Virtual currency unjust enrichment

1. There is no specific provision, but it can be combined with the corresponding laws. For example, if it constitutes unjust enrichment, it can be returned. If it constitutes a crime, the amount involved is also calculated according to the value of real currency. Generally speaking, virtual currency transactions on the Internet are protected by law. But there is no specific provisions, we can refer to the real currency to protect their own law and rights.

2. For example, if this kind of currency is wrongly transferred, you can try to contact the other party and ask for a return. If the other party refuses, you can call the police. After all, the other party's behavior is suspected of illegal possession and unjust enrichment, which is an illegal act.

3. It is suggested to negotiate in advance for the situation you mentioned, otherwise, the prosecution will be concted after the evidence is fixed. Hope to help you.

4. The players have nothing to do with the company... But you can report, the company will help you (the result is not likely to be high), you can also directly investigate the other party's responsibility, or investigate the responsibility of improper management of the online game company

5. According to the actual situation, those who refuse to return 90000 yuan of unjust enrichment, are suspected of illegal embezzlement, and once convicted, if the amount is relatively large and refuse to return it, they shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years, criminal detention or fine; If the amount is huge or if there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than two years but not more than five years and shall also be fined< Relevant laws and regulations:
Article 270 of the criminal law of the people's Republic of China stipulates that anyone who illegally takes possession of another person's property in custody for himself, if the amount is relatively large and refuses to return it, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years, criminal detention or fine; If the amount is huge or if there are other serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than two years but not more than five years and shall also be fined
those who illegally take possession of other people's forgotten or buried objects and refuse to hand them over e to a large amount of money shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph
this crime will be dealt with only when told.

6. There is no specific law for network civil disputes in China, but the general rules of civil law can be applied
in view of your situation, you use system bug to swipe virtual currency. If such currency can be exchanged for real property, then your behavior constitutes "unjust enrichment" in law. According to the law, you may be punished as follows: return of unjust enrichment, virtual currency obtained by swiping money and real property exchanged. The second situation is that this is just an ordinary virtual currency. If it does not proce real property changes, it does not need to bear legal responsibility<

explanation of legal terms:
unjust enrichment: there is no legal basis, or after the loss of legal basis, it is confirmed that it is the benefit obtained by causing losses to others—— Article 92 of the general principles of the civil law of the people's Republic of China: if there is no legal basis for obtaining improper interests and causing losses to others, the improper interests obtained shall be returned to the person suffering losses.

7. A:
1. Currency is also a lost property
2. Currency is not suitable for bona fide acquisition, but belongs to unjust enrichment

when my teacher told me about unjust enrichment, RMB was taken as an example. I don't know how to say it. I only know that in case of unjust enrichment, I should return it to the owner< It has to be used in other places. For example, Party A and Party B have a camera, and Party B borrows it from Party A. as a result, Party B resells the camera to Party C when he is short of money, but Party C doesn't know it. He thinks that the camera belongs to Party B, so he buys it from Party B. As a result, a knows and asks C for it. This time it won't be, because C acquired it in good faith. A can only ask B for it.

8. If other evidence is needed, such as loan chat records, etc,

9. Unjust enrichment. If it costs money to make up for it, it's a crime if it can't make up for it.