虚拟货币上JUSTSWAP必要条件

❶ 盘古社区在成功打造fist小拳头之后，又开始打造osk,osk会成为盘古社区下一个万倍币吗

盘古社区通过一年时间共识了两个B一个是FIST小拳头，一个是OSK奥斯卡影视生态B。

盘古社区从成立之初的几个人，到现在的几十万股东。共识度越来越高，强共识让osk直接站在了justswap16000+个币种的榜首。盘古社区正心正念正、顺、久理念让参与股东安心放心，盘古不割韭菜，也割不了韭菜。通过普及DeFi基础知识，将一个个小白，变成了精英，一次次打散流动池，换手，把不坚定者洗下了车，同时一些投机者看清DeFi真相后，也成为了盘古股东，并且成为了坚定信仰者布道者。
盘古的理念让越来越多的认同。，流动池去中心化，筹码去中心化，社区去中心化，FIST当初一万多人把fist共识到近八千U，osk成为下一个万倍生态币只是时间问题。

❷ 去中心化交易所平台币有哪些

与传统交易所区别在于撮合方式不同，去中心化交易所用的是智能合约，而中心化交易所用的是交易所撮合算法，带币币互换的钱包其实是去中心化交易所的雏形，现在很多钱包也转型做去中心化交易所。去中心化交易所平台有：1、Uniswap；2、MDEX；3、JustSwap；4、SushiSwap；5、Bancor Network；6、Curve。

第一、Uniswap
成立时间于 2018-11，注册地区 美国 币种数量 1152 (1915个交易对)
简介：Uniswap V2是完全部署在以太坊链上的DEX平台，基于“恒定乘积自动做市“模型【储备池模式、链上撮合、链上清算】，并促进ETH和ERC20 代币数字资产之间的自动兑换交易。 Uniswap V2 的交易设计与传统的限价订单模型不同，Uniswap V2 协议为每个 ETH 和 ERC20 代币交易对创建了单一的流动性储备。 每个代币的流动性储备都是一个交易智能合约，其持有一定数量的 ETH 和 ERC20 代币。Uniswap V2 交易合约作为自动做市商
第二、MDEX
成立时间 未知，注册地区 未知
简介：MDEX支持BSC、HECO及ETH的去中心化跨链交易协议，旨在融合多链优势，打造高性能复合型DEX生态，以流动性挖矿与交易挖矿的“双重挖矿激励”给予参与者最大化回馈，并通过手续费回购销毁机制实现了自驱式价值捕获生态闭环。MDEX现已登陆火币生态链Heco及币安智能链BSC，用户可通过MDEX Bridge实现资产在火币生态链Heco、ETH和币安智能链BSC之间的跨链互通。
第三、JustSwap
成立时间 未知，注册地区 未知
简介：JustSwap是一个基于TRON的交换协议，可以用于TRC20 tokens的交换。 任何2个TRC20的token都可以交换，系统定价，交易方便，而且协议不会抽取手续费，所有的手续费都提供给协议的流动性提供者。 协议的去中心化和安全性有可靠保证。
第四、SushiSwap
成立时间 2020-08，注册地区 未知
简介：SushiSwap是一个Uniswap的分叉，于8月27日上线。它采用了UniSwap的核心流动池设计，依然是流动性挖矿和自动做市商（AMM）。在协议和智能合约层面，SushiSwap与Uniswap共享相同的接口，并且前端界面Sushiswap也跟Uniswap相同。但它本质上又改变了原有的协议，SushiSwap将Uniswap的理论又向前推进一步。
第五、Bancor Network
成立时间 2017-01，注册地区 以色列
简介：Bancor是一款去中心化的交易协议，使交易者、流动性提供者和开发者能够参与到一个没有门槛的开放金融市场中。无需许可即可使用Bancor开源协议。 Bancor作为一个去中心化的自治组织（DAO），由其社区拥有和运营。Bancor协议通过一个民主和透明的投票系统进行管理，允许所有利益相关者参与并塑造Bancor的未来。
第六、Curve
成立时间 --注册地区 未知
简介：Curve是基于以太坊的去中心化稳定币交易池，其特点在于高效而低滑点的稳定币交易体验，以及为做市商提供低风险的手续费收入。在后台，流动性池中持有的代币也将提供给Compound协议或iearn.finance，在此处为流动性提供者产生更多的收入。

❸ 中国的人民币将重回亚洲世纪吗

当80年代西方恐惧着日本经济的上升，一些人预测日元将会变成国际化储备货币。但是直到日本政府推动日元国际化时已经太迟，当泡沫碎裂日本经济陷入了衰退，日本也进入了一段长时间的停滞。现在，问题是中国的人民币在亚洲是否会成为国际通用货币。 The Asian currency crisis of1997-98 made countries realise that what is important is not fixing theircurrencies to the US dollar but ensuring that they are not too volatile.Floating currencies became necessary as capital markets were opened, which inturn was essential to secure the inflow of foreign direct investment. On theother hand, a completely free currency float was thought to be undesirablebecause volatile currency movements would harm exports. 97-98年的亚洲金融危机让很多国家意识到，本币与美元挂钩已经不重要了，但是要确保本币不能波动太大。由于资本市场的开放浮动货币成为必然，这些对保护外商直接投资至关重要。另一方面，一个完全自由货币浮动被认为是不利的，因为不稳定的汇率变动会伤害出口 In the aftermath of theAsian currency crisis, Asian countries intensified their financial integrationand cooperation to make the region better able to withstand internal andexternal shocks. 亚洲金融危机的余波使亚洲国家加强金融一体化和金融合作让本地区能更好的抵抗内外部冲击。 First, more policymakers were interested in the‘basket currency’ arrangement because it seemed to provide a balance betweenflexibility and stability. Many were attracted to the idea of keeping Asiancurrencies jointly floating against the US dollar and the euro, but looselybinding them to each other at the same time to ensure stability. Asiangovernments even looked to the Exchange Rate Mechanism, an arrangement that ledto the creation of the euro, as a model for the region. But critics emphasisedthat Asia relied on exports to the United Statesand Europe, so stability against the US dollarand the euro could not be sacrificed. 首先更多的决策者开始对一揽子货币协商感兴趣，因为它似乎能提供货币弹性与货币稳定性的平衡。很多人也被保持亚洲货币整体对美元和欧元的浮动这个主意所吸引，但是同时相互之间松散的约束很难确保稳定性。亚洲政府们甚至希望，欧元诞生这样的协定作为地区汇率机制的范本。但是批评家们强调亚洲依靠想欧美出口，所以相对于美元和欧元的稳定性不应该被牺牲。 Another difficulty was the lack of politicalwill. There was academic support for the creation of an Asian Monetary Unit sothat currencies would not deviate too much from the weighted average in theregion. But such a concept required mutual commitment, and the idea did notgain political traction. This kind of arrangement continues to attractrecognition. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Instry (a Japanesegovernment-sponsored research institute) still publishes AMUs for referencedaily, and the figures show Asian currencies converging around the centralvalue of AMU in the medium run. But the recent eurozone sovereign debt crisis,which partly stems from Europe’s adoption of a single currency not backed by afiscal and banking union, dampened any remaining enthusiasm towards a moreunified exchange rate arrangement in Asia. 另一个困难是缺少政治意愿。亚元有学术上的支持，这样那些货币就不会偏离地区加权平均太多。但是这样的概念需要相互的承诺，可惜它没有获得政治支持。这种协商会继续吸引认同。经济贸易工业研究所（一个日本政府资助的研究机构）仍然公布了亚元作为日常参考，研究数据显示亚洲货币的合并还是围绕着亚元的中期价值。但是，由于有部分原因是采取单一货币，且没有得到财政和银行业联盟的支持而导致最近欧元区的主权债务危机抑制了对更加统一的汇率协商的热情。 Second, many ASEAN+3 countries saw reserve poolingas the most attractive form of financial cooperation after the Asian crisis. Inparticular, crisis-hit countries like Thailand,Indonesia, Malaysia and Korea thought reserve pooling couldoffer a safety net. Thailand’srescue by the International Monetary Fund, Japan and other Asian countries inAugust 1997 was a model, however imperfect, for future reserve poolingarrangements. While soon after that rescue a proposal for regional reservepooling – bbed the Asian Monetary Fund – was shot down by the IMF, the United States and China, leaders continued to pushtowards a regional mechanism. In May 2000 ASEAN finance ministers agreed on theChiang Mai Initiative, a network of bilateral swaps. The size of CMI grew inseveral stages and eventually evolved into the Chiang Mai InitiativeMultilateralisation agreement in 2010, which sets up a self-managed reservepooling system. 其次，在亚洲金融危机后，很多10+3国家将储备池看做最具吸引力的金融合作形势。尤其在受到危机冲击的国家像泰国，印尼，马来西亚和韩国认为储备池能提供一张安全网。对于未来的储备池商定，1997年八月泰国被IMF，日本和其他亚洲国家援救就是个很好的模式，虽然不是很完美。那次救援后，一个区域性储备池提案被称为亚洲货币基金被IMF,美国和中国停止，领导者们继续推动区域汇率机制。在2000年五月，东盟财政部长们就《清迈倡议》双向货币互换网络，达成了一致。清迈倡议经过几个阶段成长，最终在2010年发展成为《清迈倡议多变化协议》来建立一个自我管理的储备池系统。 The environment has changed since theInternational Monetary Fund opposed an Asian Monetary Fund in 1997. The recenteurozone crisis proced a regional liquidity assistance mechanism, theEuropean Financial Stability Facility, as a temporary arrangement. Later, Europe created a permanent body, the European StabilityMechanism, to ensure financial stability, which effectively allows for regionalreserve pooling, just as the Asian Monetary Fund would have done. Having seenthis body at work in Europe, the IMF wouldsurely not oppose the transformation of CMIM into a genuine reserve poolingsystem with a secretariat at the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office. 从1997年IMF反对亚洲货币基金组织的建立，环境已经改变了很多。由于最近的欧元区危机产生一种区域资金救助机制-----欧洲金融稳定基金，作为一项临时的协定。再晚一点，欧洲创造一个常设机构-----欧洲稳定机制来确保金融稳定，它有效地考虑到了区域储备池就像亚洲货币基金组织本准备做的。看到这个常设机构在欧洲有效运作，IMF将确定不会反对《清迈多边协议》转变为真正的储备池系统，并带有一个秘书处在10+3宏观经济研究办公室。 But while these regional efforts to rationalisecurrency arrangements and create reserve pooling systems are encouraging, theyleave an opening for China.And the Chinese effort to internationalise the RMB is gaining momentum. Itremains to be seen whether its successful internationalisation will replace AMFand CMIM partially, if not completely. 但是在这是区域性的努力来合理化货币协定和建立储备池系统受到鼓励的时期，他们也留了一个缺口给中国。中国努力使RMB国际化势头越来越猛。如果国际化不完全，成功国家化是否能部分性的取代亚洲货币基金组织和《清迈多边协议》还有待观察。 The Chinese government started promoting theinternationalisation of the RMB in 2009 – telling Chinese companies that theyshould invoice exports and imports and settle contracts in RMB, if possible.There are difficulties, however, because if the trading partners of Chinesecompanies agree to invoice and settle with Chinese currency they have to bearthe currency risk and hold RMB for trade finance. Foreign companies will bereluctant to do so unless the RMB becomes a fully convertible currency; thatis, a currency with no restriction of any type, current or capital, on foreignexchange transactions. 中国政府在2009年开始推广人民币国际化，并告诉中国公司他们应该尽可能的使用人民币进行进出口贸易和结算。但困难是如果中国公司的商业伙伴同意交易和结算使用人民币，他们不得不承担货币风险和持有人民币作为贸易资金的风险。外国公司不愿意这样做除非人民币成为自由兑换货币，自由兑换货币是在外汇交易中没有任何类型的，往来的和资本的限制。 In the area of reserve currency, the People’sBank of China has started to implement currency swap arrangements with othercentral banks. First, the Chinese government allows RMB-denominated bonds to beissued and for them to be owned by other monetary authorities as foreignreserves; and, second, it allows a swap arrangement for contingency. TheJapanese government became the first advanced country to agree to hold RMBbonds. If this movement becomes widespread, it will increase the share of RMBbonds in the pool of global reserve assets. On the other hand RMB-localcurrency swap arrangements may be used as a safety net, just as swaparrangements between the Federal Reserve Bank and other central banks were usedafter the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008-09. 在外汇储备方面，中国人民银行已经开始开始执行与其他央行的货币互换协商。首先，中国政府允许人民币债券的发行和其他金融机构持有人民币作为储备货币。其次，中国政府也允许紧急货币互换协议。日本政府已经成为第一个同意持有人民币债券的发达国家。如果这些动作范围变的更加广泛，他将会增加人民币债券在全球储备资产池里的份额。另一方面RMB与当地货币互换协定可能会起到一张安全网的作用，就像美联储和其他央行在2008年雷曼兄弟破产后所使用的互换协定。 The problem, again, is that RMB is not a fullyconvertible currency. Those countries that receive RMB would not be able to usethe currency to pay for liabilities owed to countries other than China. Butthere seem to be other motivations at play. China’s official reasons forcreating an RMB-centered swap arrangement include promoting trade andinvestment. If importers in other countries cannot obtain RMB to pay for whatthey buy, the swap between the central banks can be activated to finance trade.Companies wishing to invest in Chinacan thereby obtain RMB to pay for their investment. So the swap arrangement canbe used to supplement the Chinese government’s push for RMB invoicing andsettlement. 问题仍然是人民币不是自由兑换货币。那些收到人民币的国家不能用人民币来偿还除中国外其他国家的债务。但是中国似乎有其他的动机。中国制定RMB核心互换协定的原因包括促进贸易和投资。如果其他国家的进口商不能获取人民币来支付他们所购买的货物，这个央行间的互换能激活金融贸易。很多公司都希望在中国投资由此来获取RMB来偿付他们的投资。所以这个互换协定对中国政府推动RMB交易结算有补充作用。 The internationalisation of the RMB, if fullyimplemented with capital account liberalisation, has the potential to unite(most of) Asia as an RMB bloc. Tradeinvoicing, settlement and bond issues would all take place in RMB within thebloc. Countries would hold RMB assets as a part of their foreign reserves, andwhen a country falls into a liquidity crisis, the Chinese government wouldprovide cash in RMB, either with or without IMF help. It may take severaldecades to get to that stage, but there is a clear trend toward it. 如果人民币国际化与资本自由化完全实施，有潜力联合大部分亚洲地区成为人民币联盟。联盟内贸易结算和债券发行都会被RMB取代。很多国家会持有人民币资产作为一部分外汇储备，当一个国家陷入破产危机，中国政府会提供人民币现金不论是否有IMF的援助。到达这个地步可能会用几十年，但是已经有了一个很清晰的趋势。

❹ JustSwap交易所客服