Related policies of network virtual currency

2. Virtual property is not protected by law at present! Money in society is just a kind of special commodity to facilitate economic exchanges, which is issued by special state institutions. Moreover, money can not be issued indiscriminately. If the ratio between the currency in circulation and the country's GDP is out of balance, it may lead to one of two consequences: first, inflation. 2、 Economic crisis. Every year, the country carries out macro-control and evaluation on the gross output value of the economy, so as to determine the amount of money issued in the next year. To maintain the economic balance of the country. Now you can think about how money comes from in the virtual society of online games. The answer is very simple. Most of the money in the game is earned by killing monsters or virtual skills. No game has a special currency issuing agency. In other words, money can grow infinitely in the game. So inflation is very common in the game. Similarly, other virtual items in the game can be increased infinitely, regardless of the daily economic law, as long as they are used by appropriate means (such as plug-ins). If we link these two kinds of property completely affected by different economic laws, what will be the consequences?

3. With the rapid development of information instry in recent years, the Internet has entered the homes of ordinary people, and many people are not unfamiliar with virtual property. Small to the game equipment, virtual currency, big to QQ number, game account belongs to the category of virtual property. According to the calculation of relevant departments, last year, the scale of the domestic Internet virtual money market was more than 10 billion yuan, and this market is still growing at an annual rate of more than 20%. However, coins have two-sided properties, and the network itself has given birth to many unprecedented legal problems, which makes people at a loss. Such as network theft, right protection and other issues continue. According to the survey statistics of China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), "61% of the game players have experienced the theft of virtual property, and 77% of the game players feel that the current network environment is a threat to their virtual property.". These things that you and I are used to, for various reasons, may face illegal infringement and can not get right relief. The infringement of virtual property occurs from time to time, but most of them make the judicial authorities face such problems vaguely because of the lack of a clear and unified understanding in theory: either not to file a case, or to convict and sentence the defendant for the crime of infringing freedom of communication, or to sentence the defendant for the crime of theft. There are legal gaps in both civil and criminal aspects. From this point of view, the determination of the legal status of virtual property is the key to the problem. 2、 The legal status and necessity of virtual property there are two opposite views on the legal status of virtual property in China. The negative thinks that it has no value, only exists in the virtual society, and there is no need to protect it. The proponents think that the virtual property is obtained through personal labor, and there is no essential difference between the property that can circulate and the real social property, so it should be protected. In my opinion, under the current situation, it is necessary to bring virtual property into the scope of law 1 Virtual property has legal property attribute. 1. As a property, it must meet the following three conditions: first, it must have value; Second, there must be scarcity, that is, there must be no unlimited existence; Third, it must be legitimate. First of all, virtual property has value, which meets the requirements of value - undifferentiated human labor. The value of virtual property needs to consider time, money, intellectual skills, market supply and demand, game cycle, quantity and price of functional substitutes. Take QQ games as an example. These games all have levels. Players have to pay time and money to get to a higher level. The higher the level, the higher the value of this account in the market. Secondly, just like real objects, the equipment and game currency in the game are limited, and there are also specific objects and kinds of objects. As for legitimacy, that is obvious. 2. Virtual property has poured a lot of time, energy and money into the players. Although it can't be seen in the real society, it does exist. Just like the mobile phone number, it has positive significance for hundreds of millions of Internet users and can meet people's certain needs, including material and spiritual. In this respect, it is also in line with the nature of intangible property, which belongs to intellectual property (Liu Chuntian: Director of intellectual property teaching and research center of Renmin University of China). 3. Virtual property can be controlled by manpower, including deletion, modification, use and transfer. Therefore, virtual property has the property attribute in law 2 Virtual property transaction has a great impact on the real society. Mainly in two aspects: 1, the reality of a large number of virtual goods trading status. Online property such as game currency has initially been able to be exchanged with RMB, and some online game operators even take the sale of virtual property as their profit model (so this year, 14 ministries and commissions, including the Ministry of culture, jointly issued the notice on Further Strengthening the management of Internet cafes and online games). It is necessary to strengthen the regulation and management of virtual currency in online games, prevent the impact of virtual currency on the real economic and financial order, and limit the total amount of virtual currency. 2. Network theft of virtual property is also happening in large numbers. The current situation of network theft is that the theft mode of collectivization and instrialization endangers the survival of the Internet. Therefore, whether from the current situation of virtual goods trading or network theft, it shows the urgency of virtual property protection 3 It is the requirement of building a good faith and friendly society. Nowadays, the theft of property in reality has moved to the Internet, such as the theft of virtual property and other infringement events can not but be said to be a reflection of the real society. Since the Internet has been developing in China for a long time, we should try our best to purify this land. If we can effectively curb such behavior on the Internet, it will have a good role in promoting the construction of a good faith and friendly society. Containment can only be regulated by law. As a special property right of users, whether the network virtual property can be incorporated into the legal system of our country determines whether the judicial department can directly apply the laws of our country to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. Therefore, it is necessary to correct the name of virtual property in law. Only when the name is correct, can we have the basis to formulate various laws and regulations to protect citizens' property more effectively. 3、 The protection of virtual property must admit that the protection of virtual property is still in the stage of theoretical exploration in China, and the debate has never stopped. In the face of this new phenomenon, it seems that it is not enough to only consider the traditional legal model. Therefore, we need to solve this problem with innovative thinking and appropriate reference to foreign advanced legal model 1 The interpretation and supporting provisions of the property law. People have high expectations for the recently passed property law, but there are no relevant provisions on virtual property in this law. For the lack of this aspect, we can consider to be reflected in the subsequent legislative or judicial interpretation, in order to improve the function of the property law, so that the law can protect citizens' property more thoroughly 2 Criminal law protection. We can consider adding charges or expanding the interpretation of property in the criminal law. As mentioned above, the judicial authorities have totally different opinions on the cases of infringement of virtual property. The same case but different qualitative may send a bad signal to the society. Under the existing legal framework of China, it is completely feasible to expand the interpretation according to a new situation 3 We should attach importance to the role of precedents. For example, after the first case of Internet theft in China was tried by Shenzhen court, it has played a good exemplary role for other courts to deal with similar issues. We can see that more and more courts recognize the legal status of virtual property and fictitious property. In the judgment of a local court in Jiangxi Province, it clearly recognized that virtual property belongs to the property protected by law. The court held that although there are still no relevant laws and regulations on the identification of virtual property in China, virtual property and real property have common interests in possession, use and income, which should also be protected by law 4 The way of administration. Government departments should also do a lot in this regard. We can formulate relevant laws and regulations to strengthen the management of network companies and Internet cafes, improve the registration system, make it clear that the legal network virtual property is protected by law, and punish the infringement of other people's legal network virtual property. Strictly implement the real name identity system of online games, and establish the reporting center for virtual property infringement 5 Some experiences of developed countries and regions are worth thinking and learning. Take South Korea, the most developed country of online games, as an example. When the game instry started to develop, it was also faced with the same confusion as we are now. It went to the two extremes of ignoring and over limiting, but it did not receive good results. After re examining the virtual transaction, South Korea finally recognized the legitimacy of virtual goods in law, and virtual transaction was also protected by law. Not long ago, South Korea proposed to further prohibit the intermediary services of virtual currency transaction, and formulated the "game instry revitalization law". Many developed countries and regions in the world, such as South Korea, Japan, Switzerland, Taiwan, Hong Kong and so on, have clearly recognized the value of "network virtual property" in legislation and judicature, and have been regulated by criminal law, and there have been criminal judgments against infringement of network virtual property. Some countries make it clear that virtual property has independent property value, which is the same as the traditional meaning of "property", and include virtual property into the object category of traditional property crime; Some countries, such as Switzerland, have expanded the system of traditional property crimes and created new ones, such as the crime of illegally obtaining data. Law comes from life, but it is higher than life. When the problem comes, we can only deal with it actively, but not evade and let it go. We should play an active role in guiding and maintaining the law. The market scale has reached tens of billions of huge market, if the lack of effective legal management, the network world will enter a disordered state of chaos, and then spread to the real society, if not timely and properly solve this legal problem, it will have a great impact on the personal property of citizens and social stability, but also against the original intention and essential requirements of building a harmonious society.

4. There is no special regulation

5. In China, no company that issues virtual currency has been granted policy permission. China has a laissez faire attitude towards virtual currency. The following is China's position on virtual currency:

Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the central bank, said at last year's Boao Forum that bitcoin, like stamps collected by stamp collectors, has collection value, and people regard it as an asset to trade rather than a payment currency, so there is no question of banning it for the central bank. This is also the only time central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan has made a statement on the currency

in the bitcoin risk notice issued by the central bank and other five ministries and commissions at the end of 2013, bitcoin was clearly defined as a special Internet commodity, which people can buy and sell freely under the premise of free but risk, denying its monetary attribute. At this stage, all financial hooks are not allowed to provide bitcoin related services

since 2013, the popular virtual currencies are bitcoin, Fuyuan coin, Laite coin, doggy coin and so on.

6. In 2015, the Chinese government did not issue any policies on virtual currency. The only policy is that the central bank defined bitcoin as a special Internet commodity in 2013 and denied its monetary attribute. In 2015, the central bank held a seminar on digital currency, and the central bank planned to issue digital currency. There are no other policies, but in general, no matter what policies are put forward, bitcoin, Ruitai coin and Weimeng coin, which are normal digital currencies, have little influence.

7. Now the virtual RMB has also been issued, and the state's policy on virtual currency must strengthen supervision. In this case, we can agree.

8.

bus line: Metro Line 2, the whole journey is about 3.4 km

1. Walk about 10 meters from Beijing station to Beijing station

2. Take Metro Line 2, pass through 2 stations to Qianmen station

3. Walk about 720 meters to the National Museum of China

9. There are several big companies in China