want to make a major change: substantially increase transaction costs, end support for mobile P2P wallets, give up unconfirmed transactions, and many things that have never been found in the project's founding documents
the so-called lightning network, which is about to be promoted as a substitute for Nakamoto's design, does not exist. The white paper describes that it was announced earlier this year, and if it can be realized, it will be a huge departure from the bitcoin we know and love. Pick one of the many differences, and a bitcoin address won't work. What they will be replaced with has not yet been worked out (because no one knows). There are many other surprising pitfalls that I mentioned in another article. What will it eventually proce to make our existing bitcoin network better? It is still extremely unclear
what happened to the free market
in theory, none of this should be a problem. Lightning network is built on the blockchain, but it needs a rather trivial upgrade process to achieve the best function. Of course, people are willing to explore this direction, which is entirely possible. If the jobs they set up are better than the existing ordinary bitcoin network, then the market will choose their way, if so... It is fair competition for them! The current design of bitcoin is unlikely to be the final version for payment. This is a reasonable imagination, one day it will be eliminated in the competition, or enhanced by something else
but our system is working today. It has an ecosystem, including developers, exchanges, wallets, ATMs, books, applications, conferences, and many people have learned how it works
if there was a free choice, would people decide to move to a completely different system
we don't know, but the people who are pushing these things don't want the market to make a decision. That's what happened
a long time ago, Nakamoto set up a temporary "mixed brand assembly computer": he limited the size of each block to 1 MB. He did so in order to keep the blockchain in a small state in the early days, until we now call it the creation of SPV wallet (that is, what Nakamoto calls "client only mode"). As mentioned above, when the time comes, it can be adjusted. It has never been said that it is permanent. In the end, it becomes irrelevant. In 2011, I wrote the first SPV tool with my respected colleague Andreas schildbach, and we built the first and most popular Android wallet together. Since then, SPV wallets have been used on major platforms. Therefore, Nakamoto's reasons for this temporary restriction have been solved a long time ago
with the continuous growth of bitcoin, its blocks are also growing. Reasonable traffic forecasts show that the block will reach the current system limit sometime next year, at the latest in 2017. Another bubble or pressure cycle will force us to exceed that limit before, and the result may not be beautiful.
so it's time to raise the upper limit, or delete it completely. That's our plan, and the problem starts: those who don't want to see bitcoin expand have decided to postpone the process. They saw a beautiful, one-time opportunity to forcibly transfer bitcoin's predetermined path to a completely different technological trajectory. They don't know what this alternative design will be, and of course they haven't built it yet. But it doesn't matter. They believe that by blocking the growth of the blockchain, they can "motivate" (that is, force) the bitcoin community to switch to different things, something more in line with their personal technical taste
why restrict blockchain
so far, I haven't explained much about these people or who they are. I think it's a very time-consuming and laborious thing to name names in this article, and it seems to be futile in the end. Presumably those who care about this matter already know it, and those who don't know it can't recognize the people who are involved in it
I just want to say that they are very few people who have access to the bitcoin core code base, or those who are convinced by their arguments
therefore, we will not discuss these arguments here, which has been too much. Gavin and I have written articles to analyze the questions raised by everyone to refute them. Sometimes the answer is some common sense, some will be more in-depth, need more work, such as network simulation
the best place to understand these controversies is in Gavin's blog. I hope to find a link to a collection of opinions similar to those refuting Gavin's point of view, but none of them
to sum up, in the long and hard debate, several different opposition groups:
if bitcoin approaches this limit, we will be stimulated to create something better
the limit should be raised, but it is not ready (the actual time is not specified)
if bitcoin is expanded and becomes more centralized, it will no longer be bitcoin< Other people: if the objections you support are not listed above, please check Gavin's blog and find out the answer
the first point may become a reality one day, but it is not comparable with the theoretical system on paper. But no one who has seen any alternative solutions on the table thinks they can be implemented within 12 months (see another example in the last paragraph, for example)... Even assuming they are better. This is also an example of the nirvana fallacy:
the nirvana fallacy refers to the name of the informal fallacy of some unrealistic and idealized substitutes for something more practical. It can also refer to the tendency to think that there is a perfect solution to a specific problem, so it is also called perfectionism fallacy
it's obviously advantageous to create an imitative dichotomy for a current choice. But it's also totally incredible. One who uses the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. According to this fallacy, the choice is not between real-world solutions. One is a realistic solution, and the other is an impractical solution, which is the "better" choice between the two
the answer to the second objection is too vague. It is reasonable to believe that the overall upgrade of each bitcoin node may take one year, and the actual bitcoin network capacity overload will cause serious damage. We really should be ready before that. In the bitcoin development mailing list, there are two people who have professional capacity planning experience, and both of them have
6.
bitcoin is, of course, a gamble for ordinary people. Because I think bitcoin is a kind of virtual financial economy, which is to attract our real-life shareholders to participate in, because only more people with their own money into , these capital entrepreneurs can earn certain income through backstage operation . So how does this money come from? It's the money of real-life shareholders. For us, it's gambling. For them, it's a business that can earn without losing
but I think it's a kind of gambling. Now it's still in the market. Maybe some people will lose and win, but when you do it, you will lose everything will cause the global virtual economy to be affected by the bubble economy depression. br />
7. Now there are those who sell mining plug-ins. You can go to Yuanbao merchants in the district to buy Mining plug-ins. If you dig by yourself, you are too tired!
8.
Ethereum is a cryptocurrency whose market value is only lower than that of bitcoin. The emergence of Ethereum also makes up for the lack of scalability of bitcoin. After five years of development, Ethereum has accumulated a large number of fans. Ethereum's concise functional application highlights its own advantages, but Ethereum, which has been developing smoothly, has encountered a "blow", In an interview, SEC Chairman Jack Leighton made it clear that Ethereum was a security, which caused an uproar and led to a crisis of trust in Ethereum
some days ago, people have been worried that once Ethereum is identified as a security, most Ethereum transactions will be banned. Once Ethereum trading stops in the U.S. market for some reason, its currency price will plunge, and other Ethereum related cryptocurrencies will avalanche one after another, or even withdraw from trading. The blow to the coin ring is unimaginable
If Ethereum is really a security, the consequences will be unimaginable. After all, Ethereum has a very small position in the currency circle. Most people have Ethereum in their hands, which may make the Ethereum in the hands of investors depreciate significantly, which will bring a disastrous blow to the currency circle. Whether Ethereum can survive the disaster will make the exchange and investors sweat. For more details, please click9. AEO is the abbreviation of "authorized economic operator", also known as "certified operator". AEO system is a system advocated by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to realize the "framework of Global trade security and facilitation standards"
in the framework of Global trade security and facilitation standards formulated by the World Customs Organization (WCO), it is defined as "the party who participates in the international circulation of goods in any way and is recognized by the customs authorities as meeting the WCO or the corresponding supply chain security standards, including the manufacturer, importer, exporter, customs broker, carrier, tallyman, middleman Port and airport operators, cargo terminal operators, integrated operators, warehousing operators and distributors "
1476253268842906. PNG
the benefits of AEO certification enterprises
according to the relevant provisions of the Interim Measures of the customs of the people's Republic of China on enterprise credit management, senior certification enterprises apply the following management principles and measures:
(1) lower inspection rate of import and export goods
(2) simplify the examination of import and export documents< (3) give priority to the customs clearance of import and export goods< (4) other management principles and measures stipulated by the General Administration of customs< (5) go through the inspection and release proceres before determining the commodity classification, customs valuation, origin or other customs proceres of import and export goods< (6) the Customs set up a coordinator for enterprises< (7) for enterprises engaged in processing trade, the bank margin account system is not implemented< (8) AEO recognizes the customs facilitation measures provided by the customs of countries or regions
according to the requirements of the customs certification enterprise standard, senior certification enterprises generally include 5 categories, 18 items and 32 indicators, including internal control, financial status, law-abiding norms, trade security and additional standards
the basic score of certification is 100, the score of reaching the standard is 0, and the score of partially reaching the standard and not reaching the standard are - 1 and - 2 respectively. If an enterprise wants to pass the advanced certification, it needs to carry out self-evaluation and verification item by item. After the customs audit, there is no non-standard situation in all items, and the final total score of certification standard is more than 95
14762506773281. PNG
147625030134607. PNG
AEO enterprise certification implements dynamic adjustment system. The customs should re certify the senior certification enterprises every three years, and re certify the general certification enterprises from time to time
If a certified enterprise fails to pass the recertification and applies to the general credit enterprise management, it shall not apply to become a certified enterprise again within one year; If a senior certification enterprise fails to pass the re certification but meets the general certification enterprise standards, the general certification enterprise management shall apply
note: advanced and general certification standards of Customs certification enterprise standards can be viewed from the following website.
in the framework of Global trade security and facilitation standards formulated by the World Customs Organization (WCO), it is defined as "the party who participates in the international circulation of goods in any way and is recognized by the customs authorities as meeting the WCO or the corresponding supply chain security standards, including the manufacturer, importer, exporter, customs broker, carrier, tallyman, middleman Port and airport operators, cargo terminal operators, integrated operators, warehousing operators and distributors "
1476253268842906. PNG
the benefits of AEO certification enterprises
according to the relevant provisions of the Interim Measures of the customs of the people's Republic of China on enterprise credit management, senior certification enterprises apply the following management principles and measures:
(1) lower inspection rate of import and export goods
(2) simplify the examination of import and export documents< (3) give priority to the customs clearance of import and export goods< (4) other management principles and measures stipulated by the General Administration of customs< (5) go through the inspection and release proceres before determining the commodity classification, customs valuation, origin or other customs proceres of import and export goods< (6) the Customs set up a coordinator for enterprises< (7) for enterprises engaged in processing trade, the bank margin account system is not implemented< (8) AEO recognizes the customs facilitation measures provided by the customs of countries or regions
according to the requirements of the customs certification enterprise standard, senior certification enterprises generally include 5 categories, 18 items and 32 indicators, including internal control, financial status, law-abiding norms, trade security and additional standards
the basic score of certification is 100, the score of reaching the standard is 0, and the score of partially reaching the standard and not reaching the standard are - 1 and - 2 respectively. If an enterprise wants to pass the advanced certification, it needs to carry out self-evaluation and verification item by item. After the customs audit, there is no non-standard situation in all items, and the final total score of certification standard is more than 95
14762506773281. PNG
147625030134607. PNG
AEO enterprise certification implements dynamic adjustment system. The customs should re certify the senior certification enterprises every three years, and re certify the general certification enterprises from time to time
If a certified enterprise fails to pass the recertification and applies to the general credit enterprise management, it shall not apply to become a certified enterprise again within one year; If a senior certification enterprise fails to pass the re certification but meets the general certification enterprise standards, the general certification enterprise management shall apply
note: advanced and general certification standards of Customs certification enterprise standards can be viewed from the following website.
10.
The price of Ethereum has exceeded US $3000. The catalysts behind the rise of Ethereum are as follows:
1 2 3. Virtual currency needs a new leader, and Ethereum is selected by the capital there is an old saying on Wall Street: there is nothing new in the world. What happened in the investment market must have happened before, because the whole financial history has been for hundreds of years. The speculation and investment of virtual currency are similar to stocks, but the risk of virtual currency is greater. The price of Ethereum has exceeded US $3000. The main catalyst behind the rise of Ethereum is the sharp rise of bitcoin and dogcoin. Ethereum, which has always been favored by everyone, has always been in the stage of undervaluation. There is linkage between virtual currencies, and there will be high and low switching. Ethereum has been recognized by market funds as a new virtual currency leader, Funds believe that Ethereum is undervalued and thus driven up by funds, which is the most important catalyst for Ethereum's rise virtual currency is a kind of high-risk and high-yield investment, which is not recommended by general investors. The risk is too big for everyone< br />
Hot content