R7260x and gtx750ti mining

1.

The performance of

is almost the same at present

However, a careful comparison of specifications shows that R7 260x has higher specifications in stream processor (896:640) and sticker unit (56:40), and 16 gratings (back end)

why the performance is so close when the specifications are obviously different and the frequency is very close, while the rendering architecture is almost the same as MIMD. I guess the problem lies in the design of the front section and cache, that is, the ace unit of R7 260 (only one, and the 7850 of 1024sp has two) can not fully manage and make good use of 896sp. In addition, NV is much more advanced in cache design and branch prediction of unified rendering architecture

in the actual game, the higher frame rate of 750ti is often more than 260x, 30% to 7850, but the lower frame rate is equal to or slightly lower than 260x, and the average frame rate is slightly higher. The actual game experience should be very close

at the present stage, at least until the driver can improve the front-end management efficiency to a certain extent, 750ti will remain strong in most tests. But if amd can solve this problem, not only R7 260, but also 7950, 7970 and their waistcoats with similar problems will benefit

2.

can give you a reference to the next celestial map, or 750ti better

3. There is little difference between them at present< However, after careful comparison of specifications, it is found that R7 260x has higher specifications in stream processor (896:640) and sticker unit (56:40), and 16 gratings (back end)
why the performance of MIMD is so close when the specifications are obviously different and the frequencies are very close, while the rendering architectures are almost the same. I guess the problem lies in the design of the front section and cache, that is, the ace unit of R7 260 (only one, and the 7850 of 1024sp has two) can not fully manage and make good use of 896sp. In addition, NV is much more advanced in cache design and branch prediction of unified rendering architecture
in the actual game, the higher frame rate of 750ti is often more than 260x, about 30% to 7850, but the lower frame rate is equal to or slightly lower than 260x, and the average frame rate is slightly higher. The actual game experience should be very close
at present, at least until the driver can improve the efficiency of front-end management to a certain extent, 750ti will remain strong in most tests. But if amd can solve this problem, not only R7 260, but also 7950, 7970 and their waistcoats with similar problems will benefit.

4. HD7850 > GTX750Ti > R7 260X > Gtx750

the performance gap between hd7850 and gtx750ti is very small

but the performance gap between gtx750ti and R7 260x is about 10%

5. If the price difference is about 100 yuan, 750ti is recommended. In the theoretical benchmark test, 750ti is slightly ahead of 260x. As Mr. stie said upstairs, the price of 750ti is generally between 1099-1299, which must give priority to gtx660.

6. Gtx750ti must be chosen. First of all,
n card
is stable and performs better. Secondly, whether it is hardware or software driver, I believe in n-card. Moreover, n-card optimizes the game very well

7. The performance of R9 and 750ti is similar

8. In terms of cost performance, 260x is better than 750ti
first of all, the price of 750ti of the first-line brand is between 900 and 1000, which is 7850 2G, and the performance is better than 750ti for a few blocks
while the price of the first-line brand of 260x is in the early 700, so there is no other more cost-effective graphics card at this price
so, you can either go to 750 or R7 260x