R9furyx Ethereum
Publish: 2021-04-21 17:39:51
1. the rich... Furyx does not transfer interface is not easy to use ah, give me no thanks, ha ha.
2. Not recommended. Furyx is also equivalent to 580. Even if you buy a mine, you can buy 580. At least the time of mining is shorter. In addition, the price is not cheap. It's better to add the new 580 to the price of 800 or 900. Mine 580 is much cheaper than this proct. There's no need to buy it
3. The performance of R9 fury x is almost the same as that of 980 ti. I think the performance of R9 fury x is slightly better, but the strength is limited. The difference is only about 10%
however, R9 fury X has a defect that its calorific value and power consumption are higher than 980 ti. The maximum power consumption of 980ti is 250W, and that of R9 is 275W, which is much higher than 980ti. Therefore, when running at full capacity, the heat output of R9 is certainly amazing, and the temperature is certainly higher than 980ti (the heat output of AMD procts is always high, which is a common problem). Therefore, the internal cooling conditions of the chassis must be better, otherwise it will affect the normal operation of the graphics card. I suggest water cooling (980 Ti does not need water cooling, unless you are a local tyrant and have to use water cooling)
therefore, on the premise of no less money, R9 fury X has better performance after all, but it needs to be equipped with a better cooling system. If you pay attention to cost performance, 980 ti is better
in fact, the most cost-effective is not 980 Ti, not R9 fury x, but GTX 1070. The performance of 1070 is slightly better than 980 Ti, which is equal to R9 fury x (but its maximum power consumption is only 150W, which is more than a few blocks away from R9 fury x), but what about the price? It's much cheaper than these two. Why not choose this model with better cost performance?
however, R9 fury X has a defect that its calorific value and power consumption are higher than 980 ti. The maximum power consumption of 980ti is 250W, and that of R9 is 275W, which is much higher than 980ti. Therefore, when running at full capacity, the heat output of R9 is certainly amazing, and the temperature is certainly higher than 980ti (the heat output of AMD procts is always high, which is a common problem). Therefore, the internal cooling conditions of the chassis must be better, otherwise it will affect the normal operation of the graphics card. I suggest water cooling (980 Ti does not need water cooling, unless you are a local tyrant and have to use water cooling)
therefore, on the premise of no less money, R9 fury X has better performance after all, but it needs to be equipped with a better cooling system. If you pay attention to cost performance, 980 ti is better
in fact, the most cost-effective is not 980 Ti, not R9 fury x, but GTX 1070. The performance of 1070 is slightly better than 980 Ti, which is equal to R9 fury x (but its maximum power consumption is only 150W, which is more than a few blocks away from R9 fury x), but what about the price? It's much cheaper than these two. Why not choose this model with better cost performance?
4. Single chip x is the highest
nano, second
fury is a al core card, the model is 295 * 2
x is equivalent to 980ti
nano is equivalent to 980
fury is equivalent to two 980 performance, but it is expensive, and electric tiger
recommends nano is cool
nano, second
fury is a al core card, the model is 295 * 2
x is equivalent to 980ti
nano is equivalent to 980
fury is equivalent to two 980 performance, but it is expensive, and electric tiger
recommends nano is cool
Hot content