Rent to buy Ethereum coin
It's a fraud to rent and buy on behalf of others. This car can't cross the house. Direct prosecution, the prosecution fee is only about 100 yuan. I don't know how to write a complaint. I need someone to write a complaint for you. It doesn't cost much. One hundred percent. This kind of form is originally prohibited by the state
to buy a car is to buy a car, and to rent a car is to rent a car. To rent on behalf of the purchase of these four words is to mislead consumers
fraud in the name of rent and purchase, 14 people Gang registered 36 companies, involving more than 3 million yuan
under the guise of mortgage car loan and rent and purchase, lured others to deal with business design routines, charged "beheading interest" first, then wantonly identified breach of contract and trailer, charged high fees, otherwise sold the mortgage car or even car with rent will not be refunded
On September 9, the third court of Dongguan City held a public hearing on the case of "routine loan" involving evil. 14 people, including Lin Yihong, were accused by the procuratorial organ of fraud and constituted a criminal group of evil forces< In September last year, Lin Mou Hong and others were arrested for suspected fraud and then transferred to the procuratorate for examination and prosecution. After learning the news, the victim, Mr. Yuan, had some comfort in his heart. He told the police what happened to himon January 19, 2017, he went to a car rental company in Tangxia town of Dongguan City through a friend's introction to handle the business of "rent on behalf of purchase". After that, the two parties signed a contract of "zero down payment, 3680 yuan per installment, 36 installments in total"
he did not expect that he was stepping into the "routine" designed by the other party
Mr. Yuan said that after the contract was signed, the other party first charged him a deposit, GPS fee, etc., totaling 26800 yuan, before letting him drive away. After he made 11 contributions, he asked him to buy insurance on the ground that the car insurance was e. When he was refused, he sent someone to drive away. When he came to the company to ask for treatment, the other party said that e to his overe breach of contract, he had to pay 92000 yuan for the balance of the vehicle, trailer fees, liquidated damages, etc., and the total amount was 130000 yuan after the discount before he could return the car to him
"the market price of the same new car is only about 90000 yuan, and the other side's lion is talking so much that he obviously doesn't want to give me the car." Mr. Yuan said that after that, he went to the company for many times and failed to negotiate. The other party said that if he wanted the car, he would have to pay the trailer fee and liquidated damages, etc., but if he didn't want the car, his previous money was in vain
defraud 75 people more than 3 million

private lending is a civil act, which is restricted and protected by civil law and contract law< However, according to Article 211 of the contract law, "if the loan contract between natural persons stipulates the payment of interest, the interest rate of the loan shall not violate the provisions of the state on restricting the interest rate of the loan."
according to the provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in the trial of private lending cases, the interest rate agreed by both sides of the loan does not exceed 24% of the annual interest rate, and the lender has the right to request the borrower to pay the interest according to the agreed interest rate; However, if the interest rate agreed by both parties exceeds 36% of the annual interest rate, the interest over 36% of the annual interest rate shall be deemed invalid< Article 26 If the interest rate agreed by both parties does not exceed 24% per annum, and the lender requests the borrower to pay the interest according to the agreed interest rate, the people's court shall support it
if the interest rate agreed by both parties exceeds 36% of the annual interest rate, the interest agreement for the excess part is invalid. If the borrower requests the lender to return the interest that has been paid in excess of 36% of the annual interest rate, the people's court shall support it.
