Virtual currency lawsuit
According to foreign media sources, Craig Wright, who claims to be the "inventor of bitcoin," is now accused of defrauding $5 billion worth of bitcoin and other assets from a computer security expert
Wright, an Australian living in London, has not yet commented. He is also accused of violating his obligation to cooperate with cleman and making himself rich illegally at the expense of his colleagues
A civil action against a citizen shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of the place where the defendant has his domicile; If the defendant's domicile is different from his habitual residence, it shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of his habitual residence. If the local court meets the above conditions, it can file a lawsuit against it
According to the relevant provisions of the civil procere law, Article 21, paragraph 1, a civil action against a citizen shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of the place where the defendant has his domicile; If the defendant's domicile is different from his habitual residence, it shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of his habitual residence Article 23 a lawsuit brought for a contract dispute shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of the place where the defendant has his domicile or where the contract is performed Article 28 a lawsuit brought for a tort shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of the place where the tort is committed or where the defendant has his domicile Second, the Supreme People's court's interpretation on the application of the Civil Procere Law of the people's Republic of China Article 4 a citizen's habitual residence refers to the place where a citizen has resided continuously for more than one year from the time he left his residence to the time of prosecution, except the place where a citizen is hospitalized for medical treatment2, sixth defendants were cancelled registered residence, according to the twenty-second provisions of the civil procere law, jurisdiction; The plaintiff and defendant are all cancelled by registered residence, and shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's Court of the place where the defendant lives. The registered residence of p>
3 or seventh parties has not been settled after the residence registration has been moved out. Where there is a habitual residence, the people's Court of the people's court shall have jurisdiction over it. Where there is no habitual residence, the people's Court of the place where the original registered residence is located shall be under the jurisdiction. p>
from your specific situation, it doesn't constitute theft, because you can't prove that the game account belongs to you. If you use someone else's ID card to bind it, you dare to make money. The police can't control it any more. If you have the leisure, you can go to the court with a lawyer to fight a lawsuit. This is an economic dispute caused by unclear ownership, not a criminal case< br />
if it does not exceed 10000 yuan, 50 yuan shall be paid for each piece
2.5% for the part exceeding 10000 yuan to 100000 yuan
2% for the part exceeding RMB 100000 to RMB 200000
1.5% for the part exceeding 200000 yuan to 500000 yuan
1% for the part exceeding RMB 500000 to RMB 1 million
0.9% for the part exceeding 1 million yuan to 2 million yuan
0.8% for the part exceeding 2 million yuan to 5 million yuan
0.7% for the part exceeding 5 million yuan to 10 million yuan
0.6% for the part exceeding RMB 10 million to RMB 20 million
the part exceeding 20 million yuan will be paid according to 0.5%.
Yes, it is not prohibited by law. But in the judgment, it should be converted into RMB, especially in the actual execution, unless the other party is willing, otherwise it should be converted into RMB for execution. Article 8 of China's regulations on foreign exchange management clearly stipulates that "the circulation of foreign currency is prohibited within the territory of the people's Republic of China, and foreign currency shall not be used for valuation and settlement, unless otherwise stipulated by the state." on the issue of conversion price, the foreign exchange market can be divided into buying price, selling price and middle price. Which price should be used for conversion, The Supreme People's court has made it clear in "the reply to the request for instructions on how to determine the exchange rate of RMB against major foreign currencies in the trial of foreign-related civil and commercial cases" and "the interpretation on Several Issues concerning the application of law in calculating the debt interest ring the period of delay in performance" that the intermediate exchange rate should be used on the issue of determining the time point of conversion, there are disputes over the debt maturity date, the date of litigation acceptance, the date of the end of court debate, the date of judgment and other standards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each standard. In principle, on the basis of adhering to the principle in favor of the observant party, the observant party should be given the right to choose, instead of mechanically establishing a fixed and single time point as the conversion standard. Of course, if the conversion time chosen by the creditor is favorable to the debtor, the court should respect the creditor's right to dispose