Evaluation of M3 mining machine
Publish: 2021-04-27 09:27:09
1. The desktop can't be g down at all. You can try something else. I'm just digging ITGC, which costs dozens of yuan a day.
the most important thing is that the ITGC client has built-in one click mining! One click mining! One click mining! Important things are to be repeated for 3 times. For Xiao, in fact, mining is not so difficult, as long as there is a computer, a mobile phone can, today teach you a key mining
first of all, we need to download ITGC's wallet client. We can search eppool, Download professional mining tools, and now support PC's win, Linux, MacOS's CPU and graphics card mining, as well as Android mobile phone mining! The second step is to download the official wallet client. After downloading and installing, we start ITGC wallet. Step three, start mining Mining command] enter go and enter to start your mining journey. It's so simple! It's amazing!
the most important thing is that the ITGC client has built-in one click mining! One click mining! One click mining! Important things are to be repeated for 3 times. For Xiao, in fact, mining is not so difficult, as long as there is a computer, a mobile phone can, today teach you a key mining
first of all, we need to download ITGC's wallet client. We can search eppool, Download professional mining tools, and now support PC's win, Linux, MacOS's CPU and graphics card mining, as well as Android mobile phone mining! The second step is to download the official wallet client. After downloading and installing, we start ITGC wallet. Step three, start mining Mining command] enter go and enter to start your mining journey. It's so simple! It's amazing!
2. Whether m3 can generate value for you depends on your electricity cost
many free electricity miners use m3 and pay back in two months
50 cents per kilowatt hour miners use m3, and their daily income is not enough to pay the electricity bill.
many free electricity miners use m3 and pay back in two months
50 cents per kilowatt hour miners use m3, and their daily income is not enough to pay the electricity bill.
3. If electricity is cheap, it's the most cost-effective
4.
Shenma m3, measured parameters! The calculation force of the two mining machines exceeded 13T
5. Good and bad are compared
so the quality of the car is still better than that of the RS5 CTS-V Coupe C63 coupe (as you say the double door)
m3 has become the oldest model in a flash, but m3 has never lost in major evaluations and magazines, in the real sense
I'm sure I haven't driven a car, but I've heard the sound of M3 quote a paragraph from top gear When the F-type of top gear was tested at the end of the last season, the host said: "a long lost driving pleasure is like m3, which is highly appraised!" So before the M4 is launched, no matter how aggressive Audi's Quattro + launch is, how amazing AMG's torque is, how good CTS' stability is, m3 has always been the benchmark of this level and the most attractive car. Based on years of experience of foreign car test driving editors, there is no personal opinion I think the appearance of RS5 is the best, and the trend of M3's small rotten Street affects the feeling of M3
so the quality of the car is still better than that of the RS5 CTS-V Coupe C63 coupe (as you say the double door)
m3 has become the oldest model in a flash, but m3 has never lost in major evaluations and magazines, in the real sense
I'm sure I haven't driven a car, but I've heard the sound of M3 quote a paragraph from top gear When the F-type of top gear was tested at the end of the last season, the host said: "a long lost driving pleasure is like m3, which is highly appraised!" So before the M4 is launched, no matter how aggressive Audi's Quattro + launch is, how amazing AMG's torque is, how good CTS' stability is, m3 has always been the benchmark of this level and the most attractive car. Based on years of experience of foreign car test driving editors, there is no personal opinion I think the appearance of RS5 is the best, and the trend of M3's small rotten Street affects the feeling of M3
6.
There are different opinions, some love AMG, some support M
but from the perspective of an ordinary user, I support C63
-
brand. Mercedes Benz has a better reputation in the world than BMW
-
C63 is easier to operate, The advantage of M3 is that it has strong power at high speed (4500 +), but it can't play at all on urban roads. The failure rate of BMW tragedy is better than that of M3. The electronic configuration of C63 is more suitable for urban use, Some configurations of M3 are more suitable for track use
< / OL >
in general, if you want to buy it, you can buy C63 in the city. If you want to buy a modified track, you can choose m3
7. It's not a matter of hundreds of yuan after all. Let's start with the analysis:
in terms of appearance, there is basically no change, especially in the front, which can be said to be difficult to distinguish. So far, the party can retreat
focus on the internal performance: the performance of sony7rm3 is definitely better than that of a7rii. After all, compared with the a7rii, the upgraded model sony7rm3 has been upgraded in several places, such as the continuous shooting speed, focusing performance and enrance, the rocker added to the thumb, and the touch function added to the flip screen... These functions seem to be in line with Canon's full frame SLR 5D4, but unfortunately the touch screen can only select the focus, Other operations, such as menu control and photo playback, rely on physical buttons
the enrance performance of Sony 7rm3 has been upgraded from 340 sheets of a7rii to 650 sheets, and some of the shortcomings of a7rii in focusing have been made up. The ability of focusing in the dark has improved, but it is still not as strong as 5D4 and other SLRs in terms of focusing. Battery life is still less than the 900 batteries of 5D4
the economic cost of upgrading from the 2nd generation to the 3rd generation is not low. Sony's upgrade is almost twice as expensive as that of the previous generation, and nearly 1W more expensive than that of R2...
I feel that the price is very high, but the positioning is awkward. Personally, I don't have much motivation to upgrade... I'll think about it with my wallet.
in terms of appearance, there is basically no change, especially in the front, which can be said to be difficult to distinguish. So far, the party can retreat
focus on the internal performance: the performance of sony7rm3 is definitely better than that of a7rii. After all, compared with the a7rii, the upgraded model sony7rm3 has been upgraded in several places, such as the continuous shooting speed, focusing performance and enrance, the rocker added to the thumb, and the touch function added to the flip screen... These functions seem to be in line with Canon's full frame SLR 5D4, but unfortunately the touch screen can only select the focus, Other operations, such as menu control and photo playback, rely on physical buttons
the enrance performance of Sony 7rm3 has been upgraded from 340 sheets of a7rii to 650 sheets, and some of the shortcomings of a7rii in focusing have been made up. The ability of focusing in the dark has improved, but it is still not as strong as 5D4 and other SLRs in terms of focusing. Battery life is still less than the 900 batteries of 5D4
the economic cost of upgrading from the 2nd generation to the 3rd generation is not low. Sony's upgrade is almost twice as expensive as that of the previous generation, and nearly 1W more expensive than that of R2...
I feel that the price is very high, but the positioning is awkward. Personally, I don't have much motivation to upgrade... I'll think about it with my wallet.
8. These two machines, 5D4, I have used many times, a7m3 just bought. Although 5D4 positioning mid end full frame SLR and a7m3 positioning entry full frame micro single, I think the performance is comparable
the focus of a7m3 is no less than that of SLR, even better than that of 5D4. It is very convenient to focus with eye control and free point. The only problem is that there are fewer buttons, but e to the volume, there is no way. Fortunately, a7m3 has four custom keys and shortcut menu (shortcut menu can also be customized). You can do it with one key on 5D4, and you can also do it with two presses on a7m3. More than 95% of parameter settings do not need to press menu. There's no problem with the ISO to 4000. It's basically available. 5D4 is a complete failure
therefore, you can buy a7m3 for your own use
but if it's used to work, eat and take wedding dress, it must be 5D4, not 5D4, because the guests only think that SLR is more professional
by the way, I was upgrading from 5D2 to a7m3. Originally, I planned to consider 5D4, but as soon as a7m3 was released, I immediately put out the best. A7m3 is cheap< Make complaints about br / > SONY is worth three yuan, top heavy weight is unavoidable, and SONY head is expensive.
the function of automatic adapter of other brands is limited, and the manual adapter is super cool.
the focus of a7m3 is no less than that of SLR, even better than that of 5D4. It is very convenient to focus with eye control and free point. The only problem is that there are fewer buttons, but e to the volume, there is no way. Fortunately, a7m3 has four custom keys and shortcut menu (shortcut menu can also be customized). You can do it with one key on 5D4, and you can also do it with two presses on a7m3. More than 95% of parameter settings do not need to press menu. There's no problem with the ISO to 4000. It's basically available. 5D4 is a complete failure
therefore, you can buy a7m3 for your own use
but if it's used to work, eat and take wedding dress, it must be 5D4, not 5D4, because the guests only think that SLR is more professional
by the way, I was upgrading from 5D2 to a7m3. Originally, I planned to consider 5D4, but as soon as a7m3 was released, I immediately put out the best. A7m3 is cheap< Make complaints about br / > SONY is worth three yuan, top heavy weight is unavoidable, and SONY head is expensive.
the function of automatic adapter of other brands is limited, and the manual adapter is super cool.
9. 13 inch and 12 inch are completely based on personal needs. If you are playing at home or school, and you don't have much portability requirements, it's 13 inch. It's more comfortable to watch movies. On the contrary, it's 12 inch. In fact, the performance of M3 and i5 can't be fully used in this kind of office notebook, so I personally say that the difference is only one fifth to one fourth at most. I can't feel it in use.
10. The M3 for SP4 should be m3-6y30, and the TDP is only 4.5w, which is better than the power consumption. So far, there are three mobile terminal 6-generation I3, the lowest performance is i3-6100u, which is a little better than this m3. The official price of these two models of u and Intel is the same. Generally speaking, they are almost the same. As for atom, as far as I know, no atom is better than the above two models.
Hot content