Is there a 1% commission for mining
Publish: 2021-04-24 13:58:19
1. I haven't taken any risks!!! But I don't know much about it. In the point-to-point decentralized payment system, there must be service charges to be paid to "miners". Are the transaction service charges collected by major trading platforms? In the ideal class this Cong type payment system does not appear successfully, the so-called this coin that coin all degenerates into the swindler swindles the money commodity!!!
2. Hello, the mining handling charge is the mining fee paid by the miner to the ore pool when he is mining in the ore pool. Transaction handling charge refers to the handling charge paid to miners when users of the whole network initiate transactions.
3. There is no value. Now no one wants the mining machines. The virtual currency has been declining. Moreover, a lot of resources are monopolized. Don't dig
4.
Face to face visa means face to face visa
face to face signature is a Chinese word, which means that the borrower in the bank takes his own legal and valid certificate and relevant proceres to pay the loan fee to the bank
At the same time, face-to-face signing also refers to face-to-face visa. One of the key points of face-to-face signing is to eliminate the other party's suspicion of your immigration tendency 
extended data:
points for attention ring face-to-face signing:
1. Clothes and manners affect impression
the details of dress and manners will also affect the impression of the face-to-face manager on himself. If he dresses appropriately and looks generous, he will appear to be ecated and knowledgeable, and leave a good impression on the face-to-face manager
2. True information:
in fact, the most important thing is to verify the authenticity of the information in the face-to-face signing process. Therefore, it's good to truthfully answer all kinds of questions of the face-to-face signing manager. Don't deliberately raise your income to leave a good impression, and simulate your actual situation. This strategy is harmful but not beneficial in face-to-face signing
3. Prepare all the materials:
when signing face-to-face, you should bring all the required information at one time. In this way, you can save time and effort, and leave a good impression of planning, preparation and responsibility in the face-to-face manager< br />
5. What kind of game... I didn't hear that there was a handling charge for mining... I don't know about the others. I played wow, and the mines inside were all in the wild. When I met them, I picked them. There was no handling charge.
6. What's your starting point?
if your friend asks you to invest,
you can make your friend lose money to you.
if you watch your friend buy money,
earn money and then ask you to do it together,
and then ask others to pay you back when you lose money,
this is not reasonable
if your friend asks you to invest,
you can make your friend lose money to you.
if you watch your friend buy money,
earn money and then ask you to do it together,
and then ask others to pay you back when you lose money,
this is not reasonable
7. I hope I can help you. If you don't understand anything, please ask me whether you can adopt it. Thank you. Formal logic refers to the concept of logical derivation in the field of comparative mathematics. The common logic we usually talk about includes many elements of experience and common sense; See the following for details:
1. Connotative formal logic is a science that studies dective reasoning and its laws, including the study of logical properties of lexical items and propositional forms, the study of thinking structure and the study of inevitable dection. It provides criteria for testing effective reasoning and ineffective reasoning.
it summarizes the experience and lessons of human thinking, To maintain the certainty of thinking as the core, with a series of rules and methods to help people correctly think about problems and express their ideas, is a necessary tool for people to understand and transform the world, and is a thinking method after the development of human cognition to a certain stage. Kant first used the term. The research method of formal logic the relationship between the premise and the conclusion in the research of formal logic is determined by the logical form of the proposition as the premise and conclusion, and the logical property of the logical form of the proposition is determined by the logical constant
in order to clarify the nature of logical constants and reveal the reasoning rules systematically, we need to study meta logic by establishing logical calculus. The method of studying meta logic is formal axiomatic method. The rules of formal logic include the law of uniformity, the law of contradiction, the law of excluded middle and the law of sufficient reason. These four laws require that thinking must have certainty, no contradiction, consistency and argumentation. The defect and Transcendence of formal logic are composed of its content and form. It is obviously impossible for formal logic to understand the whole picture of thinking by grasping the form of thinking without considering the content of thinking
this attempt has been criticized by both the East and the West. The East is a famous school of thought in the Warring States period, represented by Huishi, Gongsunlong, huantuan and Weimou. They greatly complicate the content of logic by replacing the content of logic with extreme situation or by adding time and space, movement (stillness), observer, category and other factors, that is, using extreme situation and complex situation to bankrupt the formal logic at that time. The principle is that the form always has a certain carrying capacity. If the content exceeds the limit that the form can bear, then the original form will collapse, followed by a new form adapted to the new content. However, e to the naivety of philosophy, what they built on the ruins of formal logic was a sophistication debate - they were transformed from potential discoverers into pure destroyers< In the west, Hegel turned the focus of logic research to the content of logic, thus establishing dialectical logic. Instead of establishing logic according to content as Hegel did, famous scholars are satisfied with destroying formal logic by manipulating content. They enjoy debating. If they confuse their opponents, they will be happy. Therefore, they can not avoid the temptation of sophistry. Hegel began to construct new logic while criticizing formal logic. In addition, as far as the object of criticism is concerned, the development of formal logic in China at that time was not high, and its propositions were broken, which led to the fact that the famous scholars could give isolated sophistry propositions after criticism. The formal logic criticized by Hegel is systematic. If we want to succeed in the criticism, we need to find a logic of the same system instead of playing with several propositions. Naturally, Hegel's dialectical logic also has defects
for example, absolute spirit only negates itself twice - why is there no third negation< In addition, the criticism of formal logic is too much, which leads to the dialectical logic staying at the level of pure speculation. These problems left over by idealist dialectics have finally been solved by materialist dialectics[ Formal logic has a history of more than 2000 years. Before the middle of the 19th century, formal logic was mainly traditional logic. After the middle of the 19th century, modern formal logic, which is usually called mathematical logic, is also called symbolic logic. Traditional logic usually divides propositions into categorical propositions, disjunctive propositions and hypothetical propositions, The form and reasoning form of these propositions are studied. Traditional logic also includes the theory of the law of contradiction and the law of excluded middle, as well as the theory of terms. The founder of formal logic in Europe is Aristotle of ancient Greece. Aristotle established the first logical system, namely the theory of syllogism. His representative works on formal logic are metaphysics and instrumentalism. After Aristotle, the logic of the school of megala Stoa revealed some important properties of propositional connectives, discovered some reasoning forms and rules related to propositional connectives, and developed dective logic. Another ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus believed that inction was the only scientific method< Some logicians in the Middle Ages developed and enriched formal logic. In modern times, bacon and John Muller further developed inction. In China, formal logic came into being at the same time as in Europe
the representative schools include Mohist School and famous school, and Xunzi School of Confucianism. Interestingly, Mohist study of logic is to find the principles of logic, while the famous is to establish a sophistry system. Mohist's understanding of logic is embodied in Mojing, which has systematically discussed logic. For example, it distinguishes the sufficient condition and the necessary condition, and puts forward "the great cause (sufficient condition), the necessity of having, the necessity of not having" and "the minor cause (necessary condition), the inevitability of having, the necessity of not having"< However, Huishi, a famous scholar, puts forward the sophistry principle of "contract difference" in order to cancel the boundary of concept. On the contrary, Gongsun long, who is also a famous scholar, puts forward the sophistry principle of "Li Jian Bai", which holds that any independent concept has and can only have a single attribute. Famous scholars have put forward many sophistication propositions, such as "white horse is not a horse", "chicken has three feet", "solitary calf without mother", "chain without buckle", "white dog black" and "today is more suitable than ever" and so on. Obviously, this kind of "reversing" research method of famous scholars is unique in China. Its ability to establish its sophistry system just shows that the level of logic development at that time was very low, and there were a lot of loopholes - so famous scholars had a chance to take advantage of it. However, these loopholes have been fully exposed by the action of famous scholars, which provides a stepping stone for future generations' research. If we want to develop logic, we must overcome the sophistry proposition of famous scholars. In addition, there are also reasonable factors in the sophistry propositions of famous scholars - some of them really hit the key of formal logic, which means that there are other logic besides formal logic. Finally, some propositions of famous scholars may contain reasonable understanding of nature and human cognitive process
for example, a proposition is "the center of the world, the north of Yan and the south of Vietnam". If this proposition is to be true, it must take "the earth is round" as the premise. At that time, it was not easy for a famous scholar to have such an understanding when the theory of "covering the sky" was dominant. Another proposition is that "the bird is not moving". If we make a positive solution, we should realize that our intuitive concept of "motion" is based on the knowledge of two times of stillness. It was not easy to make these judgments at that time, but these understandings appeared in the form of sophistry< Since then, the development of formal logic in China has basically stagnated. In ancient India, Shenglun school and Zhengli school founded Yinming school in the fourth century B.C., and Chen Na perfected it in the sixth century. Yinming theory is formal logic. Mathematical logic is modern formal logic. The reason why it is called mathematical logic is that, on the one hand, artificial symbolic language is widely used in the research, and a formal axiomatic method is developed. At the same time, some mathematical tools and concrete results are applied; On the other hand, the development of modern formal logic is promoted by the basic research of mathematics, especially by the in-depth study of the logic law of mathematical proof and the logic problems raised in the basic research of mathematics. The reason why mathematical logic is also called symbolic logic is that it uses artificial symbolic language. The founder of mathematical logic is g.w.leibniz. Leibniz put forward the idea of establishing "universal symbolic language", reasoning calculus and thinking mechanization. Although Leibniz himself did not achieve his goal, but the development of mathematical logic has graally (not all) realized Leibniz's ideal< In his book concept language published in 1879, G. Frege established the first first order logic system< In the 1870s, G. Cantor founded set theory. Set theory, especially the establishment of the first first-order logic system, is the symbol of the development of formal logic into the modern stage[ In the 1930s and 1940s, the Soviet Union criticized formal logic as metaphysics and dialectics as the only scientific logic. When we talk about dialectics, we must criticize formal logic. Under this influence, some people in China "sentenced" the "death penalty" of formal logic at that time. However, before 1949, this trend of thought of totally negating formal logic did not belong to the mainstream in China. From 1949 to 1950, this trend of thought also became the mainstream in China. It was only after Stalin's "problems of Marxism and Linguistics" was published in 1950 that China was "rehabilitated" by formal logic. However, "vindication" is not complete. Like the Soviet Union, formal logic still bears the label of "elementary logic", while "higher logic" naturally belongs to dialectics or dialectical logic. Negating and belittling formal logic not only hinders the development of logic science, but also results in the prevalence of sophistry. Hegel once made a scornful comment on Leibniz's assumption of mathematical logic
Mathematical Logic (the first mathematical logic system was put forward by freig in 1879) emerged after the emergence of Marxism, which was regarded as a pseudo science serving the monopoly bourgeoisie in the early 1950s. It was only in the 1961's that it began to break through some of the restrictions of the Soviet Union's logic teaching materials from the 1950s to the 1960s, clearing away all kinds of common sense errors spread in the Soviet Union's teaching materials[ The relationship between formal logic and other logics the logic logic beyond formal logic is the abstraction of thinking process. The purpose of studying logic is to find out the reason of the conclusion on the level of thinking. From the perspective of this research task, all the thinking processes that have the function of drawing conclusions are logical processes. Therefore, human logic can be divided into three categories: simple logic, instrumental logic (including naming logic, formal logic and representation logic) and dialectical logic
compared with simple logic, formal logic cannot explain some life events, nor can it explain the source of logic that does not conform to formal logic itself. For example, such a language structure "even... (noun a) I don't think... (adjective z), then... (noun b) can be... (adjective z)" Formal logic cannot be explained. And simple
1. Connotative formal logic is a science that studies dective reasoning and its laws, including the study of logical properties of lexical items and propositional forms, the study of thinking structure and the study of inevitable dection. It provides criteria for testing effective reasoning and ineffective reasoning.
it summarizes the experience and lessons of human thinking, To maintain the certainty of thinking as the core, with a series of rules and methods to help people correctly think about problems and express their ideas, is a necessary tool for people to understand and transform the world, and is a thinking method after the development of human cognition to a certain stage. Kant first used the term. The research method of formal logic the relationship between the premise and the conclusion in the research of formal logic is determined by the logical form of the proposition as the premise and conclusion, and the logical property of the logical form of the proposition is determined by the logical constant
in order to clarify the nature of logical constants and reveal the reasoning rules systematically, we need to study meta logic by establishing logical calculus. The method of studying meta logic is formal axiomatic method. The rules of formal logic include the law of uniformity, the law of contradiction, the law of excluded middle and the law of sufficient reason. These four laws require that thinking must have certainty, no contradiction, consistency and argumentation. The defect and Transcendence of formal logic are composed of its content and form. It is obviously impossible for formal logic to understand the whole picture of thinking by grasping the form of thinking without considering the content of thinking
this attempt has been criticized by both the East and the West. The East is a famous school of thought in the Warring States period, represented by Huishi, Gongsunlong, huantuan and Weimou. They greatly complicate the content of logic by replacing the content of logic with extreme situation or by adding time and space, movement (stillness), observer, category and other factors, that is, using extreme situation and complex situation to bankrupt the formal logic at that time. The principle is that the form always has a certain carrying capacity. If the content exceeds the limit that the form can bear, then the original form will collapse, followed by a new form adapted to the new content. However, e to the naivety of philosophy, what they built on the ruins of formal logic was a sophistication debate - they were transformed from potential discoverers into pure destroyers< In the west, Hegel turned the focus of logic research to the content of logic, thus establishing dialectical logic. Instead of establishing logic according to content as Hegel did, famous scholars are satisfied with destroying formal logic by manipulating content. They enjoy debating. If they confuse their opponents, they will be happy. Therefore, they can not avoid the temptation of sophistry. Hegel began to construct new logic while criticizing formal logic. In addition, as far as the object of criticism is concerned, the development of formal logic in China at that time was not high, and its propositions were broken, which led to the fact that the famous scholars could give isolated sophistry propositions after criticism. The formal logic criticized by Hegel is systematic. If we want to succeed in the criticism, we need to find a logic of the same system instead of playing with several propositions. Naturally, Hegel's dialectical logic also has defects
for example, absolute spirit only negates itself twice - why is there no third negation< In addition, the criticism of formal logic is too much, which leads to the dialectical logic staying at the level of pure speculation. These problems left over by idealist dialectics have finally been solved by materialist dialectics[ Formal logic has a history of more than 2000 years. Before the middle of the 19th century, formal logic was mainly traditional logic. After the middle of the 19th century, modern formal logic, which is usually called mathematical logic, is also called symbolic logic. Traditional logic usually divides propositions into categorical propositions, disjunctive propositions and hypothetical propositions, The form and reasoning form of these propositions are studied. Traditional logic also includes the theory of the law of contradiction and the law of excluded middle, as well as the theory of terms. The founder of formal logic in Europe is Aristotle of ancient Greece. Aristotle established the first logical system, namely the theory of syllogism. His representative works on formal logic are metaphysics and instrumentalism. After Aristotle, the logic of the school of megala Stoa revealed some important properties of propositional connectives, discovered some reasoning forms and rules related to propositional connectives, and developed dective logic. Another ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus believed that inction was the only scientific method< Some logicians in the Middle Ages developed and enriched formal logic. In modern times, bacon and John Muller further developed inction. In China, formal logic came into being at the same time as in Europe
the representative schools include Mohist School and famous school, and Xunzi School of Confucianism. Interestingly, Mohist study of logic is to find the principles of logic, while the famous is to establish a sophistry system. Mohist's understanding of logic is embodied in Mojing, which has systematically discussed logic. For example, it distinguishes the sufficient condition and the necessary condition, and puts forward "the great cause (sufficient condition), the necessity of having, the necessity of not having" and "the minor cause (necessary condition), the inevitability of having, the necessity of not having"< However, Huishi, a famous scholar, puts forward the sophistry principle of "contract difference" in order to cancel the boundary of concept. On the contrary, Gongsun long, who is also a famous scholar, puts forward the sophistry principle of "Li Jian Bai", which holds that any independent concept has and can only have a single attribute. Famous scholars have put forward many sophistication propositions, such as "white horse is not a horse", "chicken has three feet", "solitary calf without mother", "chain without buckle", "white dog black" and "today is more suitable than ever" and so on. Obviously, this kind of "reversing" research method of famous scholars is unique in China. Its ability to establish its sophistry system just shows that the level of logic development at that time was very low, and there were a lot of loopholes - so famous scholars had a chance to take advantage of it. However, these loopholes have been fully exposed by the action of famous scholars, which provides a stepping stone for future generations' research. If we want to develop logic, we must overcome the sophistry proposition of famous scholars. In addition, there are also reasonable factors in the sophistry propositions of famous scholars - some of them really hit the key of formal logic, which means that there are other logic besides formal logic. Finally, some propositions of famous scholars may contain reasonable understanding of nature and human cognitive process
for example, a proposition is "the center of the world, the north of Yan and the south of Vietnam". If this proposition is to be true, it must take "the earth is round" as the premise. At that time, it was not easy for a famous scholar to have such an understanding when the theory of "covering the sky" was dominant. Another proposition is that "the bird is not moving". If we make a positive solution, we should realize that our intuitive concept of "motion" is based on the knowledge of two times of stillness. It was not easy to make these judgments at that time, but these understandings appeared in the form of sophistry< Since then, the development of formal logic in China has basically stagnated. In ancient India, Shenglun school and Zhengli school founded Yinming school in the fourth century B.C., and Chen Na perfected it in the sixth century. Yinming theory is formal logic. Mathematical logic is modern formal logic. The reason why it is called mathematical logic is that, on the one hand, artificial symbolic language is widely used in the research, and a formal axiomatic method is developed. At the same time, some mathematical tools and concrete results are applied; On the other hand, the development of modern formal logic is promoted by the basic research of mathematics, especially by the in-depth study of the logic law of mathematical proof and the logic problems raised in the basic research of mathematics. The reason why mathematical logic is also called symbolic logic is that it uses artificial symbolic language. The founder of mathematical logic is g.w.leibniz. Leibniz put forward the idea of establishing "universal symbolic language", reasoning calculus and thinking mechanization. Although Leibniz himself did not achieve his goal, but the development of mathematical logic has graally (not all) realized Leibniz's ideal< In his book concept language published in 1879, G. Frege established the first first order logic system< In the 1870s, G. Cantor founded set theory. Set theory, especially the establishment of the first first-order logic system, is the symbol of the development of formal logic into the modern stage[ In the 1930s and 1940s, the Soviet Union criticized formal logic as metaphysics and dialectics as the only scientific logic. When we talk about dialectics, we must criticize formal logic. Under this influence, some people in China "sentenced" the "death penalty" of formal logic at that time. However, before 1949, this trend of thought of totally negating formal logic did not belong to the mainstream in China. From 1949 to 1950, this trend of thought also became the mainstream in China. It was only after Stalin's "problems of Marxism and Linguistics" was published in 1950 that China was "rehabilitated" by formal logic. However, "vindication" is not complete. Like the Soviet Union, formal logic still bears the label of "elementary logic", while "higher logic" naturally belongs to dialectics or dialectical logic. Negating and belittling formal logic not only hinders the development of logic science, but also results in the prevalence of sophistry. Hegel once made a scornful comment on Leibniz's assumption of mathematical logic
Mathematical Logic (the first mathematical logic system was put forward by freig in 1879) emerged after the emergence of Marxism, which was regarded as a pseudo science serving the monopoly bourgeoisie in the early 1950s. It was only in the 1961's that it began to break through some of the restrictions of the Soviet Union's logic teaching materials from the 1950s to the 1960s, clearing away all kinds of common sense errors spread in the Soviet Union's teaching materials[ The relationship between formal logic and other logics the logic logic beyond formal logic is the abstraction of thinking process. The purpose of studying logic is to find out the reason of the conclusion on the level of thinking. From the perspective of this research task, all the thinking processes that have the function of drawing conclusions are logical processes. Therefore, human logic can be divided into three categories: simple logic, instrumental logic (including naming logic, formal logic and representation logic) and dialectical logic
compared with simple logic, formal logic cannot explain some life events, nor can it explain the source of logic that does not conform to formal logic itself. For example, such a language structure "even... (noun a) I don't think... (adjective z), then... (noun b) can be... (adjective z)" Formal logic cannot be explained. And simple
Hot content